首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
What if our society uses new-found technologies of "genetic engineering" to interfere with the biological nature of human beings
What if our society uses new-found technologies of "genetic engineering" to interfere with the biological nature of human beings
admin
2013-03-27
29
问题
What if our society uses new-found technologies of "genetic engineering" to interfere with the biological nature of human beings? Might that not be disastrous?
What about cloning, for instance?
Cloning is a term originally used in connection with nonsexual reproduction of plants and very simple animals. Now it is coming into use in connection with higher animals, since biologists are finding ways of starting with an individual cell of a grown animal and inducing it to multiply in the same way in the future.
But is cloning a safe thing to unleash on society? Might it not be used for destructive purposes? For instance, might not some ruling group decide to clone their submissive, downtrodden peasantry, and thus produce endless hordes of semi-robots who will slave to keep a few in luxury and who may even serve as endless ranks of soldiers designed to conquer the rest of the world?
A dreadful thought, but an unnecessary fear. For one thing, there is no need to clone for the purpose. The ordinary method of reproduction produces all the human beings that are needed and as rapidly as is needed. Right now, the ordinary method is producing so many people as to put civilization in danger of imminent destruction. What more can cloning do?
Secondly, unskilled semi-robots cannot be successfully pitted against the skilled users of machine, either on farms, in factories or in armies. Any nation depending on downtrodden masses will find itself an easy mark for exploitation by a less populous but more skilled and versatile society. This has happened in the past often enough.
But even if we forget about self-hordes, what about the cloning of a relatively few individuals? There are rich people who could afford the expense, or politicians who could have the influence for it, or the gifted who could undergo it by popular demand. There can be two of a particular banker or governor or scientist—or three—or a thousand. Might this not create a kind of privileged caste, who would reproduce themselves in greater and greater numbers, and who would gradually take over the world?
Before we grow concerned about this, we must ask whether there will really be any great demand for cloning. Would you want to be cloned? The new individual that is formed by your cell will have your genes and therefore your appearance and, possibly, talents, but he will not be you. The clone will be, at best, merely your identical twin. Identical twins share the same genetic pattern, but they each have their own individuality and are separate persons.
Cloning is not a pathway to immortality, then, because your consciousness does not survive in your clone, any more than it would in your identical twin if you had one.
In fact, your clone would be far less than your identical twin. What shapes and forms a personality is not genes alone, but all the environment to which it is exposed. Identical twins grow up in identical surroundings, in the same family, and under each other’s influence. A clone of yourself, perhaps thirty or forty years younger would grow up in a different world altogether and would be shaped by influences that would be sure to make him less and less like you as he grows older.
He may even earn your jealousy. After all, you are old and he is young. You may once have been poor and struggled to become well-to-do, but he will be well-to-do from the start. The mere fact that you won’t be able to view him as a child, but as another competing and better-advantaged you, may accentuate the jealousy.
No! Imagine that, after some initial experiments, the demand for cloning will be virtually nonexistent.
The central theme of the essay is______.
选项
A、genetic engineers are experimenting with cloning
B、the cloning of human could produce a privileged class
C、worries about the dangers of human cloning are ill-founded
D、personality traits cannot be passed on through cloning
答案
C
解析
通读全文可知,文章开头就以问题的形式提出:“如果我们的社会使用新发现的技术‘基因工程’干扰人的生物性会如何呢?这可能会带来灾难性的影响吗?”接着作者解释,我们没必要对克隆之事恐惧和担心。因此C项为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/RtmO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Manyinstructorsbelievethataninformal,relaxedclassroomenvironmentis【C1】______tolearningandinnovation.Itisnotuncom
Manyinstructorsbelievethataninformal,relaxedclassroomenvironmentis【C1】______tolearningandinnovation.Itisnotuncom
Manyinstructorsbelievethataninformal,relaxedclassroomenvironmentis【C1】______tolearningandinnovation.Itisnotuncom
DesertificationinthearidUnitedStatesisflagrant.Groundwatersuppliesbeneathvaststretchesoflandaredroppingprecipit
Perhapsallcriminalsshouldberequiredtocarrycardswhichread;Fragile;HandlewithCare.Itwillneverso,thesedaystog
Abigdateisnervewrackingenough,letalonehavingtoworryaboutwhattowear.Haveyoueverquestionedwhetheryourensembl
Itisoftenobservedthattheagedspendmuchtimethinkingandtalkingabouttheirpastlives,【71】aboutthefuture.Theseremin
Scholarsmaintainthatsocialdevelopmentcaneasily____languagechanges.
Thepolicewerealertedthattheescapedcriminalmightbeinthe______.
随机试题
PositiveAttitudetowardsFailureIclearlyrememberaperiodduringwhichIfeltlikeafailure.ButwhatI【B1】______learn
食物蛋白质的互补作用是指
患者,男,29岁,输血后感染艾滋病,这是经
机体抗御外邪的正气所概括的物质不包括()
某公司的办公楼建设项目已于2005年3月1日领取施工许可证。根据《建筑法》关于施工许可的有关规定,下列说法正确的有( )。
抽样调查的一般步骤不包括()。
关于商品的使用价值,下列说法正确的有()。
“培养小班儿童愉快地进餐,正确地使用小勺,饭后擦嘴”,这属于幼儿园教育目标层次中的()
A、 B、 C、 D、 B每个图形都由简单直线组成,首先考虑线条数。每行和每列线条数之和都是15。
(2011上监理)还原速度最快的数据备份策略是______。
最新回复
(
0
)