首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
The End of AIDS? [A] On June 5th 1981 America’s Centres for Disease Control and Prevention reported the outbreak of an unusual f
The End of AIDS? [A] On June 5th 1981 America’s Centres for Disease Control and Prevention reported the outbreak of an unusual f
admin
2017-01-16
64
问题
The End of AIDS?
[A] On June 5th 1981 America’s Centres for Disease Control and Prevention reported the outbreak of an unusual form of pneumonia (肺炎) in Los Angeles. When, a few weeks later, its scientists noticed a similar cluster of a rare cancer called Kaposi’s sarcoma (肉瘤) in San Francisco, they suspected that something strange and serious was coming. That something was AIDS.
[B] Since then, 25m people have died from AIDS and another 34m are infected. The 30th anniversary of the disease’s discovery has been taken by many as an occasion for hand-wringing. Yet the war on AIDS is going far better than anyone dared hope. A decade ago, half of the people in several southern African countries were expected to die of AIDS. Now, the death rate is dropping. In 2005 the disease killed 2.1m people. In 2009, the most recent year for which data are available, the number was 1.8m. Some 5m lives have already been saved by drug treatment. In 33 of the worst-affected countries the rate of new infections is down by 25% or more from its peak.
[C] Even more hopeful is a recent study which suggests that the drugs used to treat AIDS may also stop its transmission. If that proves true, the drugs could acliieve much of what a vaccine (疫苗) would. The question for the world will no longer be whether it can wipe out the plague, but whether it is prepared to pay the price.
The appliance of science
[D] If AIDS is defeated, it will be thanks to an alliance of science, activism and unselfishness. The science has come from the world’s drug companies, which leapt on the problem. In 1996 a batch of similar drugs, all of them inhibiting the activity of one of the AIDS virus’s crucial enzymes (霉素), appeared almost simultaneously. The effect was miraculous, if you (or your government) could afford the $15,000 a year that those drugs cost when they first came on the market.
[E] Much of the activism came from rich-world gays. Having persuaded drug companies into creating the new medicines, the activists bullied them into dropping the price. That would have happened anyway, but activism made it happen faster. The unselfishness was aroused as it became clear by the mid-1990s that AIDS was not just a rich-world disease. Three-quarters of those affected were—and still are—in Africa. Unlike most infections, which strike children and the elderly, AIDS hits the most productive members of society: businessmen, civil servants, engineers, teachers, doctors, nurses. Thanks to an enormous effort by Western philanthropists (慈善家) and some politicians (this is one area where even the left should give credit to George Bush junior), a series of programmes has brought drugs to those infected.
[F] The result is unsatisfactory. Not enough people—some 6.6m of the 16m who would most quickly benefit—are getting the drugs. And the pills are not a cure. Stop taking them, and the virus bounces back. But it is a huge step forward from ten years ago.
[G] What can science offer now? A few people’s immune systems control the disease naturally, which suggests a vaccine might be possible, and antibodies have been discovered that neutralise the virus and might thus form the basis of AIDS-clearing drugs. But a cure still seems a long way off. Prevention is, for the moment, the better bet.
A question of money
[H] In the early days scientists were often attacked by activists for being more concerned with trying to prevent the epidemic spreading than treating the affected. Now it seems that treatment and prevention will come in the same pill. If you can stop the virus reproducing in someone’s body, you not only save his life, you also reduce the number of viruses for him to pass on. Get enough people on drugs and it would be like vaccinating them: the chain of transmission would be broken.
[I] That is a huge task. It is not just a matter of bringing in those who should already be on the drugs (the 16m who show symptoms or whose immune systems are critically weak). To prevent transmission, treatment would in theory need to be expanded to all the 34m people infected with the disease. That would mean more effective screening, which is planned already, and also a willingness by those without the symptoms to be treated. That willingness might be there, though, if it would protect people’s uninfected lovers.
