首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Sir Howard Davies, the man with the job of deciding whether Britain needs a new airport, must be looking with some alarm at the
Sir Howard Davies, the man with the job of deciding whether Britain needs a new airport, must be looking with some alarm at the
admin
2015-06-14
71
问题
Sir Howard Davies, the man with the job of deciding whether Britain needs a new airport, must be looking with some alarm at the precedents. In 1971, after more than 18 months of work, the Roskill commission recommended that a four-runway airport to serve London be built at Cublington, near Aylesbury.
When Michael Noble, then minister for trade, opened the debate on the commission’s findings in the Commons, he said of its authors: " I hope that they may draw some comfort from one of my hon friends who said that the fact that he totally rejected their conclusion did not in any way diminish his admiration for the way in which they had done their work and presented their report. "
Their plan, of course, never got off the drawing board.
Committing the Conservatives to blocking a third runway at Heathrow was a key plank of David Cameron’s strategy to detoxify the Tory brand and prove that he would put polar bears before sharp-suited businessmen. It was also built on political expediency—he needed to win Conservative seats in the area. Further, it was a recognition that the building of a third runway would hurt Britain’s then leading role in reducing global carbon emissions.
But with the economy trapped in a deep malaise Cameron is having a rethink. There is a strong lobby that suggests that UK needs extra airport capacity in order to boost future economic prospects. Also, the UK is on track to meet its Kyoto targets, albeit partly because of economic weakness. There is, too, an argument that the tax system may be a better way of reducing the number of unnecessary flights than a ban on building new runways. Flight travel is simply too cheap compared with rail fares—this is the fault of a tax system that gives an advantage to airlines.
George Osborne now firmly believes that if the UK really wants to build an economy that can properly connect with the rest of the world it needs more airport capacity. But the economic case is being driven largely by self-interested parties, not least British Airways, the British Airports Authority and the bodies that represent them.
It will be a crucial part of the Davies commission to identify the economic benefits a new airport or runway would deliver. Multinational companies make inward investment decisions on the basis of a whole range of factors, including the skills of the workforce, the strength of the currency and the generosity of state support for industry. Whether the chief executive can jet in direct from Chicago or Shanghai may be a marginal consideration.
However, those advocating the development of a hub airport may have a case. If Britain allows its one airport that comes close to being an international hub to become ever more clogged up while Amsterdam, Frankfurt, Madrid and Paris become transit points for Europeans, including enterprising Brits, wanting to get to the fast-growing economies of China, India or Brazil, there is a risk that economic opportunities will be missed, ambitions stunted, jobs lost.
However, if any British government is to press the case for extra airport capacity, it needs to make a convincing case for continuing to meet its ambitious carbon emissions target. As this paper said in 2008: "It will require a radical programme of wave and wind turbine construction, nuclear industry expansion and the building of underground vaults to store the carbon dioxide that currently pours from the nation’s coal, oil and gas power plants."
Unfortunately, there is absolutely no evidence that this government’s energy policy is fit for that purpose. Indeed, as we state elsewhere in these pages, the government’s desire to pursue a dash for gas as a future energy strategy is precisely the wrong direction of travel.
Even if the case for a hub airport is established, Heathrow is not the only answer: Heathrow already creates all-but-unbearable noise, pollution and disruption for unlucky residents, and its transport links are groaning. Of those affected by noise pollution in Europe, 30% live in and around Heathrow. Is it really sensible to build more airline capacity in the middle of a major population centre?
There is a plausible case that bringing in as many planes as possible—the proposed estuary airport-over sea instead of hundreds of thousands of rooftops makes more sense. As importantly, a giant new airport would provide a powerful economic boost for an area where unemployment is high. Although characterised, until now, as a Boris Johnson vanity project, there is support from politicians of all persuasions to the east of London to try and create a hub)—in all senses—which would address the historical inequalities and poverty to the east of the capital.
