首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it — convicting the guilty and acquitti
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it — convicting the guilty and acquitti
admin
2010-07-06
21
问题
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it — convicting the guilty and acquitting the innocent? It is often said that the British trial system is more like a game than a serious attempt to do justice. The lawyers on each side are so engrossed in playing bard to win, Challenging each other and the judge on technical points, that the object of finding out the truth is almost forgotten. All the effort is concentrated on the big day, on the dramatic cross examination of the key Witnesses in front of the jury. Critics like to compare our "adversarial" system (resembling two adversaries engaged in a contest) with the continental "inquisitorial" system, under which the judge play a more important inquiring role.
In early times, in the Middle Ages, the systems of trial across Europe were similar. At that time trial by "ordeal" — especially a religious event — was the main way of testing guilt or innocence. When this way eventually abandoned the two systems parted company. On the continent church-trained legal officials took over the function of both prosecuting and judging, while in England these were largely left to lay people, the Justice of the Peace and the jurymen who were illiterate and this meant that all the evidence had to be put to them orally. This historical accident dominates procedure even today, with all evidence being given in open court by word of mouth on the crucial day.
On the other hand, in France for instance, all the evidence is written before the trial under supervision by an investigating judge. This exhaustive pretrial looks very undramatic; much of its is just a public checking of the written records already gathered.
The Americans adopted the British system lock, stock and barrel and enshrined it in their constitution. But, while the basic features of our systems are common, there are now significant differences in the way serious cases are handled. First, because the USA has virtually no contempt of court laws to prevent pretrial publicity in the newspaper and on television, Americans lawyers are allowed to question jurors about knowledge and beliefs.
In Britain this is virtually never allowed, and a random selection of jurors who are presumed not to be prejudiced are empanelled. Secondly, there is no separate profession of barrister in the United States, and both prosecution and defense lawyers who are to present cases in court prepare themselves. They go out and visit the scene, track down and interview witnesses, and familiarize themselves personally with the background. In Britain it is the solicitor who prepares the case, and the barrister who appears in court is not even allowed to meet witnesses beforehand. British barristers also alternate doing both prosecution and defense work. Being kept distant from the preparation and regularly appearing for both sides, barristers are said to avoid becoming too personally involved, and can approach cases more dispassionately. American lawyers, however, often know their cases better.
Reformers rightly want to learn from other countries’ mistakes and successes. But what is clear is that justice systems, largely because they are the result of long historical growth, are peculiarly difficult to adapt piecemeal.
In Britain, newspapers ______.
选项
A、do the same as American newspapers do
B、are not interested in publishing details about the trial before it takes place
C、are not allowed to publish details about the trial before it takes place
D、are allowed to publish details about the trial before it takes place
答案
C
解析
细节题。答案信息对应于第五段第一句,其中的this is virtually never allowed指的就是不允许媒体提前公布与审判有关的细节,即C 。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/SGDd777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语四级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语四级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
Wherewastheletterprobablyplacedmanyyearsago?
ThoughPaulisdisabled,hemanagedtomovearoundinthehouse.
ThoughPaulisdisabled,hemanagedtomovearoundinthehouse.
TherecentsocialandeconomicchangesintheUShavegreatimpactonalltheAmericanhousingsystem.
In1959theaverageAmericanfamilypaid$989forayear’ssupplyoffood.In1972thefamilypaid$1,311.Thatwasaprice
Whichpassage(s)say(s)that….adultsputtoomuchemphasisonchildren’sintellectualdevelopment?
"Junkscience"ishowElliotMorley,Britain’sministerresponsibleforgeneticallymodifiedfarming,describesstudiesthatcla
"Junkscience"ishowElliotMorley,Britain’sministerresponsibleforgeneticallymodifiedfarming,describesstudiesthatcla
"Junkscience"ishowElliotMorley,Britain’sministerresponsibleforgeneticallymodifiedfarming,describesstudiesthatcla
Thepassengerswillhavea15-minute______stopatBloomington.
随机试题
下列操作中,适宜使用宏的是()。
男性,35岁。周期性上腹痛3年,常空腹发作,夜间加重,进餐后可缓解。若该患者拒绝纤维胃镜检查,为明确诊断,应首选的检查是
根据马斯洛的人的基本需要层次理论,属于安全需要的是()。
关于产程,下列哪项是正确的
阳明头痛的引经药应首选
在Excel中,要将有数据且带有格式的单元格恢复为普通的单元格,先要选定该单元,然后使用()。
代理制作涉税文书的基本程序之一是()。
灾难性事件往往以突发的方式出现,给个人与社会造成巨大的破坏和影响。灾难的突发性决定了报道的___________是第一位的。最快的时间、最新的报道,才能满足人们在灾难发生后对___________的迫切需求和思想混乱时的心理需求。能否快速地投入新闻报道成为
BelowisachartshowingtheframeworkofTheFederalGovernment.Studycarefullythechartandwriteanessayofabout120word
()纪事()读书时间()人与自然()探索发现
最新回复
(
0
)