首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting
admin
2011-05-29
109
问题
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting the innocent? It is often said that the British trial system is more like a game than a serious attempt to do justice. The lawyers on each side are so engrossed in playing hard to win, challenging each other and the judge on technical points, that the object of finding out the truth is almost forgotten. All the effort is concentrated on the big day, on the dramatic cross-examination of the key witnesses in front of the jury. Critics like to compare our "adversarial" system (resembling two adversaries engaged in a contest) with the Continental "inquisitorial" system, under which the judge plays a more important inquiring role.
In early times, in the Middle Ages, the systems of trial across Europe were similar. At that time trial by "ordeal"— essentially a religious event—was the main way of testing guilt or innocence. When this was eventually abandoned, the two systems parted company. On the Continent, church-trained legal officials took over the function of both prosecuting and judging, while in England these were largely left to lay people, the Justice of the Peace and the jury. The jurymen were often illiterate and this meant that all the evidence had to be put to them orally. This historical accident dominates procedure even today, with all evidence being given in open court by word of mouth on the crucial day.
On the other hand, in France for instance, all the evidence is written before the trial under supervision by an investigating judge. This exhaustive pretrial looks very undramatic; much of it is just a public checking of the written records already gathered.
The Americans adopted the British system lock, stock and barrel and enshrined it in their Constitution. But, while the basic features of our systems are common, there are now significant differences in the way serious cases are handled. First, because the U. S. A. has virtually no contempt of court laws to prevent pretrial publicity in the newspaper and on television, American lawyers are allowed to question jurors about knowledge and beliefs.
In Britain this is virtually never allowed, and a random selection of jurors who are presumed not to be prejudiced are empanelled. Secondly, there is no separate profession of barrister in the United States, and both prosecution and defense lawyers who are to present cases in court prepare them themselves. They go out and visit the scene, track down and interview witnesses, and familiarize themselves personally with the background. In Britain it is the solicitor who prepares the case; the barrister who appears in court is not even allowed lo meet witness beforehand. British barristers also alternate doing both prosecution and defense work. By being kept distant from the preparation and regularly appearing for both sides, barristers are said to avoid becoming too personally involved, and can approach cases more dispassionately. American lawyers, however, often know their cases better.
Reformers rightly want to learn from other countries’ mistakes and successes. But what is clear is that justice systems, largely because they are the result of long historical growth, are peculiarly difficult to adapt piecemeal.
Which of the following sentences is NOT tree?
选项
A、Oral evidence is unnecessary in France because the judges and prosecutors read the records.
B、When trial by ordeal was finally abandoned throughout Europe, trial by jury was introduced in Britain.
C、In the adversarial system, it is the lawyers who play the leading roles.
D、Lawyers in Britain are prepared to lie in order to win their cases.
答案
D
解析
这道细节题所涉及的相关信息在文章的前三段。根据第三段可以判断A选项是与原文相符的;根据第二段的第三句话,可以判断B选项与原文相符;根据第一段可以判断C选项与原文相符;只有D选项在文中找不到相关的意思,所以D选项是不对的。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/RC6O777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Readthenewreportbelow.ChoosethecorrectwordtofilleachgapfromA,BorC.Foreachquestion(29-40),markoneletter(A,
Readthearticlebelowaboutcomputerindustry.Foreachquestion(23-28)ontheoppositepage,choosethecorrectanswer.Markon
Lookatthechartbelow.Itshowstheproduction,salesandrejectionofproductsineightcompanies(A-H)ofagivenmonth.Whi
Lookatthechartbelow.Itshowstheincome,totalexpenditureandadvertisingcostsofacompanyineightweeks.Whichweekdo
Whatdoconsumersreallywant?That’saquestionmarketresearcherswouldlovetoanswer.Butsincepeopledon’talwayssaywhat
Recognizingtheshortageoftimeavailabletospendwiththeirchildren,working,motherssometimestake______intheconcepto
Herowninterestsasamother(broughtinto)playbyher(concernover)theeducationandwelfareofherchildren,thecity(in
【81】AttwominutestonooninSeptember1of1923,thegreatclockinTokyostopped.【82】TokyoBayshookasifhugerughadbeen
AproposedRussianbanonEuropeanUnionmeatexportscouldjeopardizeRussia’saspirationstojointheWorldTradeOrganization
TheAleuts(阿留申人)werenamedsobyRussians,buttheycallthemselvesUnanganwhichmeans"thepeople."Theyarenativeinhabit
随机试题
A山梨醇B聚山梨酯C酒石酸盐D硅藻土E枸橼酸盐制备混悬剂时常用的润湿剂是
下列关于回盲括约肌的功能的叙述,正确的是()。
货物综合评分法中评标委员会成员应当独立对每个初步评审合格的投标文件的评标因素在规定分值内评价打分,然后按照相应比重或权值计算每个投标人每项评分因素得分及专家汇总平均值。其中货物项目价格评分值占总分值的权值为()。
煤炭工业为什么要实行安全监察?
政府机构改革的关键是精简机构。()
Whatevertheirchosenmethod,Americansbathezealously.Astudyconductedfoundthatwetakeanaverageof4.5bathsand7.5
有学者认为,人权是宪法的出发点和归宿,宪法说到底是人权的保障法。试从宪法的特征和价值角度分析这一观点的合理性。
当数据的物理结构(存储结构、存取方式等)改变时,不影响数据库的逻辑结构,从而不致引起应用程序的变化,这是指数据的【】。
广域网中采用的交换技术大多是()。
TheCourageofNeverGivingUp:Forthispart,youareallowed30minutestowriteashortessayentitledTheCourageofNeverG
最新回复
(
0
)