首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Meteorologists routinely tell us what next week’s weather is likely to he, and climate scientists discuss what might happen in 1
Meteorologists routinely tell us what next week’s weather is likely to he, and climate scientists discuss what might happen in 1
admin
2011-02-11
43
问题
Meteorologists routinely tell us what next week’s weather is likely to he, and climate scientists discuss what might happen in 100 years. Christoph Schar, though, ventures dangerously close to that middle realm, where previously only the Farmer’s Almanac dared go: what will next summer’s weather be like? Following last year’s tragic heat wave, which directly caused the death of tens of thousands of people, the question is of burning interest to Europeans. Schar asserts that last summer’s sweltering temperatures should no longer be thought of as extraordinary. "The situation in 2002 and 2003 in Europe, where we had a summer with extreme rainfall and record flooding followed by the hottest summer in hundreds of years, is going to be typical for future weather patterns," he says.
Most Europeans have probably never read Schar’s report (not least because it was published in the scientific journal Nature in the dead of winter) but they seem to be bracing themselves for the worst. As part of its new national "heat-wave plan", France issued a level-three alert when temperatures in Provence reached 34 degrees Celsius three days in a row; hospital and rescue workers were asked to prepare for an influx of patients. Italian government officials have proposed creating a national registry of people over 65 so they can be herded into air-conditioned supermarkets in the event of another heat wave. London’s mayor has offered a 100,000 pound reward for anybody who can come up with a practical way of cooling the city’s underground trains, where temperatures have lately reached nearly 40 degrees Celsius. (The money hasn’t been claimed.) Global warming seems to have permanently entered the European psyche.
If the public is more aware, though, experts are more confused. When the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change hammered out its last assessment in 2001, scientists pulled together the latest research and made their best estimate of how much the Earth’s atmosphere would warm during the next century. There was a lot they didn’t know, but they were confident they’d be able to plug the gaps in time for the next report, due out in 2007. When they explored the fundamental physics and chemistry of the atmosphere, though, they found something unexpected: the way the atmosphere—and, in particular, clouds—respond to increasing levels of carbon is far more complex and difficult to predict than they had expected. "We thought we’d reduce the uncertainty, but that hasn’t happened," says Kevin Trenberth, a climate scientist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research and a lead author of the next IPCC report. "As we delve further and further into the science and gain a better understanding of the true complexity of the atmosphere, the uncertainties have gotten deeper."
This doesn’t mean, of course, that the world isn’t warming. Only the biased or the deluded deny that temperatures have risen, and that human activity has something to do with it. The big question that scientists have struggled with is how much warming will occur over the next century? With so much still unknown in the climate equation, there’s no way of telling whether warnings of catastrophe are overblown or if things are even more dire than we thought.
Why do scientists like Schar make predictions? Because, like economists, it’s their job to hazard a best guess with the resources at hand-namely, vast computer programs that simulate what the Earth’s atmosphere will do in certain circumstances. These models incorporate all the latest research into how the Earth’s atmosphere behaves. But there are problems with the computer models. The atmosphere is very big, but also consists of a multitude of tiny interactions among particles of dust, soot, cloud droplets and trace gases that cannot be safely ignored. Current models don’t have nearly the resolution they need to capture what goes on at such small scales.
Scientists got an inkling that something was missing from the models in the early 1990s when they ran a peculiar experiment. They had the leading models simulate warming over the next century and got a similar answer from each. Then they ran the models again-this time accounting for what was then known about cloud physics.
As to global warming in the next century, climate scientists’ answer is
选项
A、ambivalent.
B、inexplicit.
C、negative.
D、affirmative.
答案
B
解析
推断题。根据题目顺序定位至第四段。末句指出:there’s no way of telling whether warning of catastrophe are overblown or if things are even more dire than we thought.结合第三段首句的“If the public is more aware,though,experts are more confused.”可以推断科学家们对于下个世纪的气候变暖情况没有给出确定答案,故B为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/QmYO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
WhichofthefollowingbearstheleastassociationwithIT?
SteveandYaserfirstmetintheirchemistryclassofanAmericanuniversity.YaserwasaninternationalstudentfromJordan.He
TessoftheD’urbervilleswaswrittenby______.
ExpositionExpositioniswritingthatexplains.Mostofthebooksinuniversityli-brariesareexamplesofexposition.Alth
Neartheendofafive-daytourofhighlyautomated,high-techJapanesefactories,theAmericanvisitorwasoverwhelmedandfeel
SuchjoyItwasthespringof1985,andPresidentReaganhadjustgivenMotherTeresatheMedalofFreedominaRoseGardencere
Whichofthefollowingcountrieshastilemostimmigrants?
A、BecauseIndiaandChinafoughtthereB、BecauseitbecomesdependentontheimportC、BecausetheIndiangovernmentregardedthi
A美国历史。考查罗斯福总统的“新政”的目的。1929~1933年,美国遭遇了经济大萧条(TheGreatExpression),1932年罗斯福当选总统后实施“新政”,目的就是为了拯救美国的经济。
FRANKFURT—IbumpeddowninFrankfurtat10:55AM.AGermanlanding,Ithought—unsubtleandpunctual.Theskywasclear,anu
随机试题
实验期内动物平均每摄入1克蛋白质所增加的体重克数是生物价。()
土基干湿类型划分的指标是路基土的相对含水量。( )
不动产是指不可移动的有形财产,如土地及房屋、林木等地上附着物。()
种植业是利用植物的生活机能,通过人工培育以取得()的社会生产部门。
近日,火星车在加勒陨坑拍摄的图像发现,火星陨坑内的远古土壤存在着类似地球土壤裂纹剖面的土壤样本,通常这样的土壤存在于南极干燥谷和智利阿塔卡马沙漠,这暗示着远古时期火星可能存在生命。以下哪项如果为真,最能支持上述结论?()
智者
可以作为窗体记录源的是()。
ThePragueSchoolisbestknownforitscontributiontothedistinctionbetweenphoneticsand
过分多疑的心理,因素很是复杂,决非单纯神经过敏可以解释。(beexplainedby)
A、Thestewardess.B、Myfriend.C、Apassenger.D、Thepilot.A[听力原文]Whogavetheauthorapaperbag?信息明示题。文章提到,whenIfeltairsi
最新回复
(
0
)