首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
What if our society uses new-found technologies of "genetic engineering" to interfere with the biological nature of human beings
What if our society uses new-found technologies of "genetic engineering" to interfere with the biological nature of human beings
admin
2013-03-27
61
问题
What if our society uses new-found technologies of "genetic engineering" to interfere with the biological nature of human beings? Might that not be disastrous?
What about cloning, for instance?
Cloning is a term originally used in connection with nonsexual reproduction of plants and very simple animals. Now it is coming into use in connection with higher animals, since biologists are finding ways of starting with an individual cell of a grown animal and inducing it to multiply in the same way in the future.
But is cloning a safe thing to unleash on society? Might it not be used for destructive purposes? For instance, might not some ruling group decide to clone their submissive, downtrodden peasantry, and thus produce endless hordes of semi-robots who will slave to keep a few in luxury and who may even serve as endless ranks of soldiers designed to conquer the rest of the world?
A dreadful thought, but an unnecessary fear. For one thing, there is no need to clone for the purpose. The ordinary method of reproduction produces all the human beings that are needed and as rapidly as is needed. Right now, the ordinary method is producing so many people as to put civilization in danger of imminent destruction. What more can cloning do?
Secondly, unskilled semi-robots cannot be successfully pitted against the skilled users of machine, either on farms, in factories or in armies. Any nation depending on downtrodden masses will find itself an easy mark for exploitation by a less populous but more skilled and versatile society. This has happened in the past often enough.
But even if we forget about self-hordes, what about the cloning of a relatively few individuals? There are rich people who could afford the expense, or politicians who could have the influence for it, or the gifted who could undergo it by popular demand. There can be two of a particular banker or governor or scientist—or three—or a thousand. Might this not create a kind of privileged caste, who would reproduce themselves in greater and greater numbers, and who would gradually take over the world?
Before we grow concerned about this, we must ask whether there will really be any great demand for cloning. Would you want to be cloned? The new individual that is formed by your cell will have your genes and therefore your appearance and, possibly, talents, but he will not be you. The clone will be, at best, merely your identical twin. Identical twins share the same genetic pattern, but they each have their own individuality and are separate persons.
Cloning is not a pathway to immortality, then, because your consciousness does not survive in your clone, any more than it would in your identical twin if you had one.
In fact, your clone would be far less than your identical twin. What shapes and forms a personality is not genes alone, but all the environment to which it is exposed. Identical twins grow up in identical surroundings, in the same family, and under each other’s influence. A clone of yourself, perhaps thirty or forty years younger would grow up in a different world altogether and would be shaped by influences that would be sure to make him less and less like you as he grows older.
He may even earn your jealousy. After all, you are old and he is young. You may once have been poor and struggled to become well-to-do, but he will be well-to-do from the start. The mere fact that you won’t be able to view him as a child, but as another competing and better-advantaged you, may accentuate the jealousy.
No! Imagine that, after some initial experiments, the demand for cloning will be virtually nonexistent.
The central theme of the essay is______.
选项
A、genetic engineers are experimenting with cloning
B、the cloning of human could produce a privileged class
C、worries about the dangers of human cloning are ill-founded
D、personality traits cannot be passed on through cloning
答案
C
解析
通读全文可知,文章开头就以问题的形式提出:“如果我们的社会使用新发现的技术‘基因工程’干扰人的生物性会如何呢?这可能会带来灾难性的影响吗?”接着作者解释,我们没必要对克隆之事恐惧和担心。因此C项为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/RtmO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Noreferencebook,perhapsnobookofanykindexcepttheBible,issowidelyusedas"thedictionary".Evenhousesthathavefe
When,intheageofautomation,mansearchesforaworkertodothetedious,unpleasantjobsthatareimpossibletomechanize,h
NexttoSirAndrewintheclub-roomsitsCaptainSentry,agentlemanofgreatcourage,goodunderstanding,butinvinciblemodest
Theroleofgovernmentinenvironmentalmanagementisdifficultbutinescapable.Sometimes,thestatetriestomanagetheresour
InarecentbookentitledThePsychicLifeofInsects,ProfessorBouviersaysthatwemustbecarefulnottocreditthelittlew
Onlyrecently______possibletoseparatethecomponentsoffragrantsubstancesandtodeterminetheirchemicalcomposition.
WiththeUSeconomyslowingdown,layoffsareeverywhere.Noindustryisspared.Ifyouenduphavingtostartover,inaddition
Likethepopulationexplosion,thescientificandtechnologicalrevolutionbegantopickupspeedslowlyduringtheeighteenthc
Inatelephonesurveyofmorethan2,000adults.21%saidtheybelievedthesunrevolved(旋转)aroundtheearth.An【1】7%didnot
Thepolicewerealertedthattheescapedcriminalmightbeinthe______.
随机试题
下列细菌感染常见铁锈色痰的是
剩余法除适用于土地估价外,也可用来估测具体开发项目的预期利润。()
镇区用地规划布局的镇布局原则有()。
下列主体中,可以作为会计主体的有()。
下列说法中不正确的是()。
关于企业所得税,下列说法正确的是()。
根据材料回答下列问题。华尔街的金融海啸,将颠覆笼罩在世界许多人头脑中的一种根深蒂固的盲目崇拜和迷信,一种曾经被灌输给世界人民的历史观和文化观。那种弥漫全世界的迷信或思潮究竟是什么呢?简言之,它是一种“新蒙昧主义”,也就是一种“美国什么都好”、“代表了人类
假如一个人,从他的少年时代开始,就时刻地守住________,用它来学习、劳动,________决不容忍无聊的玩乐来剥夺任何一个早晨,也决不允许让缥缈的幻想来骗取任何一个夜晚,每迎接一个黎明都有的斗志,每送走一个黄昏,都有前进一步的喜悦,那么,他的生命将成
“批判的武器当然不能代替武器的批判,物质的力量只能用物质的力量来摧毁;但理论一经群众掌握,也会变成物质力量。”这一论断体现出的哲学思想有
Genesarethebiologicalinstructions______ineverycell.
最新回复
(
0
)