Immigration is a sensitive subject at the best of times, and this is not one of them. The economic crisis has destroyed millions

admin2012-11-22  42

问题     Immigration is a sensitive subject at the best of times, and this is not one of them. The economic crisis has destroyed millions of jobs in rich countries, making their governments especially touchy about the impact of immigration on the demand for indigenous labor.
    Such concerns are illogical, because immigration is counter-cyclical. Recession in rich countries has discouraged some would-be incomers from trying their luck. America, for instance, has seen a sharp decline in Mexicans trying to cross its southern border. Immigration to Europe has slowed. Some studies also suggest that increased inflows of migrants are a leading indicator of a pickup in growth.
    Yet governments are often reluctant to leave migration flows to the labor market. In recessions, they tend to take steps to discourage new migrants and even get rid of existing ones. Over the past year the Danish, French and Italian governments have rolled back the Schengen passport-free zone and reintroduced limited border controls. Even Australia and Canada, which pioneered the " points system" to give preference to skilled workers, have cut back on work permits. David Cameron, Britain’s prime minister, has imposed a "migration cap" for those from outside the EU. Countries including Spain, Japan and Denmark have taken this to its logical conclusion, with "pay as you go" schemes, under which migrants get cash handouts to return to their countries of origin.
    Concerns about immigration are understandable, especially at a time when jobs are in such short supply. Polling in both Europe and America suggests that a majority of locals think immigrants do more harm than good and damage locals’ chances in the job market. Evidence that immigration hurts indigenous workers is, however, weak. In seasonal work and construction, cheap foreign labor can depress wages and make it harder for the low-skilled to find work, but the flexibility and willingness of new workers can also boost productivity and encourage innovation.
    Strains on public services can sorely test the patience of locals, especially when budget cuts are making it hard to maintain such services. In Britain, for instance, a contingency fund to help cash-strapped local authorities facing pressure on public services has been scrapped. Yet over time immigrants more than repay the extra short-term burden they impose on education, health and other budgets.
    Immigration is, on the whole, good for economies; and right now, rich countries can do with all the economic help they can get. Rather than sending immigrants home, with their skills, energy, ideas and willingness to work, governments should be encouraging them to come. If they don’t, governments elsewhere will.
The author aims t.o tell us that

选项 A、more migrants will pour into the West and East.
B、there is competition from the East for migrants.
C、governments shouldn’t worry about migrants.
D、the West should be more welcoming to migrants.

答案D

解析 主旨题。本文开篇提到immigration这一主题,指出各国政府对这一问题非常敏感。接着分析各国政府的担心没有必要的原因。第三段指出各国政府在经济危机时排挤移民的措施。接着作者在一定程度上对移民带来的问题表示理解。第五段最后表明长远来看,移民的利大于弊。末段指出移民对经济的好处,呼吁鼓励移民,否则,就会被其他国家抢走。可见,作者的观点是肯定移民的好处,呼吁西方政府大量吸引移民,故D为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/THhK777K
0

最新回复(0)