首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it — convicting the guilty and acquitti
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it — convicting the guilty and acquitti
admin
2010-07-06
19
问题
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it — convicting the guilty and acquitting the innocent? It is often said that the British trial system is more like a game than a serious attempt to do justice. The lawyers on each side are so engrossed in playing bard to win, Challenging each other and the judge on technical points, that the object of finding out the truth is almost forgotten. All the effort is concentrated on the big day, on the dramatic cross examination of the key Witnesses in front of the jury. Critics like to compare our "adversarial" system (resembling two adversaries engaged in a contest) with the continental "inquisitorial" system, under which the judge play a more important inquiring role.
In early times, in the Middle Ages, the systems of trial across Europe were similar. At that time trial by "ordeal" — especially a religious event — was the main way of testing guilt or innocence. When this way eventually abandoned the two systems parted company. On the continent church-trained legal officials took over the function of both prosecuting and judging, while in England these were largely left to lay people, the Justice of the Peace and the jurymen who were illiterate and this meant that all the evidence had to be put to them orally. This historical accident dominates procedure even today, with all evidence being given in open court by word of mouth on the crucial day.
On the other hand, in France for instance, all the evidence is written before the trial under supervision by an investigating judge. This exhaustive pretrial looks very undramatic; much of its is just a public checking of the written records already gathered.
The Americans adopted the British system lock, stock and barrel and enshrined it in their constitution. But, while the basic features of our systems are common, there are now significant differences in the way serious cases are handled. First, because the USA has virtually no contempt of court laws to prevent pretrial publicity in the newspaper and on television, Americans lawyers are allowed to question jurors about knowledge and beliefs.
In Britain this is virtually never allowed, and a random selection of jurors who are presumed not to be prejudiced are empanelled. Secondly, there is no separate profession of barrister in the United States, and both prosecution and defense lawyers who are to present cases in court prepare themselves. They go out and visit the scene, track down and interview witnesses, and familiarize themselves personally with the background. In Britain it is the solicitor who prepares the case, and the barrister who appears in court is not even allowed to meet witnesses beforehand. British barristers also alternate doing both prosecution and defense work. Being kept distant from the preparation and regularly appearing for both sides, barristers are said to avoid becoming too personally involved, and can approach cases more dispassionately. American lawyers, however, often know their cases better.
Reformers rightly want to learn from other countries’ mistakes and successes. But what is clear is that justice systems, largely because they are the result of long historical growth, are peculiarly difficult to adapt piecemeal.
In Britain, newspapers ______.
选项
A、do the same as American newspapers do
B、are not interested in publishing details about the trial before it takes place
C、are not allowed to publish details about the trial before it takes place
D、are allowed to publish details about the trial before it takes place
答案
C
解析
细节题。答案信息对应于第五段第一句,其中的this is virtually never allowed指的就是不允许媒体提前公布与审判有关的细节,即C 。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/SGDd777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语四级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语四级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
Supermarketshoppershaveneverbeenmorespoiltforchoice.Butjustwhenwethoughttraditionalsystemsofselectivefarmingh
Inathree-monthperiodlastyear,twoBrooklyniteshadtobecutoutoftheirapartmentsandcarriedtohospitalonstretchers
ThoughPaulisdisabled,hemanagedtomovearoundinthehouse.
ThoughPaulisdisabled,hemanagedtomovearoundinthehouse.
RecentsurveysshowthatJapaneseyouthhavebecomea"MeGeneration"thatrejectstraditionalvalues."Around1980manyJap
Wherecantheexpression"lameduck"beheard?
Payandproductivity,itisgenerallyassumed,shouldberelated.Buttherelationshipseemstoweaken【C1】________peoplegetold
Howcanforeign-traineddoctorsgetapprovedfromtheEducationalCommissiontocompletearesidencyintheU.S.?WhathaveAm
Whatiswrongwiththewoman’scurrentapartment?
Morethan30000driversandpassengerswhositinthefrontofthevehiclesarekilledorseriouslyinjuredeachyear.Ataspe
随机试题
能测定蛋白质的分子量的电泳技术为
患者,男,65岁。上颌无牙,下颌牙均健康,多次修复上半口义齿,但仍多次折断,现要求重新修复,医师设计金属基托式上半口义齿。医师取印模、取咬合关系,上架该上颌金属基托的厚度应为
由于内痔的动脉供应,其好发部位多在截石位的()。
建设项目总承包方编制项目设计建议书的依据是()。
大连中石油国际储运有限公司保税区油库由中国联合石油有限责任公司和大连港合资建设。油库一、二期共设20个原油贮罐(17个10万m3储罐,3个5万m3储罐),总储量为185万m3。该单位东侧为大连港罐区,总储量为132.45万m3(12个10万m3原油储罐和大
办公室主任:本办公室不打算使用循环再利用纸张。给用户的信件必须能留下好的印象。不能打印在劣质纸张上。文具供应商:循环再利用纸张不一定是劣质的。事实上,最初的纸张就是用可回收材料制造的。一直到19世纪50年代,由于碎屑原料供不应求,才使用木纤维作为造纸原料。
张某在丈夫的茶杯中倒入砒霜,意图杀害丈夫,丈夫中毒后呕吐不止且昏迷不醒。此刻,张某想起丈夫平常对自己非常好,顿生悔意,遂将丈夫送到医院进行抢救,最后张某的丈夫获救。张某的行为属于()。
加涅将学习分为智慧技能等五种类型的依据是
编写如下程序:PrivateSubCommand1_Click()DimmAsInteger,nAsIntegerm=2:n=1SelectCasemCase
Earth:MeltingintheHeat?Glaciersaremelting;theicecapsaredisappearingintotheoceans;sealevelsmayrisebymany
最新回复
(
0
)