A、Nuclear energy is environmentally friendly. B、Nuclear energy is indispensable to mankind. C、Fossil fuels cause pollution to th

admin2006-07-14  27

问题  
No nuclear or new nuclear? It is a big question for energy policy these days. In Britain, where managerial incompetence and negligence over safety have fuelled a crisis of confidence in two big nuclear operators, an anti-nuclear lobby is calling for all nuclear plants to be shut. In Japan, similar problems have led to a contemporary shutdown of most nuclear plants that could trigger a wave of blackouts this summer. But in China and South Africa, governments have given their blessing to new nuclear plants; and the Bush administration’s energy plan also sup ports the idea.
    The case for nuclear today has two main components: energy security and climate change. The first argues against shutting nuclear plants, and for opening new ones, on the ground that getting rid of nuclear would make the rich world even more dependent on imported fossil fuels. The second argues that, unless nuclear plants are replaced with new ones when they go out of service, more fossil fuels, notably coal, will be burnt, making it impossible for governments to tackle global warming.

选项 A、Nuclear energy is environmentally friendly.
B、Nuclear energy is indispensable to mankind.
C、Fossil fuels cause pollution to the ecological environment.
D、Governments are divided in their energy policy.

答案D

解析 本题要求恰当地概括全文的主要思想。本文首先举例说明英国和日本对建立核电站持不赞成的态度,而接下来文中也谈到中国和南非赞成建立核电站的立场。由此可知,全文主要说明各国政府在能源政策上是有分歧的。因此选项d的说法符合原文,是正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/OF0O777K
0

最新回复(0)