首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came
admin
2015-08-29
34
问题
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came up with the ethical theory known as utilitarianism. The goal of this theory is encapsulated in Bentham’s aphorism that "the greatest happiness of the greatest number is the foundation of morals and legislation."
It all sounds fine and dandy until you start applying it to particular cases. A utilitarian, for example, might approve of the occasional torture of suspected terrorists—for the greater happiness of everyone else, you understand. That type of observation has led Daniel Bartels at Columbia University and David Pizarro at Cornell to ask what sort of people actually do have a utilitarian outlook on life. Their answers, just published in Cognition, are not comfortable.
One of the classic techniques used to measure a person’s willingness to behave in a utilitarian way is known as trolleyology.
The subject of the study is challenged with thought experiments involving a runaway railway trolley or train carriage. All involve choices, each of which leads to people’s deaths. For example: there are five railway workmen in the path of a runaway carriage. The men will surely be killed unless the subject of the experiment, a bystander in the story, does something. The subject is told he is on a bridge over the tracks. Next to him is a big, heavy stranger. The subject is informed that his own body would be too light to stop the train, but that if he pushes the stranger onto the tracks, the stranger’s large body will stop the train and save the five lives. That, unfortunately, would kill the stranger.
Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro knew from previous research that around 90% of people refuse the utilitarian act of killing one individual to save five. What no one had previously inquired about, though, was the nature of the remaining 10%.
To find out, the two researchers gave 208 undergraduates a battery of trolleyological tests and measured, on a four-point scale, how utilitarian their responses were. Participants were also asked to respond to a series of statements intended to get a sense of their individual psychologies. These statements included, "I like to see fist fights", "The best way to handle people is to tell them what they want to hear", and "When you really think about it, life is not worth the effort of getting up in the morning". Each was asked to indicate, for each statement, where his views lay on a continuum that had "strongly agree" at one end and "strongly disagree" at the other. These statements, and others like them, were designed to measure, respectively, psychopathy, Machiavellianism and a person’s sense of how meaningful life is.
Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro then correlated the results from the trolleyology with those from the personality tests. They found a strong link between utilitarian answers to moral dilemmas(push the fat guy off the bridge)and personalities that were psychopathic, Machiavellian or tended to view life as meaningless. Utilitarians, this suggests, may add to the sum of human happiness, but they are not very happy people themselves.
That does not make utilitarianism wrong. Crafting legislation—one of the main things that Bentham and Mill wanted to improve—inevitably involves riding roughshod over someone’s interests. Utilitarianism provides a plausible framework for deciding who should get trampled. The results obtained by Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro do, though, raise questions about the type of people who you want making the laws. Psychopathic, Machiavellian misanthropes? Apparently, yes.
The phrase "riding roughshod over" in the last paragraph probably means
选项
A、reflecting upon.
B、resting upon.
C、trampling upon.
D、looking upon.
答案
C
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/MzKO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Alotofpeoplebelievethattelevisionhasaharmfuleffectonchildren.Afewyearsago,thesamecriticismsweremadeofthe
Thereiswidespreadconsensusamongscholarsthatsecondlanguageacquisition(MB1SLA)emergedasadistinctfieldofresearchfro
Thereiswidespreadconsensusamongscholarsthatsecondlanguageacquisition(MB1SLA)emergedasadistinctfieldofresearchfro
ThethirteenformerBritishcoloniesinNorthAmericadeclaredindependencefromGreatBritainin_____.
WhichofthefollowingistheFrench-speakingcityinCanada?
Theairportoriginallydecidedtocoveruptheposterbecause_____.
HowtoReduceStressLifeisfullofthingsthatcauseusstress.Thoughwemaynotlikestress,wehavetolivewithit.I.De
Florida’spopulationgrowthowesmuchtoitsattractivenessbothasaplaceof______andasaconvenientplacefor______withcent
Nowthetrumpetsummonsusagain—notasacalltobeararms,thougharmsweneed;notasacalltobattle,thoughembattledwea
AplainclothesNewYorkCitypoliceofficerwasshotinthefaceatTuesday1.______nightwhilepursuingamanataBrooklyn
随机试题
严禁在分散控制系统中使用非分散控制系统的软件。
男性,37岁。左上后牙进食冷热饮食和咬硬物时酸痛1周。无自发痛。口腔检查:左上67磨损达牙本质,探诊酸痛。温度刺激试验酸痛,刺激去除后症状即刻消失。不松动,牙周检查(-)。首选的治疗措施是
A.CD2B.CD3C.CD4D.CD8E.CD19
A.发散风寒、和中止呕B.发汗解表、利水消肿C.发散风寒、消肿排脓D.发散风寒、胜湿止痛E.发散风寒、宣通鼻窍
在Excel中,新建工作簿,可以()。
内部衡量法涉及的四个基本参数中不需要由银行内部估计的是( )。
若把学问譬作建筑材料,那智慧便是建筑师的匠心。只有木、石、水泥钢筋,决不能成为房子;就是懂得材料力学、结构原理,也只可以造成普通的房子,而决不能造成庄严壮丽的罗马圣彼得或巴黎圣母教堂。这种绝代的美术作品,是要靠艺术家的匠心的。但是材料愈能应手,匠心愈能发挥
乙基于强奸故意正在对妇女实施暴力,甲出于义愤对乙进行攻击,客观上阻止了乙的强奸行为。观点:①正当防卫不需要有防卫认识②正当防卫只需要防卫认识,即只要求防卫人认识到不法侵害正在进行③正当防卫只需要防卫意志,即只要求防卫人具有保护合法权益的意图④正当防
计算机中指令的执行过程可以概括为以下步骤:第一步:读取指令。把(34)中的内容经(35)送入内存的有关寄存器,读出内存中存储的指令并将其送入(36)。第二步:指令译码。(36)中的操作码部分送指令译码器产生相应的操作控制信号,地址码部分则(
A、Womenstartlearningwhentheyarepastschoolage.B、Therearemoreilliteratewomenthanmen.C、Alloftheilliteratewomen
最新回复
(
0
)