According to a recent Gallup World Poll, 1.1 billion people, or one-quarter of the earth’s adults, want to move temporarily to a

admin2013-06-26  25

问题     According to a recent Gallup World Poll, 1.1 billion people, or one-quarter of the earth’s adults, want to move temporarily to another country in the hope of finding more profitable work. An additional 630 million people would like to move abroad permanently.
    The global desire to leave home arises from poverty and necessity, but it also grows out of a conviction that such mobility is possible. People who embrace this cosmopolitan outlook assume that individuals can and should be at home anywhere in the world, that they need not be tied to any particular place. This outlook was once a strange and threatening product of the Enlightenment but is now accepted as central to a globalized economy.
    It leads to opportunity and profits, but it also has high psychological costs. In nearly a decade’s research into the emotions and experiences of immigrants and migrants, I’ve discovered that many people who leave home in search of better prospects end up feeling displaced and depressed. But today, explicit discussions of homesickness are rare, for the emotion is typically regarded as an embarrassing impediment to individual progress and prosperity. This silence makes mobility appear deceptively easy.
    Technology also seduces us into thinking that migration is painless. Ads from Skype suggest that "free video calling makes it easy to be together, even when you’re not. " The comforting illusion of connection offered by technology makes moving seem less consequential, since one is always just a mouse click or a phone call away.
    Today’s technologies have failed to defeat homesickness even though studies by the Carnegie Corporation of New York show that immigrants are in closer touch with their families than before. A wealth of studies have documented that other newcomers to America also suffer from high rates of depression, despite constant contact with family.
    It is possible that these new technologies actually heighten feelings of displacement. Maria Elena Rivera, a psychologist in Tepic, Mexico, believes technology may magnify homesickness. Her sister, Carmen, had been living in San Diego for 25 years. With the rise of inexpensive long-distance calling, Carmen was able to phone home with greater frequency. Every Sunday she called Mexico and talked with her family, who routinely gathered for a large meal. Carmen always asked what the family was eating, who was there. Technology increased her contact with her family but also brought a regular reminder that she was not there with them.
    The persistence of homesickness points to the limitations of the cosmopolitan philosophy that undergirds so much of our market and society. The idea that we can and should feel at home anyplace on the globe is based on a woridview that celebrates the solitary, mobile individual and envisions men and women as easily separated from family, from home and from the past. But this vision doesn’t square with our emotions, for our ties to home, although often underestimated, are strong and enduring.  
The point the author tried to make in the last paragraph is that______.

选项 A、human being can live self-reliant and independent of families and friends
B、human being are social animals that can not live in stark isolation
C、human being are usually so nostalgic that they are stuck with the past
D、human being are so deeply attached to home that it’s hard for them to stay away from family

答案D

解析 最后一段作者主要反驳了四海为家主义者的观点。他们认为,人们可以轻而易举地脱离家庭、挥别家人、斩断过去。但是作者认为这种臆想与人类的情感背道而驰。尽管人们总是误以为家人的羁绊无足轻重,但它却浓烈而持久,无法斩断。因此,[A]是四海为家主义者的观点,与作者观点完全相反。[B]表面看起来正确,但是因为没有提到人们对于家庭的依恋这一核心论点,所以也不足以概括最后一段的内容。[C]不是作者要讨论的主要内容。[D]为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/T7d4777K
0

最新回复(0)