首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
admin
2011-02-10
76
问题
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more than a decade, a growing band of scientists and journalists has pointed to studies that seem to link exposure to electromagnetic fields with increased risk of leukemia and other malignancies. The implications are unsettling, to say the least, since everyone comes into contact with such fields, which are generated by everything electrical, from power lines and antennas to personal computers and micro-wave ovens. Because evidence on the subject is inconclusive and often contradictory, it has been hard to decide whether concern about the health effects of electricity is legitimate or the worst kind of paranoia.
Now the alarmists have gained some qualified support from the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. In the executive summary of a new scientific review, released in draft form late last week, the EPA has put forward what amounts to the most serious government warning to date. The agency tentatively concludes that scientific evidence "suggests a causal link" between extremely low- frequency electromagnetic fields those having very longwave-lengths--and leukemia, lymphoma and brain cancer. While the report falls short of classifying ELF fields as probable carcinogens, it does identify the common 60-hertz magnetic field as "a possible, but not proven, cause of cancer in humans. "
The report is no reason to panic--or even to lose sleep. If there is a cancer risk, it is a small one. The evidence is still so controversial that the draft stirred a great deal of debate within the Bush Administration, and the EPA released it over strong objections from the Pentagon and the White House. But now no one can deny that the issue must be taken seriously and that much more research is needed.
At the heart of the debate is a simple and well-understood physical phenomenon: When an electric current passes through a wire, it generates an electromagnetic field that exerts forces on surrounding objects. For many years, scientists dismissed any suggestion that such forces might be harmful, primarily because they are so extraordinarily weak. The ELF magnetic field generated by a video terminal measures only a few milligauss, or about one-hundredth the strength of the earth’s own magnetic field. The electric fields surrounding a power line can be as high as 10 kilovolts per meter, but the corresponding field induced in human cells will be only about 1 millivolt per meter. This is far less than the electric fields that the cells themselves generate.
How could such minuscule forces pose a health danger? The consensus used to be that they could not, and for decades scientists concentrated on more powerful kinds of radiation, like X-rays, that pack sufficient wallop to knock electrons out of the molecules that make up the human body. Such "ionizing" radiations have been clearly linked to increased cancer risks and there are regulations to control emissions.
But epidemiological studies, which find statistical associations between sets of data, do not prove cause and effect. Though there is a body of laboratory work showing that exposure to ELF fields can have biological effects on animal tissues, a mechanism by which those effects could lead to cancerous growths has never been found.
The Pentagon is far from persuaded. In a blistering 33-page critique of the EPA report, Air Force scientists charge its authors with having "biased the entire document" toward proving a link. "Our reviewers are convinced that there is no suggestion that (electromagnetic fields) present in the environment induce or promote cancer," the Air Force concludes. "It is astonishing that the EPA would lend its imprimatur on this report. " Then Pentagon’s concern is understandable. There is hardly a unit of the modern military that does not depend on the heavy use of some kind of electronic equipment, from huge ground-based radar towers to the defense systems built into every warship and plane.
The view-point of the EPA is ______.
选项
A、there is casual link between electricity and cancer
B、electricity really affects cancer
C、controversial
D、low frequency electromagnetic field is a possible cause of cancer
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/TkcO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI中级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI中级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
Earthobservationsshouldprovide"valueadded"applicationsfromexistingenvironmentalservices,propertytitleholdersandpr
"We’renotbringinginmillionsofdollars,"saysadirectorofdevelopment."Butwewanttomakesurethedemandistherebefor
Therecentconferenceontheeffectiveuseoftheseasandoceanswasanotherattemptresolvingmajordifferencesamongcountrie
Manyoftheelectricandelectronicproductswepurchaseandconsumetodayarewhatsomeindustrialexpertscall"homogeneousto
AmericanIndianlanguages,whichdifferwidely,tendedtogroupmanyunitsofmeaningintomultisyllabicwords.
Atthebeginningofthetwentiethcentury,NorthAmericansocietyheld,asanideal,theNuclearFamily.Thispresumablyperfect
Watermakesupsome70percentagepointsofthebody,anddrinkingenoughwater—eithertapwaterorexpensivemineralwater—
Theprisoner________thathehadassaultedapoliceman.
TreatmentofParkinson’shasimprovedhugely,butlittleisknownofitscasesandorigins—evendog-owninghasbeen______asa
Inthe1400s,artistsoftencreatedtheirownpigmentsbypulverizingsemipreciousstones.
随机试题
党的纪律是党的生命线,党纪必须严于国法,其根本原因在于中国共产党的()。
男性,35岁,体重60kg,双上肢、躯体、双臀会阴部被硫酸烧伤,伤后20分钟到达医院就诊。此时医生应该立即采取哪种急救措施
正常人血中HCO3ˉ与H2CO3之比为
下列说法中,正确的是()。
在技术建议书的评价中,()所占权重较小。
某电气安装工程公司承包某化工厂电气设备安装工程。该设备主要有能量转换设备、开关设备以及防雷设备。设备安装完毕,经检查,无质量问题。但该化工厂在正常运营一段时间后发生爆炸事故,经调查,属于内部过电压造成,于是化工厂立即采取有效措施,防止事故再次发生。
某企业生产甲、乙、丙、丁四种产品,各种产品在铣床组的台时定额分别为60台时、70台时、80台时、150台时;计划甲、乙、丙、丁四种产品年产量为170台、220台、300台、80台。如果该企业采用代表产品法计算生产能力,这四种产品中的代表产品是()。
下列不属于社会和文化环境的因素是()。
我是一只老狗,已到苟延残喘之年,即将离开这个世界。可是,在这个时刻,我想把我一生中悟出的道理讲出来,希望于狗和人的后代们有益。当然,这是狗的道理。我从很小的时候——也就是还不懂事的时候起,就跟随着主人。我曾经以为,他是大狗的形态,而我是小狗的形态,
设某商品一周的需求量是X,其概率密度为若各周对该商品的需要相互独立.以Uk表示前k周的需求量,求U2和U3的概率密度f2(u)和f3(u);
最新回复
(
0
)