首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Every year, various organizations and magazines publish college rankings issues in their countries. These rankings often get a l
Every year, various organizations and magazines publish college rankings issues in their countries. These rankings often get a l
admin
2021-02-24
81
问题
Every year, various organizations and magazines publish college rankings issues in their countries. These rankings often get a lot of attention from the media, colleges and college-bound students and their parents. But are these rankings actually a good thing? The following excerpts are opinions from two American experts on this issue.
Write an article of NO LESS THAN 300 words, in which you should:
1. summarize both opinions, and then
2. express your opinion towards college rankings.
Excerpt 1
Philip Altbac, Research Professor in the Lynch School of Education at Boston College
College and university rankings are ubiquitous worldwide. Big decisions are made on the basis of rankings. Students and their families use them for deciding where to study, governments sometimes allocate funds on the basis of rankings and the academic community obsesses over its current score.
In today’s world of mass and competitive higher education, rankings are probably and unfortunately inevitable. But what do the rankings measure? Everything and nothing.
They claim to provide in a single score the essence of quality. But quality cannot be measured easily, and some aspects of educational performance cannot be accurately assessed at all. Research performance is most easily assessed; it is possible to count articles, grants, books and to measure the impact of work in the sciences.
Most rankings rely a lot on measures of reputation, such as asking administrators and academics what they think about various universities. These are notoriously inaccurate. No one has wide knowledge of a range of schools, particularly if asked about institutions in other countries, and subjectivity reigns supreme. Other key variables cannot be accurately gauged. Teaching quality and learning outcomes are among the most problematical—and most important.
Further, one size does not fit all in higher education. Harvard University differs immensely from Bunker Hill Community College, just a few miles away. Rankings generally measure the research universities and neglect the rest. Some of the rankings change their criteria from year to year, thus making it difficult to trace trends over time.
Excerpt 2
Paul Glastris, American journalist and political columnist
I like rankings. So do most students and parents. Rankings provide a quick and easy way for normal, busy people to visually grasp the results of assessments that are often quite complex. We rely on rankings—Zagat for restaurants, Angie’s List for contractors, Consumer Reports for just about everything else—to be our arbiters of quality and value because we don’t have the time or ability to reliably figure out all the products and services in the marketplace on our own.
This is especially true of colleges. Higher education is the biggest investment many people will ever make, and often the most fateful. College is also what economists call an "experience good"— that is, a good or service whose quality isn’t readily apparent until after you’ve consumed it It’s almost impossible to buy an experience good intelligently without some reliable third party assessment.
Though certainly not perfect, popular college rankings are a great way to sift through thousands of universities and find college options that are most in tune with an individual’s wants and needs. In the broadest sense, rankings provide a list of top colleges. This allows prospective students to identify and expand the list of potential 4-year or online schools based on quality of degree programs, majors available, career opportunities and more. For example, if a small school is your priority, you can find a list of the top ten small schools. If you’re primarily looking for a social experience, you can check out the top ten party schools.
选项
答案
College Ranking Is a Blessing The college rankings published annually by various organizations and magazines attract a lot of eyeballs. Whether such conduct is good or not? Supporters, like Mr. Glastris, take it as a beneficial information as it can help students to choose colleges that accord with their preferences conveniently, while professor Altbac attacks the rankings on their criteria which aren’t scientific enough, leading to an inaccurate evaluation of colleges. And the criteria of some rankings vary each year, making it very difficult to follow the change of rankings. Moreover, all the current rankings generally give priority to research universities and neglect others. As far as I’m concerned, college ranking is a blessing based on the following three reasons. Firstly, college rankings give people a direct and fast way of distinguishing thousands of universities around the world. As going to college is a major investment for most families, college rankings published in major media will make more data available to people who are intended to make sensible and efficient choices. Secondly, in response to the attack on the validity of the rankings, i.e. the criteria chosen, I believe that different rankings must have considered different criteria which will provide a relatively comprehensive picture on the strengths and weakness of universities. For example, there are also specialized rankings on universities such as rankings based on a specific major, employment and student satisfaction rate. As most rankings have already published their measuring criteria, people can choose which ranking to believe based on what they consider the most important factor. Thirdly, rankings at universities around the world also reveal a distribution of quality education resources around the globe. Taking a closer look at these data is crucial and helpful when the public is considering to improve global issues such as education equality and north-south gap. Armed with the three reasons above, I believe universities ranking is a blessing regardless of the uncertain criteria the rankings are conducted by. It’s advantageous to both individuals who are faced with the choice of college and the interest of the public.
