首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
7 Things You Can’t Say in Canada Attacking our sacred cows (things or people that cannot be criticized) may turn you into on
7 Things You Can’t Say in Canada Attacking our sacred cows (things or people that cannot be criticized) may turn you into on
admin
2013-05-04
48
问题
7 Things You Can’t Say in Canada
Attacking our sacred cows (things or people that cannot be criticized) may turn you into one looked down upon by all others — but it can also be a lot of fun.
Every culture has its unacknowledged taboos — the things you are forbidden to say or do in polite company, the accepted truths you are not allowed to doubt. You might think that a liberal, open-minded country like Canada would be free of such taboos, but you’d be wrong. In spite of our belief in our own enlightened tolerance, some things are simply not open to debate. If you try, you’re bound to shock the neighbors.
It’s risky to question the wisdom of the tribe. You might get stoned. On the other hand, some people might come near to you very quietly afterwards and confess that they secretly agree.
So here’s a challenge to a few of our nation’s most widely held beliefs. You say these things in public at your own danger. I will be elaborating on these points over the months to come. Feel free to stone me or secretly agree — or, even better, add to the list. At the very least, they’re sure to start a good dinner-party fight.
Margaret Atwood writes some really awful books.
The queen of Canadian Literature dominates the literary world like a giant. Nobody has won more awards than she has, and nobody is more feared. There is no such a thing as a bad review of a Margaret Atwood book in Canada. That’s too bad, because many of her books are tedious and unreadable, full of tortuous plots and unpleasant characters. Why will no one say so? Because we’re grateful that she’s put us on the global map. If they do, they’ll never work in this country again.
Recycling is a waste of time and money.
Once upon a time it was easy to put out the trash. Today, the Garbage Gestapo rules our lives.
Every household has become a mini version of the village dump, and every one of us has become a garbage picker, carefully separating our organic waste from our bottles and papers, and worrying about where our different kinds of garbage are supposed to go. Don’t try to sort a wine bottle into the wrong bag! The trash police will punish you. The truth about recycling is that it’s a giant waste of dollars and doesn’t help the environment. But don’t tell your kids. They won’t believe you. They’ve been brainwashed.
Only private enterprise can save public health care.
Tommy Douglas, the CBC’s Greatest Canadian, brought us universal health care. But even his plan didn’t originally pay for everybody’s minor diseases, such as ingrown toenails. His primary goal was to make sure nobody faced financial ruin if they got sick. Today we have a system where controlling costs is more important than treating patients, and where ideology is disabling us. In some places, including Toronto, people go blind waiting for cataract (白内障) surgery. The government could restore their sight tomorrow simply by sending them to a private clinic instead of to a hospital. The cost to the government would be exactly the same. But in Canada, private is a dirty word, and so the government would rather you go blind. Poor Tommy would be spinning in his grave.
David Suzuki is bad for the environment.
From global warming to farmed salmon and genetically modified crops, David Suzuki has just one message: The end is near.
He is our homegrown prophet of doom who can predict what will happen in the future. He advocates the essential wickedness of the human race. Like a modern Savonarola, he warns that unless we cast our material possessions into the bonfire, we’re all going to hell.
The trouble with this predicting vision is that people are starting to isolate from the environment. And our hugely expensive investment in the unworkable Kyoto treaty, which Mr. Suzuki tells us doesn’t go nearly far enough, will wipe out more practical measures to cut smog and clean up our waste sites.
A national daycare program won’t do a thing to help poor kids.
Cheap national daycare! Who could be against it? It’s supposed to give kids a better start in life, and nobody can object to that. But in Quebec, where the program started, universal daycare has turned out to be nothing more than a giant (and extremely costly) subsidy for relatively well-off middle-class parents. Few poor parents use the system.
No doubt convenient daycare is a gift set by god for many people. But so far there is no definitive evidence that kids who go to daycare go on to do better in school or in life. So if we want to invest billions in helping kids, why are we spending it on the kids who need help the least?
Group of Seven artists are overexposed genre painters.
I like A.Y. Jackson as much as you do. His paintings remind me of when I went to summer camp. I grew up with a reproduction of The West Wind hanging in our living room. (That was by Tom Thomson, who wasn’t really a member of Group of Seven, but never mind.) Group of Seven were the first artists to depict the wild Canadian landscape, and they were bold young rebels in their time.
