首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
On May 24, 1976, the British wine merchant Steven Spurrier organized a blind tasting of French and Californian wines. Spurrier w
On May 24, 1976, the British wine merchant Steven Spurrier organized a blind tasting of French and Californian wines. Spurrier w
admin
2011-08-28
72
问题
On May 24, 1976, the British wine merchant Steven Spurrier organized a blind tasting of French and Californian wines. Spurrier was a Francophile and, like most wine experts, didn’t expect the New World upstarts to compete with the premiers crus from Bordeaux. He assembled a panel of eleven wine experts and had them taste a variety of Cabernets blind, rating each bottle on a twenty-point scale.The results shocked the wine world. According to the judges, the best Cabernet at the tasting was a 1973 bottle from Stag’s Leap Wine Cellars in Napa Valley. When the tasting was repeated a few years later—some judges insisted that the French wines had been drunk too young—Stag’s Leap was once again declared the winner, followed by three other California Cabernets. These blind tastings helped to legitimate Napa vineyards.
But now, in an even more surprising turn of events, another American wine region has performed far better than expected in a blind tasting against the finest French chateaus. Ready for the punch line? The wines were from New Jersey.
The tasting was closely modelled on the 1976 event, featuring the same fancy Bordeaux vineyards, such as Chateau Mouton Rothschild and Chateau Haut-Brion. The Jersey entries included bottles from the Heritage Vineyards in Mullica Hill and Unionville Vineyards in Ringoes. The nine judges were French and American wine experts.
The Judgment of Princeton didn’t quite end with a Jersey victory—a French wine was on top in both the red and white categories—but, in terms of the reassurance for those with valuable wine collections, it might as well have. Clos des Mouches only narrowly beat out Unionville Single Vineyard and two other Jersey whites, while Chateau Mouton Rothschild and Haut-Brion topped Heritage’s BDX. The wines from New Jersey cost, on average, about five percent as much as their French counterparts. And then there’s the inconsistency of the judges: the scores for that Mouton Rothschild, for instance, ranged from 11 to 19.5. On the excellent blog Marginal Revolution, the economist Tyler Cowen highlights the analysis of the Princeton professor Richard Quand, who found that almost of all the wines were "statistically undistinguishable" from each other. This suggests that, if the blind tasting were held again, a Jersey wine might very well win.
What can we learn from these tests? First, that tasting wine is really hard, even for experts. Because the sensory differences between different bottles of rotten grape juice are so slight—and the differences get even more muddled after a few sips—there is often wide disagreement about which wines are best. For instance, both the winning red and white wines in the Princeton tasting were ranked by at least one of the judges as the worst.
The perceptual ambiguity of wine helps explain why contextual influences—say, the look of a label, or the price tag on the bottle—can profoundly influence expert judgment. This was nicely demonstrated in a mischievous 2001 experiment led by Frederic Brochet at the University of Bordeaux. In the first test, Brochet invited fifty-seven wine experts and asked them to give their impressions of what looked like two glasses of red and white wine. The wines were actually the same white wine, one of which had been tinted red with food coloring. But that didn’t stop the experts from describing the "red" wine in language typically used to describe red wines. One expert praised its "jamminess," while another enjoyed its "crushed red fruit."
The second test Brochet conducted was even more damning. He took a middling Bordeaux and served it in two different bottles. One bottle bore the label of a fancy grand cru, the other of an ordinary vin de table. Although they were being served the exact same wine, the experts gave the bottles nearly opposite descriptions. The grand cru was summarized as being "agreeable," "woody," "complex," "balanced," and "rounded," while the most popular adjectives for the vin de table included "weak," "short," "light," " flat," and "faulty."
The results are even more distressing for non-experts. In recent decades, the wine world has become an increasingly quantitative place, as dependent on scores and statistics as Billy Beane. But these ratings suggest a false sense of precision, as if it were possible to reliably identify the difference between an eighty-nine-point Merlot from Jersey and a ninety-one-point blend from Bordeaux—or even a greater spread. And so we linger amid the wine racks, paralyzed by the alcoholic arithmetic. How much are we willing to pay for a few extra points?
