首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Imagine a world where your doctor could help you avoid sickness, using knowledge of your genes as well as how you live your life
Imagine a world where your doctor could help you avoid sickness, using knowledge of your genes as well as how you live your life
admin
2014-09-05
80
问题
Imagine a world where your doctor could help you avoid sickness, using knowledge of your genes as well as how you live your life. Or where he would prescribe drugs he knew would work and not have debilitating side-effects.
Such a future is arriving faster than most realise: genetic tests are already widely used to identify patients who will be helped or harmed by certain drugs. And three years ago, in the face of a torrent of new scientific data, a number of new companies set themselves up to interpret this information for customers. Through shop fronts on the internet, anyone could order a testing kit, spit into a tube and send off their DNA—with results downloaded privately at home. Already customers can find out their response to many common medications, such as antivirals and blood-thinning agents. They can also explore their genetic likelihood of developing deep-vein thrombosis, skin cancer or glaucoma.
The industry has been subject to conflicting criticisms. On the one hand, it stands accused of offering information too dangerous to trust to consumers; on the other it is charged with peddling irrelevant, misleading nonsense. For some rare disorders, such as Huntington’s and Tay-Sachs, genetic information is a diagnosis. But most diseases are more complicated and involve several genes, or an environmental component, or both. Someone’s chance of getting skin cancer, for example, will depend on whether he worships the sun as well as on his genes.
America’s Government Accountability Office(GAO)report also revealed what the industry has openly admitted for years: that results of disease-prediction tests from different companies sometimes conflict with one another, because there is no industry-wide agreement on standard lifetime risks.
Governments hate this sort of anarchy and America’s, in particular, is considering regulation. But three things argue against wholesale regulation. First, the level of interference needs to be based on the level of risk a test represents. The government does not need to be involved if someone decides to trace his ancestry or discover what type of earwax he has. Second,the laws on fraud should be sufficient to deal with the snake-oil salesmen who promise to predict,say,whether a child might be a sporting champion. And third, science is changing very fast. Fairly soon, a customer’s whole genome will be sequenced, not merely the parts thought to be medically relevant that the testing companies now concentrate on, and he will then be able to crank the results through open-source interpretation software downloadable from anywhere on the planet. That will create problems, but the only way to stop that happening would be to make it illegal for someone to have his genome sequenced—and nobody is seriously suggesting that illiberal restriction.
Instead, then, of reacting in a hostile fashion to the trend for people to take genetic tests, governments should be asking themselves how they can make best use of this new source of information. Restricting access to tests that inform people about bad reactions to drugs could do harm. The real question is not who controls access, but how to minimise the risks and maximise the rewards of a useful revolution.
It can be inferred from Paragraph 2 to Paragraph 4 that______.