There is no easy solution. Davies will need wisdom and a good dose of political nous to weigh up the issues—the financial and environmental costs and any economic advantages. He should use his authority to seize the initiative and insist that the question of airport capacity in the UK be settled sooner rather than later. Otherwise, the likelihood of a repeat of the Roskill commission is all too likely.
"There is no easy solution" in the final paragraph probably means that
选项
A、the government doesn’t support Howard Davies’s decision.
B、it’s a tough decision facing both financial and environmental costs.
C、the public hold different opinions on where to build the airport.
D、Davies can’t identify the economic benefits brought by a new airport.
答案
B
解析
推断题。由最后一段第二句可知,Davies需要智慧和政治常识来权衡所有问题,包括金融、环境成本以及所有经济优势等,故[B]正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/RyOO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
WhichofthefollowingisNOTatypeofinstitutioninU.S.?
Note-takingSkillsNote-takingrequiresahighlevelofabilityinmanyskills,particularlyinthefollowingfourmostimport
TheProblemsofTakingEnglishCoursesThroughEnglishWhenstudentstakecoursesthroughthemediumofEnglish,theyhaveto
Thenatureoflanguageisthenatureofhumanthoughtandhumanaction,forlanguageisnomorenorlessthanthetoolofboth
Thebasicdistinctionbetweenachievementandproficiencytestsistobefoundinthedifferentpurposesforwhichthetwokinds
InWesternCulturesyoudon’topenacloseddoorwithoutknocking,unlessitisyourownoroneclearlyinapublicplace.Or【M1
寒暑表降到冰点下十八度的时候,我们也是在廊下睡觉。每夜最熟识的就是天上的星辰了。也不过是点点闪烁的光明,而相看惯了,偶然不见,也有些想望与无聊。连夜雨雪,一点星光都看不见。荷和我拥衾对坐,在廊子的两角,遥遥淡活。荷指着说:“你看维纳斯1升起
由小学到中学,所修习的无非是一些普通的基本知识。就是大学四年,所授课业也还是相当粗浅的学识。世人常,称大学为“最高学府”,这名称易滋误解,好像过此以上即无学问可言。大学的研究所才是初步研究学问的所在,在这里做学问也只能算是初涉藩臂,注重的是研究学问的方法与
Brazil’scommercewithAfricahasbiginvestmentinallofthefollowingEXCEPT
Itisreportedthatacademicdishonestyhasbecomeendemicinalllevelsofeducation.Evensomefamousprofessorsandexpertsc
随机试题
双重绝缘是兼有()的绝缘。
西非大片地区无间日疟,部分居住在美国或其他地区的黑人对间日疟不敏感,推测有关的原因是他们
A.无菌创口B.污染创口C.感染创口D.一期愈合创口E.延期愈合创口与口鼻腔相通或在口腔内手术的创口属于()
半机械化吊装方法中,一种吊装方法是将直立的桅杆与放在地面上的设备连接起来,然后桅杆旋转90°,由垂直位置变为水平位置,而设备则由水平位置变成垂直位置,此种吊装方法为()。
在进行基金产品风险评价时,应当依据的因素不包括()。
教师在职业生活中,调节和处理与他人、与社会、与集体、与职业工作关系所应遵守的基本行为规范和行为准则,以及在此基础上所表现出来的观念意识和行为品质叫作()。
德国古典哲学的主要代表人物是()。
从所给的四个选项中,选择最合适的一个填入问号处,使之呈现一定的规律性:
“地球一小时”是WWF为应对全球气候变化所发起的一项可持续性全球活动,熄灯1小时的黑暗给人们带来的象征性危机,会加深人们节约能源、保护环境的意识,_______________,人们便自觉地在日常生活中_______________节约、环保理念。
Americans’circleofcloseconfidantshasshrunkdramaticallyinthepasttwodecadesbutthenumberofpeoplewhosaythey【M1】_
最新回复
(
0
)