首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Informed public debate critical to future of genomic medicine Just mentioning "stem-cell research" or "genomic medicine" can
Informed public debate critical to future of genomic medicine Just mentioning "stem-cell research" or "genomic medicine" can
admin
2012-11-22
112
问题
Informed public debate critical to future of genomic medicine
Just mentioning "stem-cell research" or "genomic medicine" can open a floodgate of beliefs, concerns and, misinformation. Opinions are varied, mixed with fact and fiction, but one thing is clear: Open dialogue among researchers, teachers and the general public must continue as we struggle to define the relationship between our societal values and lifesciences research.
When the University of Washington .and the National Human Genome Research Institute hosted a community genetics forum last spring, questions abounded from the standing-room-only crowd about the implications of genetic research.
When is information about genetic health risks most helpful? Should genetic testing results be part of medical records and how would the results be used potentially by insurance companies? How can genetic testing benefit the criminal-justice system, such as establishings guilt or innocence using DNA testing,
The Human Genome Project will lead to amazing advances in medical science that will result in earlier diagnosis, more-targeted treatment, and a dramatic improvement in our ability to prevent terrible diseases. Genomic medicine will mean more personalized medicine tailored to the individual.
But these advances also carry inherent risks.
The obvious benefits of "personalized medicine" —use of genetic tests to guide preventive care and better drug prescribing—are counterbalanced by the possibility that such tests could lead to discrimination by insurers or employers. And, since genetic risk is often only one of the contributing factors to disease, overemphasis on personalized medicine could burden our health-care system with genetic tests of little or no benefit.
For example, smoking, diet and exercise play major roles in the risk of diabetes and heart disease. Identification of a genetic risk for these diseases can provide specific information for more-effective preventive care, but should not detract from pursuit of a healthy lifestyle.
The greatest health benefits of genomic research likely will come from insights into the basic biology of health and disease. This will ultimately lead to improved prevention and treatment—often without any need for genetic testing—for many diseases. The outcome from this research can be "precision medcine" —a morecost-effective approach to providing high-quality care. Thus, genomic medicine has the potential to improve the value of health care.
An example of the potential of genomic medicine to improve quality and reduce cost is the work of UW researchers Mark Rieder, Allan Rettie and Debbie Nickerson. They recently reported the discovery of a genetic method for accurately determining the proper dosage of a common blood-thinning drug, warfarin, which often produces adverse side effects because of its highly variable activity in patients.
Millions of people worldwide take worldwide to prevent stroke and blood clots, yet require expensive, constant testing from their physician to ensure proper dosage. These scientists’ findings illustrate how the powerful DNA analysis tools of the Human Genome Project are leading to a new era of tailoring drugs and therapies to an individual’s genome. Genomic medicine can lead to more-precise, personalized and cost- effective health care.
Medical advances always involve risk of harm, and genomic medicine is no exception. While technical issues require scientific research, we believe the challenges posed by genetic testing are far too critical to be left to the deliberation of scientists alone.
All members of society should have the opportunity to engage in collaborative discussion about the benefits and harms of genetic testing. Informed public discussion is vital to continue advances that hold so much promise for improving the value of health care.
Both educational resources and major organizational efforts will be needed to create opportunities for open discussion. But the most important resources are people’s time and their willingness to invest it in these discussions.
Researchers, teachers and the media have an obligation to create opportunities for sharing accurate, well-balanced information about potential uses of genomic technology.
The greatest health benefits of genomic research will come from insights into the basic biology of health and disease.
选项
A、Y
B、N
C、NG
答案
B
解析
从第八段第一句可知
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/P2w7777K
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
Manypeopleviewretirementasatimetostopworking.Butnewresearchshowsthatpeoplewhotakeonfull-orpart-timejobsaft
ApaperpublishedbytworesearchersattheUniversityofLondonclaimstoprovethatmusicaffectsourresponsestovisualimag
TheUnitedStatesgovernmentwantstoknowwhatthepublicthinksaboutitsfindingsonthesafetyof【36】animals.TheFooda
Ifyouarealways______byuncertaintyindoinganything,you’llcometonothing.
Thegreatleadersoftheworldhavealways______theirprinciples.
Hisstrongsenseofhumormakeseveryoneintheroom______outlaughing.
DriventothebrinkofsuicidebytheXianlotteryscandal,acheatedfarmerreflectsshakenpublicconfidence______theintegri
Everybodywastestime.Insteadofdoinghishomework,theschoolboywatches【36】.Insteadofwritingher【37】,thestudentgoesou
Soonafterstartinghisjobassuperintendent(监管人)oftheMemphis,Term.,publicschools,KrinerCashorderedanassessmentof
随机试题
关于小儿腹泻不正确的是
在岩石孔隙中同时有两相以上的流体时,岩石孔隙允许某一相通过的渗透率,称为某相的()。
试述SET支付消息的功能。
急性化脓性腹膜炎的手术指征中,下列错误的是
凝血时间正常值试管法为
患者,男,50岁。腰膝酸软冷痛,小便清长,腹痛便秘。用药宜首选()
对设备监理任务的组织管理就是对这个设备监理项目的管理,它不包括()。
当写字楼、住宅等作为建设工程的最终新产品以商品的形式进入流通领域时,其交易价格是()。
西方法律大多继承了古罗马法。古罗马法规定的基本制度和原则,今天依然起作用的有()。①陪审制度②律师制度③“不告不理”原则④三权分立原则
“角谷猜想”指出,将一个自然数按以下的一个简单规则进行运算:若数为偶数,则除以2:若为奇数,则乘以3加1。将得到的数按该规则重复运算,最终可得1。请在下面程序的每条横线处填写一个语句,使程序的功能完整。(如:输入34,则输出结果为341752261
最新回复
(
0
)