首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came
admin
2015-08-29
45
问题
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came up with the ethical theory known as utilitarianism. The goal of this theory is encapsulated in Bentham’s aphorism that "the greatest happiness of the greatest number is the foundation of morals and legislation."
It all sounds fine and dandy until you start applying it to particular cases. A utilitarian, for example, might approve of the occasional torture of suspected terrorists—for the greater happiness of everyone else, you understand. That type of observation has led Daniel Bartels at Columbia University and David Pizarro at Cornell to ask what sort of people actually do have a utilitarian outlook on life. Their answers, just published in Cognition, are not comfortable.
One of the classic techniques used to measure a person’s willingness to behave in a utilitarian way is known as trolleyology.
The subject of the study is challenged with thought experiments involving a runaway railway trolley or train carriage. All involve choices, each of which leads to people’s deaths. For example: there are five railway workmen in the path of a runaway carriage. The men will surely be killed unless the subject of the experiment, a bystander in the story, does something. The subject is told he is on a bridge over the tracks. Next to him is a big, heavy stranger. The subject is informed that his own body would be too light to stop the train, but that if he pushes the stranger onto the tracks, the stranger’s large body will stop the train and save the five lives. That, unfortunately, would kill the stranger.
Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro knew from previous research that around 90% of people refuse the utilitarian act of killing one individual to save five. What no one had previously inquired about, though, was the nature of the remaining 10%.
To find out, the two researchers gave 208 undergraduates a battery of trolleyological tests and measured, on a four-point scale, how utilitarian their responses were. Participants were also asked to respond to a series of statements intended to get a sense of their individual psychologies. These statements included, "I like to see fist fights", "The best way to handle people is to tell them what they want to hear", and "When you really think about it, life is not worth the effort of getting up in the morning". Each was asked to indicate, for each statement, where his views lay on a continuum that had "strongly agree" at one end and "strongly disagree" at the other. These statements, and others like them, were designed to measure, respectively, psychopathy, Machiavellianism and a person’s sense of how meaningful life is.
Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro then correlated the results from the trolleyology with those from the personality tests. They found a strong link between utilitarian answers to moral dilemmas(push the fat guy off the bridge)and personalities that were psychopathic, Machiavellian or tended to view life as meaningless. Utilitarians, this suggests, may add to the sum of human happiness, but they are not very happy people themselves.
That does not make utilitarianism wrong. Crafting legislation—one of the main things that Bentham and Mill wanted to improve—inevitably involves riding roughshod over someone’s interests. Utilitarianism provides a plausible framework for deciding who should get trampled. The results obtained by Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro do, though, raise questions about the type of people who you want making the laws. Psychopathic, Machiavellian misanthropes? Apparently, yes.
The phrase "riding roughshod over" in the last paragraph probably means
选项
A、reflecting upon.
B、resting upon.
C、trampling upon.
D、looking upon.
答案
C
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/MzKO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
WhichofthefollowingisNOTaU.K.newspaper?
Britainhasthefollowingpapersexcept______.
TheproblemsfacinglearnersofEnglishcanbedividedintothreebroadcategories:a)【1】problems,someofwhichinvolvefear
HowtoReduceStressLifeisfullofthingsthatcauseusstress.Thoughwemaynotlikestress,wehavetolivewithit.I.De
Aproblem-relatedtothecompetitionforlanduseiswhethercropsshouldbeusedtoproducefoodorfuel.【1】______areaswill
WhatdegreeisofferedincommunitycollegesintheUnitedStates?
ThemajorityofpoeminLyricalBalladswerewrittenby______.
InformationSuperhighwayatWorkThechangesinhowwecommunicatemakeitnecessarytochangehowwethinkaboutcommunicat
Oneofthefirstthingsthatshouldstrikeanyhalfobservantparentisthespeedandapparentaccuracyinwhichachildproceed
WhatdoestheCongressplantodoinAugust?
随机试题
技术
甲公司拥有一项关于自动洗衣机的实用新型专利。乙电器厂未经甲公司同意大量生产和销售与甲公司专利产品结构相同的产品,并在其产品上标注了甲公司的专利号,但乙电器厂产品所用的材料与甲公司不同。乙电器厂的行为()
以下不属于期货交易所职能的是()。
证券公司应建立以净资本为核心的风险控制指标体系,加强证券公司内部控制、防范风险。()
我国老一辈国家领导人对翻译导游人员提出了很高的要求,要求他们必须“三过硬”,即()
如果李凯拿到钥匙,他就会把门打开并且保留钥匙。如果杨林拿到钥匙,他会把钥匙交到失物招领处。要么李凯拿到钥匙,要么杨林拿到钥匙。如果上述信息正确,那么下列哪项一定正确?
从所给的四个选项中,选择最合适的一个填入问号处,使之呈现一定的规律性:
DorothyCrowfootHodgkinWhenDorothyCrowfootHodgkinwastenyearsold,shewatchedherfirstcrystalsformonastringda
()亚洲司司长()执行秘书()总司令()省长
Withrapidgrowthofworldpopulation,mainlyindevelopingcountries,theavailablecultivablelandperpersonhasdeclinedste
最新回复
(
0
)