首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Theories of the value of art are of two kinds, which we may call extrinsic and intrinsic. The first regards art and the apprecia
Theories of the value of art are of two kinds, which we may call extrinsic and intrinsic. The first regards art and the apprecia
admin
2009-06-15
91
问题
Theories of the value of art are of two kinds, which we may call extrinsic and intrinsic. The first regards art and the appreciation of art as means to some recognized moral good, while the second regards them as valuable not instrumentally but as objects unto themselves. It is characteristic of extrinsic theories to locate the value of art in its effects on the person who appreciates it.(46). In this case, it becomes an open question whether there might not be some more effective means of the same result. Alterntively, one may attribute a negative value to art, as Plato did in his republic, arguing that art has a corrupting or desiderative effect on those exposed to it.
The extrinsic approach, adopted in modern times by Leo Tolstoy in What Is Art in 1986, has seldom seemed wholly satisfactory. Philosophers have constantly sought for a value in aresthetic experience that is unique to it and that, therefore, could not be obtained from any other source. The extreme version of this intrinsic approach is that associated with Walter Pater, Oscar Wilde, and the French Symbolists, and summarized in the slogan "art for art’s sake."(47). They also hold that in order to understand art as it should be understood, it is necessary to put aside all interests other than an interest in the work itself.
Between those two extreme views there lies, once again, a host of intermediate positions. We believe, for example, that works of art must be appreciated for their own sake, but that, in the act of apreciation, we gain from them something that is of independent value.(48). Why should not something similar be said of works of art, many of which aspire to be amusing in just the way that good jokes are?
The analogy with laughter...which, in some views, is itself a species of aesthetic interestintroduces a concept without which there can be no serious discussion of the value of art: the concept of taste.(49). We thus begin to think in terms of a distinction between good and bad reasons for laughter. Amusement at the wrong things may seem to us to show corruption of mind, cruelty, or bad taste; and when it does so, we speak of the object as not truly amusing, and feel that we have reason on our side.
Similarly, we regard some works of art as worthy of our attention and others as not. In articulating this judgment, we use all of the diverse and confusing vocabulary of moral appraisal; works of art, like people, are condemned for their sentimentality, coarseness, vulgarity, cruelty, or self-indulgence, and squally praised for their warmth, compassion, nobility, sensitivity, and truthfulness. Clearly, if aesthetic interest has a positive value, its only when motivated the good taste; it is only interest in appropriate objects that can be said to be good for us.(50).
[A] Thus a joke is laughed at for its own sake, even though there is an independent value in laughter, which lightens our lives by taking us momentarily outside ourselves.
[B] All discussion of the value of art tends, therefore, to turn from the outset in the direction of criticism: Can there be genuine critical evaluation of art, a genuine distinction between that which deserves our attention and that which does not?
[C] Art is held to be a form of education, perhaps an education of the emotions.
[D] Artistic appreciation, appreciation, a purely personal matter, calls for appropriate means of expression. Yet, it is before anything a process of "cultivation", during which a certain part of one’s "inner self" is "dug out" and some knowledge of the outside world becomes its match.
[E] If I am amused it is for a reason, and this reason lies in the object of my amusement.
[F] Such thinkers and writers believe that art is not only an end in itself but also a sufficient justification of itself.
选项
答案
F
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/Pi2d777K
本试题收录于:
职称英语卫生类基础题库职称英语分类
0
职称英语卫生类基础
职称英语
相关试题推荐
Therehavebeenmanytechnologicaldevelopmentsinthe20thcentury,forexample,computersandelectricpower.Chooseeitherof
Youarerequiredtowriteanessayabout120wordsonthegiventopic:SmokingIsHazardoustoPeople’sHealth
Readthearticlebelow.Choosethebestsentencefromthelistonthenextpagetofilleachofthegaps.Foreachgap(1
Readthefollowingpassageanddecidewhichanswerbestfitseachspace.Forquestions26~45,markoneletterA,B,CorDo
Usingtheinformationinthetext,completeeachsentence14-18withanexpressionfromthelistbelow.Foreachsentence(14
Facialexpressionscarrymeaning,determinedbycontextsandrelationships.【R1】______Awoman’ssmileatapolicemanwhoisabou
Imagingbeingaskedtospendtwelveorsoyearsofyourlifeinasocietywhichconsistedonlyofmembersofonesex.【R1】______U
Lookatthequestionsforthispart.Youwillhearapassageabout"LivingaLongLife".Youwilllistentoittwice.F
ANEWCRUISESHIPOneofthebiggestpassengershipsinhistory,theIslandPrincess,carriespeopleoncruisesaroundtheCa
A.around50percentofthetotalpopulationinagivencountryB.highestsaturationC.5.8millionD.Britain,Canadaandthe
随机试题
RNA引物在DNA复制过程中的作用是
甲原系一名普通司机,通过努力,受到重视,开始担任某公交公司会计,后因公司部分资金去向不明,主管领导向公安机关报案。侦查过程中,甲某被公安机关以涉嫌职务侵占拘传,在拘传过程中,甲对侦查人员提出的哪项问题有权不予回答?
甲、乙预谋修车后以假币骗付。某日,甲、乙在某汽修厂修车后应付款4,850元,按照预谋甲将4,900元假币递给乙清点后交给修理厂职工丙,乙说:“修得不错,零钱不用找了”,甲、乙随即上车。丙发现货币有假大叫“别走”,甲迅即启动驶向厂门,丙扑向甲车前风档,抓住雨
关于宪法在立法中的作用,下列哪一说法是不正确的?(卷一/2010年第19题)
土壤质地分为()。
居民企业甲公司主要从事日化产品的生产和销售,2014年有关涉税事项如下:(1)为了推广新型洗涤剂,公司推出了“买一赠一”的促销活动,凡购买一件售价40元(不合税)新型洗涤剂的,附赠一瓶原价10元(不含税)的洗洁精。公司按照每件40元确认了新型洗涤剂的销售
某企业的制造费用采用机器工时比例法进行分配。该企业当月生产甲、乙两种产品,共发生制造费用200万元。当月生产甲、乙两种产品共耗用500小时,其中,甲产品耗用300小时,乙产品耗用200小时。则乙产品应分配的制造费用为()万元。
根据《中华人民共和国刑法》,下列关于中止犯处罚的说法正确的是:
各国在对外交往中常常会形成一套相对__________的话语体系,特别是拥有自己的核心话语。对外话语:不仅体现一国的外交政策,更__________了一国对外沟通的基本态度和价值。依次填入画横线部分最恰当的一项是()。
Whatcananexhaustsystemdoifitisefficient?
最新回复
(
0
)