首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
7 Things You Can’t Say in Canada Attacking our sacred cows (things or people that cannot be criticized) may turn you into on
7 Things You Can’t Say in Canada Attacking our sacred cows (things or people that cannot be criticized) may turn you into on
admin
2013-05-04
24
问题
7 Things You Can’t Say in Canada
Attacking our sacred cows (things or people that cannot be criticized) may turn you into one looked down upon by all others — but it can also be a lot of fun.
Every culture has its unacknowledged taboos — the things you are forbidden to say or do in polite company, the accepted truths you are not allowed to doubt. You might think that a liberal, open-minded country like Canada would be free of such taboos, but you’d be wrong. In spite of our belief in our own enlightened tolerance, some things are simply not open to debate. If you try, you’re bound to shock the neighbors.
It’s risky to question the wisdom of the tribe. You might get stoned. On the other hand, some people might come near to you very quietly afterwards and confess that they secretly agree.
So here’s a challenge to a few of our nation’s most widely held beliefs. You say these things in public at your own danger. I will be elaborating on these points over the months to come. Feel free to stone me or secretly agree — or, even better, add to the list. At the very least, they’re sure to start a good dinner-party fight.
Margaret Atwood writes some really awful books.
The queen of Canadian Literature dominates the literary world like a giant. Nobody has won more awards than she has, and nobody is more feared. There is no such a thing as a bad review of a Margaret Atwood book in Canada. That’s too bad, because many of her books are tedious and unreadable, full of tortuous plots and unpleasant characters. Why will no one say so? Because we’re grateful that she’s put us on the global map. If they do, they’ll never work in this country again.
Recycling is a waste of time and money.
Once upon a time it was easy to put out the trash. Today, the Garbage Gestapo rules our lives.
Every household has become a mini version of the village dump, and every one of us has become a garbage picker, carefully separating our organic waste from our bottles and papers, and worrying about where our different kinds of garbage are supposed to go. Don’t try to sort a wine bottle into the wrong bag! The trash police will punish you. The truth about recycling is that it’s a giant waste of dollars and doesn’t help the environment. But don’t tell your kids. They won’t believe you. They’ve been brainwashed.
Only private enterprise can save public health care.
Tommy Douglas, the CBC’s Greatest Canadian, brought us universal health care. But even his plan didn’t originally pay for everybody’s minor diseases, such as ingrown toenails. His primary goal was to make sure nobody faced financial ruin if they got sick. Today we have a system where controlling costs is more important than treating patients, and where ideology is disabling us. In some places, including Toronto, people go blind waiting for cataract (白内障) surgery. The government could restore their sight tomorrow simply by sending them to a private clinic instead of to a hospital. The cost to the government would be exactly the same. But in Canada, private is a dirty word, and so the government would rather you go blind. Poor Tommy would be spinning in his grave.
David Suzuki is bad for the environment.
From global warming to farmed salmon and genetically modified crops, David Suzuki has just one message: The end is near.
He is our homegrown prophet of doom who can predict what will happen in the future. He advocates the essential wickedness of the human race. Like a modern Savonarola, he warns that unless we cast our material possessions into the bonfire, we’re all going to hell.
The trouble with this predicting vision is that people are starting to isolate from the environment. And our hugely expensive investment in the unworkable Kyoto treaty, which Mr. Suzuki tells us doesn’t go nearly far enough, will wipe out more practical measures to cut smog and clean up our waste sites.
A national daycare program won’t do a thing to help poor kids.
Cheap national daycare! Who could be against it? It’s supposed to give kids a better start in life, and nobody can object to that. But in Quebec, where the program started, universal daycare has turned out to be nothing more than a giant (and extremely costly) subsidy for relatively well-off middle-class parents. Few poor parents use the system.
No doubt convenient daycare is a gift set by god for many people. But so far there is no definitive evidence that kids who go to daycare go on to do better in school or in life. So if we want to invest billions in helping kids, why are we spending it on the kids who need help the least?
Group of Seven artists are overexposed genre painters.
I like A.Y. Jackson as much as you do. His paintings remind me of when I went to summer camp. I grew up with a reproduction of The West Wind hanging in our living room. (That was by Tom Thomson, who wasn’t really a member of Group of Seven, but never mind.) Group of Seven were the first artists to depict the wild Canadian landscape, and they were bold young rebels in their time.
