首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Every year, various organizations and magazines publish college rankings issues in their countries. These rankings often get a l
Every year, various organizations and magazines publish college rankings issues in their countries. These rankings often get a l
admin
2021-02-24
70
问题
Every year, various organizations and magazines publish college rankings issues in their countries. These rankings often get a lot of attention from the media, colleges and college-bound students and their parents. But are these rankings actually a good thing? The following excerpts are opinions from two American experts on this issue.
Write an article of NO LESS THAN 300 words, in which you should:
1. summarize both opinions, and then
2. express your opinion towards college rankings.
Excerpt 1
Philip Altbac, Research Professor in the Lynch School of Education at Boston College
College and university rankings are ubiquitous worldwide. Big decisions are made on the basis of rankings. Students and their families use them for deciding where to study, governments sometimes allocate funds on the basis of rankings and the academic community obsesses over its current score.
In today’s world of mass and competitive higher education, rankings are probably and unfortunately inevitable. But what do the rankings measure? Everything and nothing.
They claim to provide in a single score the essence of quality. But quality cannot be measured easily, and some aspects of educational performance cannot be accurately assessed at all. Research performance is most easily assessed; it is possible to count articles, grants, books and to measure the impact of work in the sciences.
Most rankings rely a lot on measures of reputation, such as asking administrators and academics what they think about various universities. These are notoriously inaccurate. No one has wide knowledge of a range of schools, particularly if asked about institutions in other countries, and subjectivity reigns supreme. Other key variables cannot be accurately gauged. Teaching quality and learning outcomes are among the most problematical—and most important.
Further, one size does not fit all in higher education. Harvard University differs immensely from Bunker Hill Community College, just a few miles away. Rankings generally measure the research universities and neglect the rest. Some of the rankings change their criteria from year to year, thus making it difficult to trace trends over time.
Excerpt 2
Paul Glastris, American journalist and political columnist
I like rankings. So do most students and parents. Rankings provide a quick and easy way for normal, busy people to visually grasp the results of assessments that are often quite complex. We rely on rankings—Zagat for restaurants, Angie’s List for contractors, Consumer Reports for just about everything else—to be our arbiters of quality and value because we don’t have the time or ability to reliably figure out all the products and services in the marketplace on our own.
This is especially true of colleges. Higher education is the biggest investment many people will ever make, and often the most fateful. College is also what economists call an "experience good"— that is, a good or service whose quality isn’t readily apparent until after you’ve consumed it It’s almost impossible to buy an experience good intelligently without some reliable third party assessment.
Though certainly not perfect, popular college rankings are a great way to sift through thousands of universities and find college options that are most in tune with an individual’s wants and needs. In the broadest sense, rankings provide a list of top colleges. This allows prospective students to identify and expand the list of potential 4-year or online schools based on quality of degree programs, majors available, career opportunities and more. For example, if a small school is your priority, you can find a list of the top ten small schools. If you’re primarily looking for a social experience, you can check out the top ten party schools.
选项
答案
College Ranking Is a Blessing The college rankings published annually by various organizations and magazines attract a lot of eyeballs. Whether such conduct is good or not? Supporters, like Mr. Glastris, take it as a beneficial information as it can help students to choose colleges that accord with their preferences conveniently, while professor Altbac attacks the rankings on their criteria which aren’t scientific enough, leading to an inaccurate evaluation of colleges. And the criteria of some rankings vary each year, making it very difficult to follow the change of rankings. Moreover, all the current rankings generally give priority to research universities and neglect others. As far as I’m concerned, college ranking is a blessing based on the following three reasons. Firstly, college rankings give people a direct and fast way of distinguishing thousands of universities around the world. As going to college is a major investment for most families, college rankings published in major media will make more data available to people who are intended to make sensible and efficient choices. Secondly, in response to the attack on the validity of the rankings, i.e. the criteria chosen, I believe that different rankings must have considered different criteria which will provide a relatively comprehensive picture on the strengths and weakness of universities. For example, there are also specialized rankings on universities such as rankings based on a specific major, employment and student satisfaction rate. As most rankings have already published their measuring criteria, people can choose which ranking to believe based on what they consider the most important factor. Thirdly, rankings at universities around the world also reveal a distribution of quality education resources around the globe. Taking a closer look at these data is crucial and helpful when the public is considering to improve global issues such as education equality and north-south gap. Armed with the three reasons above, I believe universities ranking is a blessing regardless of the uncertain criteria the rankings are conducted by. It’s advantageous to both individuals who are faced with the choice of college and the interest of the public.
