2. 考研
  3. How can British train operators possibly justify yet another increase to rail passenger fares? It has become a grimly reliable a

How can British train operators possibly justify yet another increase to rail passenger fares? It has become a grimly reliable a

admin2021-03-11  19
问题         How can British train operators possibly justify yet another increase to rail passenger fares? It has become a grimly reliable annual ritual: every January the cost of travelling by train rises, imposing a significant extra burden on those who have no option but to use the rail network to get to work or otherwise.This year’s rise, an average of 2.7 percent, may be a fraction lower than last year’s, but it is still well above the official Consumer Price Index (CPI) measure of inflation.
        Successive governments have permitted such increases on the grounds that the cost of investing in and running the rail network should be borne by those who use it, rather than the general taxpayer.Why, the argument goes, should a car-driving pensioner from Lincolnshire have to subsidise the daily commute of a stockbroker from Surrey? Equally, there is a sense that the travails of commuters in the South East, many of whom will face among the biggest rises, have received too much attention compared to those who must endure the relatively poor infrastructure of the Midlands and the North.
        However, over the past 12 months, those commuters have also experienced some of the worst rail strikes in years.It is all very well train operators trumpeting the improvements they are making to the network, but passengers should be able to expect a basic level of service for the substantial sums they are now paying to travel.The responsibility for the latest wave of strikes rests on the unions.However, there is a strong case that those who have been worst affected by industrial action should receive compensation for the disruption they have suffered.
        The Government has pledged to change the law to introduce a minimum service requirement so that even when strikes occur, services can continue to operate.This should form part of a wider package of measures to address the long-running problems on Britain’s railways.Yes, more investment is needed, but passengers will not be willing to pay more indefinitely if they must also endure cramped, unreliable services punctuated by regular chaos when timetables are changed, or planned maintenance is managed incompetently.The threat of nationalisation may have been seen off for now, but it will return with a vengeance if the justified anger of passengers is not addressed in short order.
The stockbroker in Paragraph 2 is used to stand for_______.
选项 A、car drivers
B、rail travellers
C、local investors
D、ordinary taxpayers
答案B
解析 根据题干关键信息stockbroker和paragraph2可以定位到原文第二段。该段第一、第二句提到“Successive governments have permitted such increases on the grounds that the cost of investing in and running the rail network should be borne by those who use it, rather than the general taxpayer.Why, the argument goes，should a car-driving pensioner from Lincolnshire have to subsidise the daily commute of a stockbroker from Surrey”，即历届政府都允许这种增长,理由是投资和运营铁路网的成本应由使用铁路网的人承担,而不是由一般纳税人承担。他们认为,为什么一个在林肯郡领养老金的汽车司机必须补贴一个从萨里郡来的股票经纪人每天的通勤费用?由此可知,一般纳税人对应的是领养老金的汽车司机,使用铁路网的人对应的是股票经纪人,故选B。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/Or1Z777K
0

考研英语一

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)