But that time was 80 years ago. Today their work is the essence of bourgeois picture-postcard art — the kind of art safe to take your mother to see. Enough, already. Maybe it’s time we moved on.
The United States is the greatest force for good the world has ever known.
Of all the shocking things you can say around the dinner table, this is the most shocking one. After all, America-criticizing is part of our national identity.
At best, we see our neighbor as a well-intentioned but arrogant and wrong-doing bully that throws its weight around too much. At worst, we see our neighbor as one of the most evil nations in the world. And yet, right now, hundreds of millions of people in desperately poor parts of the world are being liberated from millennia of suffering and serfdom. Why? Because of the United States, which has spread its idea of economic freedom — and its purchasing power — around the world.
The aim of Kyoto treaty was to solve______.
选项
A、insurance problems
B、educational problems
C、population problems
D、pollution problems
答案
D
解析
该句提到,And our hugely expensive investment in the unworkable Kyoto treaty,…will wipe out more practical measures to cut smog and clean up our waste sites,由此可知,Kyoto treaty是用来解决污染问题的,故答案为[D]。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/PPB7777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
Therichhavetraditionallypassedtheirwealthontotheirchildren.Butanincreasingnumberofbillionairesarechoosingnot
A、Programsforchildrenandtheold.B、Programsforchildrenandthesick.C、Programsforchildrenandminoritygroups.D、Progra
A、Themanshouldrelaxforawhile.B、Themanshouldseeadoctor.C、Itshouldn’ttakelongtowritetheproposal.D、Themansho
Nowadays,socialnetworkinggetstoomuchattention.Peopleusecyberspacetoshareinformationandconnectwithwhotheythinki
A、Peopledon’tlikeantsverymuch.B、Therearemorepeoplethanants.C、Thetrafficsituationismoreterribleinpeople’slife
A、Adolescentsdefinitelyprefersodasorsportsdrinkstomilk.B、Parentsshouldn’tmakechildrendrinkmilkwhentheywerelitt
A、Speed.B、Concentration.C、Strength.D、Agility.C推理判断题。题目问在所给四个选项中,那位女士认为哪——项对于击剑这项运动不是特别重要。四个选项在对话中都曾先后出现,女士认为concentration,s
______(他很后悔把这次差错归咎到他的秘书头上),becauselaterhefounditwashisownfault.
Forthepasttwoyears,______(我一直忙着准备考试).
TheNecessityofExamination1.考试存在的必要性2.考试也存在弊端3.我的看法
随机试题
电子现金的支付过程包括()
会计电算化环境下,记账凭证摘要可以()。
《荀子·劝学》中说:“学不可以已。青,取之于蓝,而青于蓝;冰,水为之,而寒于水。”这句话主要体现出的哲学原理是()。
我们鼓励社会阶层自然分化,让不同阶层________。我们也鼓励鲤鱼跳龙门,但也应该看到能跃过龙门的“鲤鱼”毕竟是少数。这就需要构建更加公平正义的社会选择机制、甄别机制。只要是锥子,就可以冒出头,当然你也可以__________,让自己冒出头。填入画横线部
简述我国公务员培训的类型。
北京市为缓解交通压力实行机动车辆限行政策,每辆机动车周一到周五都要限行一天,周末不限行。某公司有A、B、C、D、E五辆车,保证每天至少有四辆车可以上路行使。已知:E车周四限行,B车昨天限行,从今天算起,A、C两车连续四天都能上路行使,E车明天可以上路。由此
食品添加剂是为改善食品品质和色、味,以及为防腐、香、保鲜和加工工艺的需要而加入食品中的人工合成或者天然物质营养强化剂、食品用香料、胶基糖果中基础剂物质、食品工业用加工助剂也包括在内。凡是不在《食品添加剂使用标准》(GB2760)名单中的物质都不是食品添加剂
下面对朝向反射的描述,正确的是()
执行x$一InputBox(“请输人x的值”)时,在弹出的对话框巾输入123,在列表框Listl中选中一个列表项(数据为456),使结果为123456的语句是()。
Womenmakeuponly14percentoffullprofessorsinU.S.economicsdepartments.Instarkcontrasttoothersocialscienceswher
最新回复
(
0
)