选项
A、Huntington’s and Tay-Sach can be diagnosed by genetic information because they are rare disorders
B、someone who has a lower-than-average genetic risk of skin disease can suffer a terminal skin cancer
C、genetic test companies have tried to justify the uniqueness of their disease-prediction results
D、customers have to order genetic test online because it is illegal in real life
答案
B
解析
这是一道综合性推理引申题,考查范围较广,因此难度较大。根据[A]中的线索词可锁定第三段第三句话和第四句话。这一句话提到对于某些罕见疾病,例如Huntington和Tay—Sachs,基因测试的结果本身就是一种诊断,但对于大多数疾病来说,复杂的环境因素也可能成为患病的原因,因此基因测试的结果并不足以成为诊断结果。对比之下,可推理得出基因测试结果之所以能直接诊断Huntington和Tay—Sachs,并不是因为两种疾病是罕见疾病,而是因为它们是单纯受遗传因素影响的疾病。[A]错误。由第三段第四句话同样可以得知一个人罹患皮肤癌的原因是多方面的,有可能是遗传因素影响,也有可能是后天因素影响,因此[B]正确。[C]考查的是对于原文第四段的理解,第四段中提到美国政府问责局最近揭露了一个基因测试行业内早就公开的秘密,那就是各个公司之间的预测结果往往是互相冲突的,因为缺乏统一的行业标准。由此可见这些公司并没有竭力证明自己预测结果的权威性,[C]错误。[D]考查的细节在文中的第二段,第二段中间部分提到了现在顾客很方便地在网上订购自己的基因检测报告,但是并没有提到为什么会在网上操作,[D]属无中生有。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/RJK4777K
0
考研英语一
相关试题推荐
Yourfriend,WangYing,isapplyingforajobtoteachChineseasaforeignlanguagetoAmericannationals,Hehasaskedyouto
ThestudiescitedbytheNationalEatingDisordersAssociationisbasedon______.WhichofthefollowingmayNOTbethereason
Thequestionofwhetherwarisinevitableisonewhichhasconcernedmanyoftheworld’sgreatwriters.Beforeconsideringthis
Beforethe20thcenturythehorseprovideddaytodaytransportationintheUnitedStates.Trainswereusedonlyforlong-distan
Beforethe20thcenturythehorseprovideddaytodaytransportationintheUnitedStates.Trainswereusedonlyforlong-distan
Traditionally,thewomanhasheldalowpositioninmarriagepartnerships.Whileherhusbandwenthisway,shehadtowash,stit
Alzheimer’sdiseaseisaproblemofoldage.InAmerica,thereisabouta50%chancethatanindividualwillhavedevelopeditb
Ithasbeenjustlysaidthatwhile"wespeakwithourvocalorganswe【B1】______withourwholebodies."Allofuscommunicatew
Ithasbeenjustlysaidthatwhile"wespeakwithourvocalorganswe【B1】______withourwholebodies."Allofuscommunicatew
Ithasbeenjustlysaidthatwhile"wespeakwithourvocalorganswe【B1】______withourwholebodies."Allofuscommunicatew
随机试题
陶渊明《五柳先生传》中的五柳先生具有哪些特点?这些特点有何意义?
A、β-肾上腺素受体激动素B、M胆碱受体拮抗药C、影响白三烯的药物D、肾上腺皮质激素类药物E、磷酸二酯酶抑制剂齐留通()。
证券公司的风险控制指标不符合规定,国务院证券监督管理机构责令其改正,证券公司逾期不改正的,国务院证券监督管理机构有权采取下列哪些措施?()
甲到本村乙家买柴油时,因屋内光线昏暗,甲欲点燃打火机看油量。乙担心引起火灾,上前阻止。但甲坚持说柴油见火不会燃烧,仍然点燃了打火机,结果引起油桶燃烧,造成火灾,导致甲、乙及一旁观看的丙被火烧伤,乙、丙经抢救无效死亡。后经检测,乙储存的柴油闪点不符合标准。甲
根据《商业银行监管评级内部指引(试行)》,商业银行的盈利状况评价体系中,定性指标包括()。
已知风险组合的期望报酬率和标准差分别为15%和20%,无风险报酬率为8%,某投资者除自有资金外,还借入20%的资金,将所有的资金用于购买市场组合,则总期望报酬率和总标准差分别为()。
2014年,全社会用电量55233亿千瓦时。分产业看,第一产业用电量994.亿千瓦时,同比下降0.2%;第二产业用电量40650亿千瓦时,同比增长3.7%;第三产业用电量6660亿千瓦时,同比增长6.4%;城乡居民生活用电量6928亿千瓦时,同比增长2.2
简谈赫尔巴特的课程理论。
联系实际,论述我国社会主义法治建设在构建社会主义和谐社会中的保障作用。要求:观点明确,说理充分,条理清晰,语言规范、流畅。(2010年论述70)
PaoloFril,chairmanandscientificofficerofGeneDupe,basedinSanMelito,California,isamanwithadream.Thedreamisa
最新回复
(
0
)