[J] Such a programme would take years and also cost a lot of money. About $16 billion a year is spent on AIDS in poor and middle-income countries. Half is generated locally and half is foreign aid. A report in this week’s Lancet suggests a carefully crafted mixture of approaches that does not involve treating all those without symptoms would bring great benefit for not much more than this—a peak of $22 billion in 2015, and a fall thereafter. Moreover, most of the extra spending would be offset by savings on the treatment of those who would have been infected, but were not—some 12m people, if the scientists have done their sums right. At $500 per person per year, the benefits would far outweigh the costs in purely economic terms: though donors will need to compare the gain from spending more on knocking out AIDS against other worthy causes, such as eliminating malaria (疟疾).
[K] For the moment, the struggle is to stop some rich countries giving less. The Netherlands and Spain are cutting their contributions to the Global Fund, one of the two main distributors of the life-saving drugs, and Italy has stopped paying altogether. On June 8th the United Nations meets to discuss what to do next. Those who see the UN as a mere talking-shop should remember that its first meeting on AIDS launched the Global Fund. It is still a long haul. But AIDS can be beaten. A plague that 30 years ago was blamed on man’s wickedness has ended up showing him in a better, more inventive and generous light.
Unlike most infectious diseases that hit the weak members, AIDS strikes the most capable members of society.
选项
答案
E
解析
本题涉及艾滋病的感染对象,由Unlike,hit,strikes,members of society可以定位到E段倒数第2句。原文提到大部分传染病侵袭的是儿童和老年人,而艾滋病则侵袭社会中最具劳动力的成员,题中的weak members对应原文的children and the elderly,而capable则对应productive,故本题信息出自E段。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/Nbi7777K
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
AboutoneintwentyadultsintheUnitedStatescannotreadEnglish.Anewfederalstudyshowsthatadultsmadelittleprogress
AboutoneintwentyadultsintheUnitedStatescannotreadEnglish.Anewfederalstudyshowsthatadultsmadelittleprogress
AboutoneintwentyadultsintheUnitedStatescannotreadEnglish.Anewfederalstudyshowsthatadultsmadelittleprogress
A、Theywelcomedthepublicityinthemedia.B、Theyavoidedappearingontelevision.C、Theyreleasedavideoofhisprogress.D、T
Somepeoplesaythetraditionalcalendarof180daysnolongermeetstheneedsofAmericansociety.Theypointoutthatstudents
PerhapsbecausegoingtocollegeissomuchapartoftheAmericandream,manypeoplegoforno【B1】______reason.Somegobecause
A、PartsofAustraliaandRussia.B、PartsofCanadaandsouthernEurope.C、PartsofNorthAmericaandSouthAfrica.D、PartsofWe
随机试题
PASSAGEONEWhatdoesthenarratormeanby"Iknowhowthosethingsgo"(Para.11)?
Word2000定时自动保存功能的作用是
A.夺气B.少气C.谵语D.短气中气大虚的表现是
对于下列纠纷的解决,可以适用《合同法》的有( )。
6月5日,某投资者在大连商品交易所开仓卖出玉米期货合约40手,成交价为2220元/吨,当日结算价格为2230元/吨,交易保证金比例为5%,则该客户当天须缴纳的保证金为()。
以下不符合个人耐用消费品贷款的贷款对象须满足条件的是()。
甲上市公司股东大会于20×1年11月4日作出决议,准备改造公司厂房。为此,甲公司于20×1年12月5日向银行借入三年期借款1000万元,年利率为8%,利息按年支付。款项于当日划入甲公司银行存款账户。同时甲公司还有两笔一般借款,一笔是20×0年5月1日从A
制定学期教字计划的要求是什么?
过度消费是指超出一定界限,与经济发展水平不相适应的消费水平,在我国主要有三种突出类型:超前消费、炫耀性消费和病态消费。其中炫耀性消费并不是为了满足个人消费的需求.而是通过一种消费方式向他人炫耀和展示自己的金钱财力和社会地位。根据上述定义,下列属于炫耀性消费
Wheredoesthisconversationmostprobablytakeplace?
最新回复
(
0
)