首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A New Approach to Debate Ⅰ. Teachers’ hesitation: debate is beyond students’ 【T1】______ Ⅱ. Suggestions from Prof. Charles Lebeau
A New Approach to Debate Ⅰ. Teachers’ hesitation: debate is beyond students’ 【T1】______ Ⅱ. Suggestions from Prof. Charles Lebeau
admin
2018-06-21
80
问题
A New Approach to Debate
Ⅰ. Teachers’ hesitation: debate is beyond students’ 【T1】______
Ⅱ. Suggestions from Prof. Charles Lebeau to teachers
a) Begin with controlled practice: to 【T2】______ opinions and arguments
b) Caution: no 【T3】______ topics
Ⅲ. "Discover Debate" Approach
Team members: depending on the 【T4】______ of students
The first stage: creating a 【T5】______ aid
The second stage: presenting arguments
The third stage: answering the 【T6】______ argument
a) Pause for the opponents to develop answers or 【T7】______
b) Evaluate arguments: to look for 【T8】______
c) Write easily remembered 【T9】______
Ending: ask for audience 【T10】______
【T8】
A New Approach to Debate
[1]
Teachers of English may hesitate to teach debate because they think it is beyond their students’ language ability, or proficiency.
But debate can be a powerful tool. It can help students learn to speak naturally and to listen carefully.
Professor Charles Lebeau teaches English and debate in Japan. He wrote "Discover Debate" with Michael Lubetsky. The book helps English teachers and learners understand how to carry on a simple debate.
The "Discover Debate" approach has three stages: creating a visual aid to communicate an argument, presenting the argument and answering the other team’s argument. Each stage puts increasing demands on language ability. It begins with a pre-debate experience.
When teaching debate to English learners, Mr. Lebeau recommends beginning with "controlled practice." Students work in pairs to practice saying opinions and giving reasons in short conversations. [2]
They learn to identify opinions and arguments about everyday topics, such as sports stars, foods, weather and habits.
[3]
Teachers may be tempted to give students serious topics, such as "People should stop using nuclear power."
However, Mr. Lebeau cautions that English learners may not have the necessary language ability to handle such topics. More serious topics often require special vocabulary and research.
Mr. Lebeau’s classes in Japan are like many in universities; they have 40 to 50 students. [4]
He has students form debate teams of three or six, depending on the total number of students.
[5]
Each team creates a visual aid to show their thinking on the topic.
The visual is a house: a roof represents an opinion, pillars are the reasons supporting the opinion and the foundation is the evidence.
In the next stage, students present their argument. They have to do some talking, but not too much.
[6]
The third stage is answering the opponents’ argument.
Here, debaters need a higher level of language ability. [7]
Mr. Lebeau recommends pausing for the opposing team to develop their answers, or refutations.
Each team might go to a different area and discuss the weak points in the opposing argument. Students must first think about the arguments carefully. In "Discover Debate," Michael Lubetsky and Charles Lebeau include a guide to help students evaluate arguments. The evaluation also takes advantage of the visual aid of a house. [8]
Students are asked to look for flaws, or problems.
They identify things that are either "not true" or "not important."
[9]
Students can write easily remembered abbreviations on their opponents’ houses: "NT" for not true, "NAT" for not always true, or "NNT" for not necessarily true.
These simple expressions make it easier for students to refute their opponents’ arguments.
Traditional debate includes several cycles of presentation and refutation. For English learners, one cycle of presentation and refutation is usually enough practice. Mr. Lebeau says sometimes he asks the rest of the class to vote on which side won. [10]
Asking for audience feedback gives the lesson a good ending.
But, he says, additional discussion depends on the situation and the level of the students.
选项
答案
flaws/problems
解析
动词短语look for提示空格处需填入名词。录音提及学生在评论观点的过程中,需要找瑕疵或问题。因此这里填flaws或者problems都可以。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/MqxK777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
TeachersandresearchersofEnglishlanguageartshavebeenstrugglingwiththeeffectsofcomputersonreadingsincethe1960s
Thankyouforapplyingforapositionwithourfirm.Wedonothaveanyopeningsatthistime,butweshallkeepyourapplicatio
Onebillionpeopleintheworldareshortofwater.Howcanthisproblembesolved?Somesuggestionshavebeentodesalinateoce
Acutehearinghelpsmostanimalssensetheapproachofthunderstormslongbeforepeople______.
A、Askthestudentsnottocome.B、Reportthesituationtothehead.C、Movethesuppliestothestorageroom.D、Findaseparater
A、Shewantstohaveanotherjobaswellasthefirstone.B、Shewantstospendmoretimeonheruniversitystudies.C、Shefeels
(1)AUniversityofLeicesterteamtestedtheeffectofregularswimmingsessionswithdolphinson15depressedpeopleinastudy
(1)AUniversityofLeicesterteamtestedtheeffectofregularswimmingsessionswithdolphinson15depressedpeopleinastudy
InTheArtofChoosing,SheenaIyengar,abusinessprofessoratColumbiaUniversityandaleadingexpertondecisionmaking,tel
随机试题
京师大学堂
Medicalstudiesshowthatonlytwotofivepercentoftheobesemanagetoshedunwantedpoundspermanently.Therest,afterinte
2岁,男孩,生后4个月逐渐出现智力低下,毛发颜色变浅,皮肤白皙,抽搐三次来诊。本病可能的病因是
某新生儿确诊为低钙m症,静脉注射10%葡萄糖碳酸钙。护士要注意观察的是
某法院在审理张某自诉伤害案中,发现被告人还实施过抢劫。对此,下列哪一做法是正确的?(2010—卷二—31,单)
[背景资料]某综合大楼裙楼幕墙工程1层部分采用全玻璃幕墙,面板为12mm厚单片非镀膜玻璃,玻璃肋采用6+1.14PVB+6mm钢化夹层玻璃,酸性硅酮结构密封胶嵌缝。2~4层局部采用隐框玻璃幕墙。其余均为25mm厚火烧花岗石板短槽式石材幕墙。石板的
根据农业农村部的通知,()武夷岩茶产业集群被列入《2020年优势特色产业集群建设名单》。
Inrecentyears,manyAmericansofbothsexesandvariousageshavebecomeinterestedinimprovingtheirbodies.Theyhavebecom
中国革命胜利的原因是()
HowtoKeepYourNewYear’sResolutions[A]AbouthalfofallAmericanadultssaytheyareatleastsomewhatlikelytomakeaNew
最新回复
(
0
)