解析
材料围绕“大学排名是否是好事”进行了探讨,两个选段正好是相反的观点。
选段一是反对的观点,指出这些大学排名的评估方式并不准确。首先,一所学校的教学质量并不能简单评估出来(quality cannot be measured easily);其次,这些排名大多依赖学校的声誉做判断,众所周知这是不可靠的(notoriously inaccurate)。而且这些排名多关注研究型大学而忽略其他学校,标准(criteria)也每年都不同,这些都说明排名不可靠。
选段二则是支持的观点,指出排名能够让人们迅速便捷地了解信息,而大学可以被看作是“体验式商品”,没有可靠第三方的评估(reliable third party assessment),人们很难作出选择。这些排名还能让学生根据自己的需要选择合适的大学。
开篇:概括材料,总结正反双方对大学排名的不同意见。
主体:提出自己观点——大学排名是好事,并从三方面阐述理由:
1.大学排名能让人们直观、快速的区分世界上的众多大学。
2.不同的排名有不同的参考标准,这有助于客观全面地体现大学的优缺点。
3.大学排名可以显示全球教育资源的分配情况。
结尾:总结全文,重申大学排名不仅对面临择校的个人,而且对于公众而言都是有益的。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/QBIK777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
A、He’vegottalent.B、Hecanshowmanyskills.C、Hehasanordinaryface.D、HeattendstheFameschool.A在对话中,Alexis说在他9岁时,有一些表演
Thethirdisproximity,postureandechoing.Proximityreferstothe【T1】______betweenspeakers.Thiscanindicateanumberoft
Thethirdisproximity,postureandechoing.Proximityreferstothe【T1】______betweenspeakers.Thiscanindicateanumberoft
A、Becausetheyarereadby110,000studentsthisyear.B、Becausetheyaredesignedforstudentsin361colleges.C、Becausethey
PASSAGETWOWhatdoesthequotationofRichardSchickelmeaninPara.6?
中国是文明古国,礼仪之邦,很重礼节。凡来了客人,沏茶、敬茶的礼仪是必不可少的。当有客来访,可征求意见,选用最合来客口味的茶叶和最佳茶具待客。主人在陪伴客人饮茶时,要注意客人杯、壶中的茶水残留量,一般用茶杯泡茶,如已喝去一半,就要添加开水,随喝随添,使茶水浓
你得承认,多媒体不只是一件东西,而是包括许多东西的复杂的组合:硬件、软件和这两者相遇时的界面。不,我们还忘了一件很重要的事情,多媒体还包括你。是的,就是!对于多媒体,你不再是一个被动的观众,你可以控制,可以交互作用,可以让它按你的需要去做。这就意味着你可以
得病以前,我受父母宠爱,在家中横行霸道。一旦隔离,拘禁在花园山坡上一幢小房子里,我顿感打入冷宫,十分郁郁不得志起来。一个春天的傍晚,园中百花怒放,父母在园中设宴,一时宾客云集,笑语四溢。我在山坡的小屋里,悄悄掀起窗帘,窥见园中大千世界一片繁华,自己的哥姐、
桂林环境优雅,物产丰富。
手机刷新了人与人的关系。
随机试题
化疗时消化道不良反应的护理,正确的是
患者,男性,73岁。原有高血压病史,无明显诱因下近来感觉劳累性呼吸费力,加重1天。查体:一般状况可,体温正常,血压170/100mmHg,静息下呼吸30次/分,心率110次/分,双肺呼吸音清,下肺可闻及少许湿啰音,二尖瓣听诊区可闻及4级收缩期杂音,可及震颤
根据马斯洛的需要层次理论,人的最高需要是
下列关于执行异议的叙述中,正确的是()。
[背景]某化工项目的建设单位甲分别与施工单位乙、材料供应单位丙和设备供应单位丁签订了施工总包合同、材料和设备采购合同,又委托监理单位A对该工程进行施工阶段监理。在与建设单位甲签订了委托监理合同后,监理单位A任命李某为该项目总监理工程师。李某上任后,首先组
我国文物级别划分的依据是()。
社会工作的专业理念相信每个人都有生存的权利,每个人都是有潜能的并可以且应该得到发展的,因各种缺陷而导致残疾的个体理应也可以得到发展。()
下列词类从大类到小类的归类,不正确的是()。
Whatisthewoman’smainproblem?
【B1】【B3】
最新回复
(
0
)