首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In early April a series of reports appeared online in the United States and the United Kingdom la-menting(抱怨)the "lazy French".
In early April a series of reports appeared online in the United States and the United Kingdom la-menting(抱怨)the "lazy French".
admin
2016-10-18
85
问题
In early April a series of reports appeared online in the United States and the United Kingdom la-menting(抱怨)the "lazy French". A new labor law in France had apparently banned organizations from e-mailing their employees after 6 p. m. In fact, it turned out to be more a case of "lazy journalists" than "lazy French" : as The Economist explained, the "law" was not a law at all but a labor agreement aimed at improving health among a specific group of professionals, and there wasn’t even a hard curfew(宵禁)for digital communication.
Like all myths, however, this one revealed a set of abiding values subscribed to by the folk who perpetuated if. Brits and Americans have long suspected that the French(and others)are goofing off while they—the good corporate soldiers—continue to toil away. They’re proud about it too. A Gallup poll, released in May, found that most U. S. workers see their constant connection with officemates as a positive. In the age of the smartphone, there’s no such thing as "downtime" , and we profess to be happier— and more productive—for it.
Are we, though? After reviewing thousands of books, articles and papers on the topic and interviewing dozens of experts in fields from neurobiology and psychology to education and literature, I don’t think so. When we accept this new and permanent ambient(周围的)workload—checking business news in bed or responding to coworkers’ emails during breakfast—we may believe that we are dedicated, tireless workers. But, actually, we’re mostly just getting the small, easy things done. Being busy does not equate to being effective.
And let’s not forget about ambient play, which often distracts us from accomplishing our most important tasks. Facebook and Twitter report that their sites are most active during office hours. After all, the empioyee who’s required to respond to her boss on Sunday morning will think nothing of responding to friends on Wednesday afternoon. And research shows that these digital derailments are costly: it’s not only the minutes lost responding to a tweet but also the time and energy required to "reenter" the original task. As Douglas Gentile, a professor at Iowa State University who studies the effects of media on attention spans, explains, "Everyone who thinks they’re good at multitasking is wrong. We’re actually multi-switching and giving ourselves extra work. "
Each shift of focus sets our brain back and creates a cumulative attention debt, resulting in a harried workforce incapable of producing sustained burst of creative energy. Constant connection means that we’re "always at work", yes, but also that we’re "never at work"—fully.
People and organizations looking for brave new ideas or significant critical thinking need to recognize that disconnection is therefore sometimes preferable to connection. You don’t ask a jogger who just ran six miles to compete in a sprint, so why would you ask an executive who’s been answering a pinging phone all morning to deliver top-drawer content at his next meeting?
Some parts of the workforce do rely on constant real-time communication. But others should demand and be given proper breaks from the digital maelstrom. Batch-processing email is one easy solution. Do it a few times a day and reserve the rest of your time for real work. Most colleagues and clients will survive without a response for three hours, and if it’s truly urgent, they can pick up the phone.
The great tech historian Melvin Kranzberg said, "Technology is neither good nor bad, nor is it neutral. " That statement should become a real tenant of the information age. I don’t advocate abstinence or blanket rules like that fictional post-6 p. m. email ban.
However, I do think our cult of connectivity has gone too far. We can’t keep falling prey to ambient work or play. Instead, we must actively decide on our level of tech engagement at different times to maximize productivity, success and happiness.
According to the author, which of the following is NOT true?
选项
A、Being busy in responding to emails during breakfast does not mean being efficient.
B、We are dedicated and tireless workers who get small things done in our spare time.
C、Our belief about connectivity has been out of the right track.
D、To maximize productivity and happiness, we should make wise use of technology.
答案
B
解析
推理判断题。B)项“我们是不知疲倦的商场精英,利用细碎时间把小事情都处理了”,而文章第三段第三、四句说“……我们也许会认为我们是不知疲倦的商场精英。然而事实上,在这些时间里我们主要处理的不过是简单易行的琐事,忙并不等于高效”,可见B)选项与文意相悖,故B)选项正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/S6F7777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
InearlyAprilaseriesofreportsappearedonlineintheUnitedStatesandtheUnitedKingdomlamenting(痛惜)the"lazyFrench".
Veryoldpeopledoraisemoralproblemsforalmosteveryonewhocomesintocontactwiththem.Theirvalues,thiscan’tbe【B1】___
A、Themuseummightbeclosedbeforetheyarrive.B、Theyshouldfindadifferentwaytogettothemuseum.C、Hewon’tbeableto
Inapurelycompetitivemarket,thesupplierofgoodsandserviceshasnocontroloverthemarketprice,becauseheproducestoo
ThePopularityofMicro-blog1.近年来,微博用户人数逐年增加2.分析微博流行的原因3.我的看法
中国的体育运动(physicalcultureandsports)经历了几千年的发展,但是直到1949年中华人民共和国成立之后体育运动才成了一项国家事业。中国发展体育运动的目的是:扩大体育宣传、增强人民体质、提高整个国家的运动技能、创造新纪录,来促进
Forthispart,youareallowed30minutestowriteanessayentitledOnSmoking.Youressayshouldstartwithabriefdescriptio
A、Iteventuallyturnsintoheat.B、Itisusedinavarietyofforms.C、Itsuseischieflyresponsibleforairpollution.D、Part
A、Thewomanhasjusthadherlunch.B、Theman’ssuitgotreallydirty.C、Themanenjoyshotcoffeeverymuch.D、Thewomandoesa
随机试题
犯罪的社会危害性:
业主采用招标方式选择工程咨询单位时,应列入招标文件的是()。
建设单位应当自工程竣工验收合格之日起()日内,向工程所在地的县级以上地方人民政府建设行政主管部门备案。
下列各项中,属于企业“营业收入”核算内容的有()。
房地产开发可以划分的四个阶段是()
自我意识包含下列哪几种成分?()
既强调说理教育,又强调建立健全学校的规章制度的德育原则是
已知被评估设备在评估基准日的主材费为100万元,设备的主材费为全部成本的85%,行业平均成本利润率为10%,不考虑其他因素,则设备的重置成本最接近于()万元。
十六届三中全会通过的《中共中央关于完善社会主义市场经济体制若干问题的决定》提出大力发展和积极引导非公有制经济,主要包括以下内容
Itwasjustafootnotecomparedwiththemoreinfectiousdisasterthatkilledmillionsmorepeoplein1918,butthe1957influen
最新回复
(
0
)