首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
公务员
I have been consistently opposed to feeding a baby regularly. As a doctor, mother and scientist in child development, I believe
I have been consistently opposed to feeding a baby regularly. As a doctor, mother and scientist in child development, I believe
admin
2017-11-08
57
问题
I have been consistently opposed to feeding a baby regularly. As a doctor, mother and scientist in child development, I believe there is nothing to recommend it, from the baby’ s point of view.
Mothers, doctors and nurses alike have no idea of where a baby’s blood sugar level lies. All we know is that a low level is harmful to brain development and makes a baby easily annoyed. In this state, the baby is difficult to calm down and sleep is impossible. The baby asks for attention by crying and searching for food with its mouth.
It is not just unkind but also dangerous to say a four-hourly feeding schedule will make a baby satisfied. The first of the experts to advocate a strict clock-watching schedule was Dr Frederic Truby King who was against feeding in the night. I’ve never heard anything so ridiculous. Baby feeding shouldn’t follow a timetable set by the mum. What is important is feeding a baby in the best way, though it may cause some inconvenience in the first few weeks.
Well, at last we have
copper-bottomed
research that supports demand feeding and points out the weaknesses of strictly timed feeding. The research finds out that babies who are fed on demand do better at school at age 5, 7, 11 and 14, than babies fed according to the clock. By the age of 8, their IQ (智商) scores are four to five percent higher than babies fed by a rigid timetable. This research comes from Oxford and Essex University using a sample (样本) of 10,419 children born in the early 1990s, taking account of parental education, family income, a child’s sex and age, the mother’s health and feeding style. These results don’t surprise me. Feeding according to schedule runs the risk of harming the rapidly growing brain by taking no account of sinking blood sugar levels.
I hope this research will put an end to advocating strictly timed baby feeding practices.
What does the author think about Dr King?
选项
A、He is strict.
B、He is unkind.
C、He has the wrong idea.
D、He sets a timetable for mothers.
答案
C
解析
推断题。根据第三段中的“The first of the experts to advocate a strict clock-watching schedule was Dr Frederic Truby King who was against feeding in the night.I’ve never heard anything so ridiculous.Baby feeding shouldn’t follow a timetable set by the mum.”可知作者反对严格按时喂养婴儿,认为Dr King的观点是荒谬的。故选C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/POQq777K
本试题收录于:
小学英语题库教师公开招聘分类
0
小学英语
教师公开招聘
相关试题推荐
在跳高教学过程中,很多学生会出现臀部或大小腿后侧碰落横杆的错误,下列关于这种错误产生的原因的表述不正确的是()。
Inthepast,manypeopleusedhorsesfortraveling,farmingandotherkindsofwork.Alotpeoplestillliketoridehorses.And
ThedaysofthehunterarealmostoverinIndia.Thisispartlybecausethereispracticallynothinglefttokill,andpartlybe
Aboutthreeyearsago,Ifeltverylonely.Ididn’tlikemyclassmates,myparentsoranyoneelse.Myclassmatesdidn’twantto
Doinghomeworknotonlycanhelpchildrenmastertheknowledgetheyhavelearned,butaslocantraintheirabilitiesofdoingth
Einstein,thefamousscientist,wasborn______March,1892.
Thenew-designedcarisonshownow.Iwonder______.
Iwillalwaysremembermymother’slastfewdaysinthisworld.OnFebruary14th,2000,myclasswentonafieldtriptothe
Peoplehavealwaysbeen______aboutexactlyhowlifeonearthbegan.
jobchancefourthwhyliveeasyhonestgoodinordertocomeoutGoodmorning,ladiesandgent
随机试题
在资产阶级宪法的分权制衡原则中,其三权指的是【】
缺失,可摘局部义齿修复,在下列基托加强措施中,哪项是错的
减少金属镉向农作物的转移的方式是()
患者,男,66岁。突发中上腹疼痛,伴寒战、高热,巩膜黄染,继而神情淡漠、嗜睡,白细胞计数22×109/L,中性粒细胞升高,拟诊为
患者,男,30岁。自服苯巴比妥钠100片,神志障碍20小时。体格检查:深昏迷,呼吸不规则,血压90/60mmmHg,双肺呼吸音清晰,心率118次/min,律齐,无杂音。此时最重要的抢救措施是
SARS的最主要的传播途径是
某市中级人民法院对夏某、宋某、杨某故意杀人一案作出一审判决,夏某不服提出上诉,宋某、杨某未上诉。二审人民法院在审理过程中,被告人夏某因病死亡。对此,二审法院应当如何处理?()
沙盘推演法可以考察,但文件筐测试不能考察的能力是()。
小学低年级学生的思维发展以()占主导位置。
请你谈谈最理想的工作集体应该具备什么条件?
最新回复
(
0
)