These calculations are almost certainly a waste of time. Last year, the psychologist Richard Wiseman bought a wide variety of bottles at the local supermarket, from a five-dollar Bordeaux to a fifty-dollar champagne, and asked people to say which wine was more expensive. (All of the taste tests were conducted double-blind, with neither the experimenter nor subject aware of the actual price.) According to Wiseman’s data, the five hundred and seventy-eight participants could only pick the more expensive wine fifty-three percent of the time, which is basically random chance. They actually performed below chance when it came to picking red wines. Bordeaux fared the worst, with a significant majority—sixty-one percent—picking the cheap plonk as the more expensive selection.
From The New Yorker, June 13, 2012
Which one of the following best explains the intention of the author?
选项
A、It’s impossible for the non-expert to perform well in wine tasting.
B、Wine tasting is a very complicated and meticulous job.
C、There’s a lot of uncertainties in blind tasting.
D、Because of the hardness of wine tasting, labels and price tags turn out to be trustworthy.
答案
B
解析
本题为主旨题。虽然在文章倒数第二段有The results are even more distressing for non—expels.证明选项A是有提到的。但是通篇也讲到了专家们品酒也一样地难以确定。作者主要还是想要表达品酒的困难性和不确定性。但是又不局限于肓品(blind tasting),因此选项B正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/QeYO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
EconomicconditionshaveimprovedduringthepastdecadeinmanyNorthAmericanandEuropeanCBDs,primarilybecauseofanunp
EconomicconditionshaveimprovedduringthepastdecadeinmanyNorthAmericanandEuropeanCBDs,primarilybecauseofanunp
Whichofthefollowingexpressionsmanifestthedirectivefunctionoflanguage?
InthedaysbeforeDianabecameaccustomedtodailyhairdressers,highfashionandexpertlyappliedmakeup,shelookedherbest
FashionWiththeprogressionofthehumansociety,peopleareincreasinglydemandingtheirclothestobebeautifulaswellas
FashionWiththeprogressionofthehumansociety,peopleareincreasinglydemandingtheirclothestobebeautifulaswellas
FashionWiththeprogressionofthehumansociety,peopleareincreasinglydemandingtheirclothestobebeautifulaswellas
SpeechacttheorywasoriginatedwiththeBritishphilosopher______inthelate1950s.
Sometimesitwasaslongasayear;sometimesasshortastwenty-fourhours.Butalwayswewereinterestedindiscoveringjusth
ReligioninAmericanLifeDiversityisthechieffeatureofreligionintheUnitedStates.AlthoughChristianityhasalways
随机试题
A.造血干细胞增生和分化异常B.遗传性Hb合成异常C.慢性失血D.获得性红细胞膜缺陷E.遗传性红细胞膜缺陷遗传性球形红细胞增多症的发病机制为
可以结合企业特点,形成具有本企业特色的产品系列,使产品在市场上占据有利地位的新产品开发方式是()。
某县公安局警察周航、朱元经过预谋于2001年3月初,找到经常在所辖地区卖淫的妇女吴华,3人合谋,由吴华勾引嫖客,周航、朱元抓嫖客“罚款”,得款均分。尔后,周航、朱元于4月中旬为吴华租赁了两间门面房。此后吴华即往自己住处勾引嫖客,由周航的侄子赵恩(在逃)向
公司制期货交易所的权力机构是()。
在零部件是自制还是外购决策时,如果企业有剩余生产能力,则需要考虑的成本有()。
按照我国《合伙企业法》的规定,下列人员中,不能成为合伙企业合伙人的有( )。
商务服务业中法人单位数最多的是()。
贷款是商业银行的主要业务活动之一。我国法律规定,商业银行贷款应当符合有关资产负债比例的要求。其中商业银行的资本充足率不得低于()。
告子认为人性就像柳树,仁义就像器具,柳树被外力做成器具,而不是柳树生来的样子。孟子则反驳说,柳树被作为器具是外力暴力的破坏了树本身,事实上让人变得仁义不必像是靠外力来扭去柳树那样扭曲人性。孟子得出结论,告子的类比是错误的。孟子的结论得以成立的前提条件是(
A、Awriter.B、Alawyer.C、Areporter.D、Ateacher.C
最新回复
(
0
)