But that time was 80 years ago. Today their work is the essence of bourgeois picture-postcard art — the kind of art safe to take your mother to see. Enough, already. Maybe it’s time we moved on.
The United States is the greatest force for good the world has ever known.
Of all the shocking things you can say around the dinner table, this is the most shocking one. After all, America-criticizing is part of our national identity.
At best, we see our neighbor as a well-intentioned but arrogant and wrong-doing bully that throws its weight around too much. At worst, we see our neighbor as one of the most evil nations in the world. And yet, right now, hundreds of millions of people in desperately poor parts of the world are being liberated from millennia of suffering and serfdom. Why? Because of the United States, which has spread its idea of economic freedom — and its purchasing power — around the world.
In the author’s point of view, Margaret Atwood’s books are______.
选项
A、thrilling
B、monotonous
C、encouraging
D、simple-minded
答案
B
解析
该句提到,That’s too bad,because many of her books are tedious and unreadable,[B]monotonous意为“单调的”,与tedious意思一致,故为答案。[A]thrilling意为“令人兴奋的”。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/RPB7777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
Forthispart,youareallowed30minutestowriteashortessayentitledTuitionBasedonPerCredit-hourBasis.Youshouldwri
Nowadays,socialnetworkinggetstoomuchattention.Peopleusecyberspacetoshareinformationandconnectwithwhotheythinki
Nowadays,socialnetworkinggetstoomuchattention.Peopleusecyberspacetoshareinformationandconnectwithwhotheythinki
Schoolslookingtobancellphonesmayhaveanewexcuse:agrowingnumberofpeoplearedevelopinganallergytometalinthed
Forthispart,youareallowed30minutestowriteashortessayentitledIsRichSecondGenerationtheFallenGeneration?Yoush
Alastingmarriagedoesnotalwayssignalahappymarriage.Plentyof【C1】______coupleshavestayedtogetherforchildren,religio
A、Fromtheauction.B、Fromthewoman.C、FromtheInternet.D、Fromthesupermarket.A推理判断题。对话中当男士参观到卧室时询问女士是不是配备所有的家具,女士表示男士需要自己购
A、Recordofchangesinhisownintelligence.B、Workwithpeopleindifferentclimates.C、Recordsoftemperaturechanges.D、Allr
I’vealwaysbeenanoptimistandIsupposethatisrootedinmybeliefthatthepowerofcreativityandintelligencecanmaketh
A、Easyenough.B、Easierthanthewomanfeels.C、Verydifficult.D、Normal.C选项中的Easy,difficult,Normal等表明,本题考查对某事的看法。女士认为考试很简单,男士说
随机试题
项目后评价的效益预测是以()为起点的。
项目信用保证结构中的直接担保不包括()。
股票的内在价值的高低与持有该股票的时间长短有关。()
材料:人活在世上,不但有身体,还有头脑和心胸——对此请勿从解剖学上理解。人脑是怎样的一种东西,科学还不能说清楚。心胸是怎么回事就更难说清。对我自己来说,心胸是我在生活中想要达到的最低目标。某件事有悖于我的心胸,我就认为它不值得一做;某个人有悖于我
注意事项1.申论考试是对考生阅读理解能力、归纳概括能力、分析综合能力、提出和解决问题能力、文字表达能力的测试。2.参考时限:阅读资料30分钟,作答90分钟。3.仔细阅读给定资料,按照后面提出的“申论要求”作答。给定资
甲对公安机关限制其人身自由的行政强制措施不服,向公安机关所在地和户籍所在地的法院均提起了行政诉讼。关于该案的管辖下列说法正确的是()。
设A=若a是使A正定的正整数,求正交变换化二次型xTAx为标准形,并写出所用坐标变换.
生活是一望无际的大海,人便是大海上的一叶小舟,大海没有风平浪静的时候,所以,人也总是有【139】也有忧愁。当无名的烦恼袭来,失意与彷徨燃烧着每一根神经。但是,朋友,别忘了守住一颗宁静的心,痛苦将不再有。每个人的前面都有【140】通向远方的路,崎岖
Aspricesandbuildingcostskeeprising,the"do—it—yourself"(DIY)trend(趋势)intheU.S.continuestogrow."Weneededfu
Thegrizzled,tough-lookingcartooncharacterwarnedAmericansnottochangetheirfoodhabits.Whole-graincerealsandhigh-fi
最新回复
(
0
)