首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Of the great variety of opinions concerning "marriage for money" , the following three are important with reference to the devel
Of the great variety of opinions concerning "marriage for money" , the following three are important with reference to the devel
admin
2011-03-14
53
问题
Of the great variety of opinions concerning "marriage for money" , the following three are important with reference to the development of the importance of money. Marriages based exclusively upon economic motives have not only existed in all periods and at all stages of development, but are particularly common a-mong primitive groups and conditions where they do not cause any offence at all. The disparagement of personal dignity that nowadays arises in every marriage that is not based on personal affection-so that a sense of decency requires the concealment of economic motives-does not exist in simpler cultures. The reason for this development is that increasing individualization makes it increasingly contradictory and discreditable to enter into purely individual relationships for other than purely individual reasons.
For nowadays the choice of a partner in marriage is no longer determined by social motives (though regard for the offspring may be considered to be such a motive) , in so far as society does not insist upon the couple, s equal social status-a condition, however, that provides a great deal of latitude and only rarely leads to conflicts between individual and social interests. In a quite undifferentiated society it may be relatively irrelevant who marries whom, irrelevant not only for the mutual relationship of the couple but also for the offspring. This is because where the constitutions, state of health, temperament, internal and external forms of life and orientations are largely the same within the group, the chance that the children will turn out well depends less upon whether the parents agree and complement each other than it does in highly differentiated society. It therefore seems quite natural and expedient that the choice of the partner should be determined by reasons other than purely individual affection. Yet personal attraction should be decisive in a highly individualized society where a harmonious relationship between two individuals becomes increasingly rare.
The declining frequency of marriage which is to be found everywhere in highly civilized cultural circumstances is undoubtedly due, in part, to the fact that highly differentiated people in general have difficulty in finding a completely sympathetic complement to themselves. Yet we do not possess any other criterion and indication for the advisability of marriage except mutual instinctive attraction. But, happiness is a purely personal matter, decided upon entirely by the couple themselves, and there would be no compelling reason for the official insistence on at least pretending love may be misleading—particularly in the higher strata, whose complicated circumstances often retard the growth of the purest instincts—no matter how much other conditions may affect the final results.it remains true that, with reference to procreation, love is decidedly superior to money as a factor selection. In fact, in this respect.it is the only fight and proper thing.
Marriage for money directly creates a situation of panmixia—the indiscriminate pairing regardless of individual qualities—a condition that biology has demonstrated to be the cause of the most direct and detrimental degeneration of the human species. In the case of marriage for money, the union of a couple is determined by a factor that has absolutely nothing to do with racial appropriateness—just as the regard for money often e-nough keeps apart a couple who really belong together—and it should be considered as a factor in degeneration to the same extent to which the undoubted differentiation of individuals makes selection by personal attraction more and more important. This case too illustrates once more that the increasing individualization within society renders money increasingly unsuitable as a mediator of purely individual relationships.
How is the question of race in relation to marriage similar to the question of money?
选项
A、They fuel mutual instinctual attraction.
B、They inspire individual responsibilities.
C、They deflect superficial relationships.
D、They prohibit suitable marriages.
答案
D
解析
文章指出,金钱、种族都会将真正相爱的人分开。最后一段In the case of marriage for money,theunion of a couple is determined by a factor that has absolutely nothing to do with racial appropriate-ness-just as the regard for money often enough keeps apart a couple who really belong together.
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/PwBO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Afterasharpfallin2000,companyprofitsrecoveredslightlythefollowingyear.
•Readthefollowingpassage.•Arethesentences(16-22)“Right”or“Wrong”?Ifthereisn’tenoughinformationtoanswer“Ri
•Readthefollowingpassage.•Arethesentences(16-22)“Right”or“Wrong”?Ifthereisn’tenoughinformationtoanswer“Ri
MemorandumToRosemaryWimpoleFromDrKittle,ResearchandDevelopmentDate3February1998Re
•Lookatthelistbelow.ItshowsgeneralinformationofNewYorkZoo.•Forquestions6-10decidewhichsection(A-H)oft
AimsofAssetManagementAimofassetmanagementistoachievegreatesteffectivenessandprofitabilityfromproductionand
Potentiallyofferingapowerfulnewtoolagainstterrorism,researchershavefoundanovelwaytodetectdeception:intheliar’
Thisweekmarksthe10thanniversaryoftheAlarapplescare,inwhichmanyAmericanconsumersweredrivenintoapanicfollowin
Thisweekmarksthe10thanniversaryoftheAlarapplescare,inwhichmanyAmericanconsumersweredrivenintoapanicfollowin
随机试题
目前我国开放式基金的估值频率为()。
患者,男性,70岁,右股骨粗隆间骨折,主要依据哪一项与股骨颈骨折鉴别
证券X期望收益率为0.11,贝塔值是1.5,无风险收益率为0.05,市场期望收益率为0.09。根据资本资产定价模型,这个证券()。
下列属于经济结构的有()。
财政收入分配职能主要是()。
小李是一名青少年中心的社会工作者,在工作过程中有时会遇到一些比较顽皮、逆反心理较强的青少年,针对这样的服务对象,小李应决定是否要为他们服务。从操作层面的社会工作价值观来看,他所面临的是()方面的问题。
调解委员会调解劳动争议贯彻自愿原则,具体包括()。
下列有关文学常识的表述错误的一项是()
洪罗市一项对健身爱好者的调查表明,那些称自己每周固定进行二至三次健身锻炼的人近两年来由28%增加到35%,而对该市大多数健身房的调查则显示,近两年来去健身房的人数明显下降。以下各项如果是真的,都有助于解释上述看来矛盾的断定,除了
[*]
最新回复
(
0
)