首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Our present generation of cultural critics, arriving after the assault of postmodernism and the increasingly widespread commerci
Our present generation of cultural critics, arriving after the assault of postmodernism and the increasingly widespread commerci
admin
2015-01-09
46
问题
Our present generation of cultural critics, arriving after the assault of postmodernism and the increasingly widespread commercialization of culture, has been cast adrift, without any firm basis for judgments. Publications and institutions to support serious criticism, in this view, either no longer exist or are few in number.
Critics today, it is also claimed, are too cozy behind the ivied walls of academe, content to employ a prose style that is decipherable only to a handful of the cognoscente. The deadly dive of university critics into the shallow depths of popular culture, moreover, reveals the unwillingness of these critics to uphold standards. Even if the reasons offered are contradictory, these Jeremiahs huddle around their sad conclusion that serious cultural criticism has fallen into a morass of petty bickering and bloated reputations.
Such narratives of declension, a staple of American intellectual life since the time of the Puritans, are misplaced, self-serving, and historically inaccurate, and difficult to prove. Has the level of criticism declined in the last 50 years? Of course the logic of such an opinion depends on the figures that are being contrasted with one another. Any number of cultural critics thriving today could be invoked to demonstrate. That cultural criticism is alive and well.
But many new and thriving venues for criticism and debate exist today, and they are not limited solely to the discussion of literary works. Actually, they became so encrusted with their own certitude and political judgments that they became largely irrelevant. Today the complaint is that literary culture lacks civility. We live in an age of commercialism and spectacle. Writers seek the limelight, and one way to bask in it is to publish reviews that scorch the landscape, with Dale Peck as the fatuous, but not atypical, case in point. Heidi Julavits, in an essay in The Believer, lamented the downfall of serious fiction and reviewing. She surveyed a literary culture that had embraced "snark", her term for hostile, self-serving reviews.
The snark review, according to Julavits, eschews a serious engagement with literature in favor of a sound-bite approach, an attempt to turn the review into a form of entertainment akin to film reviews or restaurant critiques. A critic found cultural criticism to be in "critical condition". For him, the postmodern turn to, theory, in its questioning of objectivity, cut the critical, independent ground out from under reviewers. The rise of chain bookstores and blockbuster best sellers demeaned literary culture, making it prey to the commercial values of the market and entertainment.
The criticism does not seem discontinuous. Nor should we forget that civility rarely reigned in the circles of New York intellectuals. The art critic Clement Greenberg physically pummeled the theater critic Lionel Abel after Abel rejected the view that Jean Wahl, the French philosopher, was anti-Semitic. Though Robert Peck has the reputation of a literary hatchet man, so far as I know his blows thus far have all been confined to the printed page.
Cultural criticism has certainly changed over the years. The old days of the critic who wielded unchallenged authority have happily passed. Ours is a more pluralistic age, one not beholden to a narrow literary culture. The democratization of criticism — as in the Amazon system of readers’ evaluating books—is a messy affair, as democracy must be. But the solution to the problems of criticism in the present is best not discovered in the musty basements of nostalgia and sentiment for the cultural criticism of a half-century gone. Rather the solution is to recognize, as John Dewey did almost a century ago, that the problems of democracy demand more democracy, less nostalgia for a golden age that never was, and a spirit of openness to what is new and invigorating in our culture.
What does "the snark review" refer to according to Heidi Julavits?
选项
A、Cultural reviews which are unfriendly and selfless
B、Literary reviews avoiding serious criticism
C、Entertainment reviews in the film industry
D、Postmodern reviews independent of objectivity
答案
A
解析
细节题。本题的解题点在文章的第四段最后一句“She surveyed a literary culture that had embraced“snark”,her term for hostile,self-serving reviews.”此句中的She指的就是Heidi Julavits,此句中的hostile、self-serving与A选项中的“unfriendly”、“selfless”的意思正好相对应,所以正确答案是A选项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/NfQO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
WhenaScottishresearchteamstartledtheworldbyrevealingthreemonthsagothatithadclonedanadultsheep,PresidentClin
Manymentalinstitutionsthroughoutthecountryhavebeenturnedintodumpinggroundsforthousandsofoldsterswhohavenoplac
Faces,likefingerprints,areunique.Didyou【C1】______wonderhowitispossibleforusto【C2】______people?Evenaskilledwrite
Usingpopularathletestoendorseandpitchcompaniesandtheirproductshasbecomecommonplaceinadvertising.U.S.companiesp
ThepanelwillconsiderwhetherornotMr.Wilsonhasbeen______seriousprofessionalmisconduct.
Theworldisundergoingtremendouschanges.Theriseofglobalization,bothaneconomicandculturaltrendthathassweptthroug
新的一年才刚刚开始,你就发现很难坚持“告别垃圾食品、远离沙发、戒烟”这些新年决心了吧?我们很难改掉坏习惯是由于生物学的原因——这些坏习惯根植于我们的大脑中。【T1】这并不是让人放弃新年决心的借口。了解不健康的习惯怎样变得根深蒂固可以启发科学家研究
Patientstendtofeelindignantandinsultedifthephysiciantellsthemhecanfindnoorganiccauseforthepain.Theytendto
Today’sworkerisnolongerwillingtoworkinanauthoritariananddehumanizingenvironment.Workerswantmeaningintheirwork
俗话说,牙疼不是病,但疼起来真要命。前些日子我突然开始牙疼,随便找了点止疼药,希望赶紧止住疼痛。可试了好些天都不管用,最后还是得找牙医。
随机试题
如果你想实现自己的目标,你可不能忽视努力奋斗。
以下无牙颌印模范围的要求,哪项不正确()
某律师事务所一审代理了原告张某的案件。一年后,该案再审。该所的下列哪一做法与律师执业规范相冲突?(2014年卷一第48题,单选)
某写字楼项目于2009年3月1日领取了施工许可证,若因故未能按期开工,应向发证机关申请延期,最多可延期()次。
蓄电池室内应有运行检修通道。两侧均装设蓄电池时,通道宽度不应小于()。
骨质疏松症是一种退行性骨代谢性疾病,一般随年龄增长,患病风险增加。正常来说,人体在40岁左右时骨量会达到最高值,随后骨骼钙质开始慢慢流失。从近几年门诊、住院的情况来看,大部分出现骨钙质流失的年轻人有一个共同点:都有爱喝碳酸饮料和咖啡的习惯。由此有人说喝碳酸
思想是时代的光芒。伟大的时代孕育伟大的思想,伟大的思想照亮时代的航向。党的十九大以如椽巨笔书写了民族复兴的“未来简史”,灵魂是()
属于安全攻击中的被动攻击的是
Lookatthenotesbelow.Someinformationismissing.YouwillhearamantelephoningHumanResourcesaboutdetailsofo
ThisisMattDrudge,millionairefounderandowneroftheDrudgeReport,thefirstandmostsuccessfulonline’newspaper’.Peop
最新回复
(
0
)