首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Character Analysis of Shakespearean Plays I. Character analysis —character evaluation as the best way to start the analysis of
Character Analysis of Shakespearean Plays I. Character analysis —character evaluation as the best way to start the analysis of
admin
2015-07-27
38
问题
Character Analysis of Shakespearean Plays
I. Character analysis
—character evaluation as the best way to start the analysis
of a Shakespearean play —characters in a typical 【B1】______ doing particular things in 【B1】______
every play
—conflicts involved characters
—characters being on trial
II. Three main reasons for approaching Shakespearean plays
by analyzing characters
A. Plays with active characters like people around us
—the appeal of the genre
—seeing the play as 【B2】______ itself 【B2】______
B. Shakespeare’s ability to 【B3】______ characters 【B3】______
—individual personality with experience requiring an
evaluation
—individual actors’ need to 【B4】______ upon the motivations 【B4】______
for their characters
C. The play including 【B5】______ itself, for the reason that 【B5】______
characters are trying to understand their own characters
III. The merits and weaknesses of the approach illustrated
by 【B6】______ interpretations of 19th century 【B6】______
A. Values
—always reminding of the central concern — 【B7】______ 【B7】______
—keeping in touch with the reason why Shakespeare 【B8】______ 【B8】______
B. Problems
—not enough 【B9】______ about characters: 【B9】______
1) key elements full character analysis needs are 【B10】______ 【B10】______
2) for the lack of evidence, the analysis often ends with
trivial matters.
【B6】
Character Analysis of Shakespearean Plays
Good morning, everyone. Last time I just gave a brief introduction to the Shakespearean play, today we will go further to discuss together how to understand a Shakespearean play. The most obvious way to begin an interpretation of a Shakespearean play is by evaluating the characters. [1] Any play involves characters in a particular setting, doing particular things. The plot will develop a conflict, which will usually inflict pain or distress on some people, and will lead to a final resolution of sorts in which some characters may die or be punished severely, while others survive or triumph or get substantially rewarded. Hence, one clear entry into such a work is to put the characters on trial: Who is good? Who is bad? Why do certain people act in certain ways? Do any of the characters change? Where are my sympathies as I make my way through this play? As an interpreter, I am, in essence, the judge, and how shall I apportion my verdicts?
Interpreting a play by analyzing the characters in it, judging them, and coming to some final evaluation of them is a natural way to approach Shakespeare for three main reasons. The first is that these are plays, and they inevitably feature active characters more or less recognizably like people around us. That, indeed, is the chief appeal of the genre. [2] So it is entirely natural to treat the play as we treat life itself, by responding to the people we see, the actions they carry out, the words they use, and the decisions they make. On the basis of these observations we will come to some conclusions about the characters and will discuss the play in those terms.
[3] The second reason is that Shakespeare is famous, more than anyone else, for his astonishing ability to create interesting, complex, and natural characters. Unlike many other dramatists whose characters do not invite very complex investigation, Shakespeare has the ability to fill a play with scores of characters, each of whom talks in a language and acts in a way which indicates a sharply focused individual personality with a very particular response to experience. Hence, it is, once again, natural to treat them as fully realized people whose conduct requires an evaluative judgment.
Then, too, the fact that we are dealing with plays always keeps the approach through character analysis alive,[4] because theatre productions depend upon individual actors, and individual actors need to reflect upon the motivations for their characters. They have to, in a sense, discover their human qualities and become the stage people whose lives they enact. Thus, the dramatic tradition of continuing to mount Shakespeare productions ensures that the analysis of character will remain a powerful force in the interpretation of the plays.
The third major reason why character analysis is an important approach to Shakespeare’s plays is (as Harold Bloom has repeatedly pointed out) that Shakespeare’s characters are often intrigued or puzzled by their own characters. That is, they make their characters part of the dramatic "problem" of the fiction we are exploring. When, for example, Hamlet or Macbeth or Othello starts to wrestle with his own character, trying to understand his own motivation, feelings, and actions, that moment places the nature of the character as an essential element in the work (in a way that is markedly different from texts in which a character’s personality does not create particular problems for him). [5] In other words, the plays themselves put character analysis directly on the table.
The approach to a Shakespeare play which places the analysis of character at the centre of the process was particularly strong in the nineteenth century, [6] and the literary interpretations from that period often illustrate the strengths and weaknesses of that approach. [7] The great value of character analysis is that it always reminds us that, whatever else we may want to talk of, the central concern is particular human beings. Whatever else King Lear is about, it is centrally about a suffering old man, whose unique character brings upon him almost unimaginable suffering. Whatever we make of Hamlet, we cannot forget that the people in the play drive Ophelia insane and lead her to suicide, and that she is an innocent and loving young woman. [8] Focusing upon the characters in the play always keeps us in touch with a major reason why Shakespeare matters — his works constantly illuminate human nature in all sorts of moving ways.