解析
材料围绕“大学排名是否是好事”进行了探讨,两个选段正好是相反的观点。
选段一是反对的观点,指出这些大学排名的评估方式并不准确。首先,一所学校的教学质量并不能简单评估出来(quality cannot be measured easily);其次,这些排名大多依赖学校的声誉做判断,众所周知这是不可靠的(notoriously inaccurate)。而且这些排名多关注研究型大学而忽略其他学校,标准(criteria)也每年都不同,这些都说明排名不可靠。
选段二则是支持的观点,指出排名能够让人们迅速便捷地了解信息,而大学可以被看作是“体验式商品”,没有可靠第三方的评估(reliable third party assessment),人们很难作出选择。这些排名还能让学生根据自己的需要选择合适的大学。
开篇:概括材料,总结正反双方对大学排名的不同意见。
主体:提出自己观点——大学排名是好事,并从三方面阐述理由:
1.大学排名能让人们直观、快速的区分世界上的众多大学。
2.不同的排名有不同的参考标准,这有助于客观全面地体现大学的优缺点。
3.大学排名可以显示全球教育资源的分配情况。
结尾:总结全文,重申大学排名不仅对面临择校的个人,而且对于公众而言都是有益的。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/QBIK777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
A、Shiftingfromoneprogramtoanother.B、Workingoutwaystoreducestudentnumber.C、Emphasizingbetterqualityofeducation.
A、Notfast,notslowly.B、Withabitofchange.C、Slowlybutclearly.D、Witharoaringvoice.B在第一部分对话的最后,男士问女士,演讲速度是要快一些还是慢一些。女
三年前在南京我住的地方有一道后门,每晚我打开后门,便看见一个静寂的夜。下面是一片菜园,上面是星群密布的蓝天。星光在我们的肉眼里虽然微小,然而它使我们觉得光明无处不在。那时候我正在读一些关于天文学的书,也认得一些星星,好像它们就是我的朋友,它们常常在和我谈话
母亲是个“好劳动”。从我能记忆时起,总是天不亮就起床。全家二十口人,妇女们轮班煮饭,轮到就煮一年。母亲把饭煮了,还要种田,种菜,喂猪,养蚕,纺棉花。因为她身材高大结实,还能挑水挑粪。母亲这样地整日劳碌着。我到四五岁时就很自然地在旁边帮她的忙,到八九岁时就不
人生有三重境界,这三重境界可以用一段充满禅机的语言来说明,这段语言便是:看山是山,看水是水;看山不是山,看水不是水;看山还是山,看水还是水。这就是说一个人的人生之初纯洁无瑕,初识世界,一切都是新鲜的,眼睛看见什么就是什么,人家告诉他这是山,他就认识了山,
幸福似乎主要是一种内心快乐的状态。不过,它不是一般的快乐,而是非常强烈和深刻的快乐,以至于我们此时此刻会由衷地觉得活着是多么有意思,人生是多么美好。正是因为这样,幸福最直接的体验包含着我们对生命意义的肯定评价。感到幸福,也就是感到自己生命的意义得到了实现。
……合中国旧历的三伏,一年最热的时候。
在人际关系问题上我们不要太浪漫主义。人是很有趣的,往往在接触一个人时首先看到的都是他或她的优点。这一点颇像是在餐馆里用餐的经验。开始吃头盘或冷碟的时候,印象很好。吃头两个主菜时,也是赞不绝口。愈吃愈趋于冷静,吃完了这顿宴席,缺点就都找出来了。于是转喜为怒,
路上只我一个人,背着手踱着。这一片天地好像是我的;我也像超出了平常的自己,到了另一个世界里。我爱热闹,也爱冷静;爱群居,也爱独处。像今晚上,一个人在这苍茫的月下,什么都可以想,什么都可以不想,便觉是个自由的人。白天里一定要做的事,一定要说的话,现在都可不理
……饿了吃糠甜如蜜,饱了吃蜜也不甜。
随机试题
构成出版活动的基本要素是()。
19世纪70年代80年代,中国陷人了严重的“边疆危机”,表现在()
A.单纯扩散B.经载体易化扩散C.经通道易化扩散D.原发性主动转运E.继发性主动转运心室肌细胞动作电位4期的钠钙交换属于
有权聘任或解聘国有独资公司经理的是( )。
设计合同示范文本规定,发包人向设计人委托任务的工作范围包括( )。
既有结构的安全性评定包括()评定项目。
学生围绕一个社会问题,通过相互交流看法,共同分析测试或通过不同观点的争辩、论证,提高思想认识、提高分辨问题的能力的方法是______。
“贿选”村官背景资料:山西省河津市下化乡老窑头村是一个贫闲村,人均收入不足1000元,是下化乡9个村中最穷的一个,但正是在这个贫穷的小山村,发生了一件大事——“贿选”村官,其金额之大。与该村村民的贫困形成了鲜明的对比。2003年2月,该
在浓度为40%的酒精中加入4千克水,浓度变为30%,再加入m千克纯酒精,浓度变为50%,则m为多少千克?()
Theinternetisgoodatshame.1)Therearecountlesswebsiteswherepeoplecanpostnastycomplaintsaboutex-loversandrudec
最新回复
(
0
)