2. 考研
  3. American mythology loves nothing more than the reluctant hero: the man whose natural talents have destined him for more than obl

American mythology loves nothing more than the reluctant hero: the man whose natural talents have destined him for more than obl

admin2019-04-19  53
问题    American mythology loves nothing more than the reluctant hero: the man whose natural talents have destined him for more than obliging obscurity. George Washington, we are told, was a leader who would have preferred to have been a farmer. Thomas Jefferson, a writer. Martin Luther King, Jr., a preacher. These men were roused from lives of perfunctory achievement, our legends have it, not because they chose their own exceptionalism, but because we, the people, chose it for them. We—seeing greatness in them that they were too humble to observe themselves—conferred on them uncommon paths. Historical circumstance became its own call of duty, and the logic of democracy proved itself through the answer.
   Neil Armstrong was a hero of this stripe: constitutionally humble, circumstantially noble. Nearly every obituary written for him this weekend has made a point of emphasizing his sense of privacy, his sense of humility, his sense of the ironic ordinary. And yet every aspect of Armstrong’s life made clear: On that day in 1969, he acted on our behalf, out of a sense of mission that was communal rather than personal. The reluctant hero is also the self-sacrificing hero.
   And so Armstrong was an icon fit for America’s particular predilections: one who made history, yet one who recognized the ultimate contingency of his own history-making. One who, Washington-like, preferred quiet retirement over continued fame. "Nothing is more typical of Armstrong, or more estimable," Anthony Lane put it, " than his decision not to go into politics: heaven knows what the blandishments, or the invitations, must have been. And Armstrong, by dint of being the first man to tread not upon terra firma but upon the gray dust of terra incognita, rose above the fray and stayed there."
   And so Armstrong’s loss is not merely a loss for all the obvious reasons, but also because it signals a small shift in American mythology. If Armstrong’s was the age of the reluctant hero,ours is the age of adamant heroism. Our icons strive and struggle and seek. Our familiar figures are people who, whether or not their talents entitle them to it, explicitly sought their own fame.
   That is largely to the good. It means a democratic culture, a culture where systematized notions of merit—based on race, based on class—dissolve into the broader cultural will. But it also means a shift in how we see success and ourselves as seekers of it. The tension Armstrong embodied so succinctly— publicity on the one hand, humility on the other—is dissipating. The humility factor is dissolving into a culture that often equates fame with power. Our current icons are less the people who have been called to duty, and more the people who have battled their way into it—the subjects, rather than the predicates, of their own greatness. The reluctant hero is diminishing. Armstrong’s passing signals an end to that myth.
Which of the following statements can best describe our current icons?
选项 A、Our icons are in the age of the reluctant hero.
B、The heroes produce their times.
C、Our icons are entitled to seek.
D、The times produce their heroes.
答案B
解析 本题是一道细节信息题。根据本题题干中的核心词语“our current icons(我们当前的偶像)”，可迅速地把本题的答案信息来源确定在本文尾段的倒数第三句话。该句“Our current icons are less the people who have been called to duty，and more the people who have battled their way into it一the subjects， rather than the predicates， of their own greatness．”的句义是“我们当前的偶像与其说是被职责召唤，不如说是自己杀出一条血路，他们自己造就了自己的伟大，而不是他们自己的伟大造就了他们”。由此推断，选项B“The heroes produce their times．(英雄造时势。)”应该是本题的正确答案。解答此题时，利用题干中的核心词语进行准确定位是十分关键的，否则就会陷入困惑之中。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/SsnZ777K
0

考研英语一

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)