That said, however, treating the interpretation of a play as primarily a matter of evaluating character can create problems. [9] One major problem, of course, is that in many instances we do not know enough about a character to arrive at a sufficiently full understanding of his or her personality. We know almost nothing of Hamlet’s childhood, or Bolingbroke’s inner thoughts, or Lady Macbeth’s sexuality. [10] Thus, key elements required in any lull character analysis are missing. Of course, we can speculate on such matters, but such speculations can often end up in inconclusive and often trivial debates, because there is not enough evidence. So we can find criticism by the analysis of character degenerating into explorations of the girlhood of Shakespeare’s heroines, endless arguments about whether or not the Macbeths had any children, how old Hamlet might be or whether he is really insane or not, whether Falstaff is a coward or not, how black Othello really is, or what Antony and Cleopatra really talk about when they are alone together. Shakespearean plays are great inheritance as well as wealth for the humankind. The characters in his plays give us lots of insights to know and to talk with Shakespeare’s soul. I hope my lecture has led you on the way to the thought of this great player. Thank you for listening.
选项
答案
literary
解析
在讲完人物分析的三个原因后,演讲者提到,19世纪对莎士比亚戏剧进行的分析主要是“人物分析”,那个阶段的文学分析(literary interpretations)经常会体现thestrengths and weaknesses of that approach,即性格分析的优点和不足。本题所在处考查“文学分析”,即literary interpretations。注意题干将讲座中的内容转换成了被动语态。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/QMOO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Accordingtolegend,theancientOlympicGameswerefoundedbyHeracles,asonofZeus.YetthefirstOlympicGamesforwhich
Therearetwomethodsoffighting,theonebylaw,theotherbyforce;thefirstmethodisthatofmen,thesecondofbeasts;an
Ineducation,Nigeriahasamothertonguepolicywhichrequiresthateverychildistaughtinamothertongueatthepreprimary【
TheUnitedStatesdidn’tparticipateinWorldWarIIuntil
Everyculturehasacceptedstandardswhenitcomestopersonalhygiene.ForeignvisitorsshouldthereforebeawareofwhatAmer
Theprocessbywhichawordisshortenedwithoutchangingitsmeaningandpartofspeechiscalled
Thestudyoflanguagemeaningisknownas
1 Manypeopleseemtothinkthatsciencefictionistypifiedbythecoversofsomeoftheoldpulpmagazines;theBug-eyedMons
城市是一粒粒精致的银扣,缀在旷野的黑绿色大氅上,不分昼夜地熠熠闪光。我所说的旷野,泛指崇山峻岭,河流海洋,湖泊森林,戈壁荒漠……一切人烟罕至保存原始风貌的地方。旷野和城市,从根本上讲,是对立的。人们多以为和城市相对应的那个词,
离我们不远站着的一位中年绅士也在眺望远景,他也是中国人,听我儿子讲得挺带劲,就非常自然地与儿子攀谈起来,饶有兴致地论及阿拉斯加在美国版图上所处位置的特殊性,因为该州与美国本土根本不搭界,它一边与俄罗斯的白令海峡相互对望,一边与加拿大毗邻,那地方原属沙俄领土
随机试题
寡人之於國也,盡心焉耳矣。耳矣:
治疗肺胃出血,宜首选
未婚女,28岁,闭经2年。肛诊:子宫正常大小,孕激素试验阴性,下一步最佳检查方法是
A、卡介苗B、脊髓灰质炎减毒活疫苗C、麻疹减毒活疫苗D、乙肝疫苗E、百、白、破类毒素肌内注射的疫苗是()
关于慢性胃炎的叙述,正确的是()。
某城市郊野公园修建一条园路,存混凝土面层施工完成后,应即时开始养护,养护期应为()天以上,冬期施工后的养护期还应更长些。
课外、校外教育与课内教育没有共同之处。()
1994年1月20日,湖北农民佘祥林的妻子张在玉失踪。1994年4月11日,附近一水塘发现一女尸被认定为张在玉。公安机关通过刑讯逼供认定佘祥林杀害了张在玉,在证据不足的情况下,1998年6月15日,法院以故意杀人罪判处佘祥林有期徒刑15年。佘祥林上诉后二审
如果X是一个正的实数,保留两位小数、将千分位四舍五入的表达式是( )。
Thepursuitforsuccessalwaysbeginswithatarget.Buttoomanypeople【C1】______throughlifelikesleepwalkers.Eachdaythey
最新回复
(
0
)