首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
admin
2011-02-10
59
问题
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more than a decade, a growing band of scientists and journalists has pointed to studies that seem to link exposure to electromagnetic fields with increased risk of leukemia and other malignancies. The implications are unsettling, to say the least, since everyone comes into contact with such fields, which are generated by everything electrical, from power lines and antennas to personal computers and micro-wave ovens. Because evidence on the subject is inconclusive and often contradictory, it has been hard to decide whether concern about the health effects of electricity is legitimate or the worst kind of paranoia.
Now the alarmists have gained some qualified support from the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. In the executive summary of a new scientific review, released in draft form late last week, the EPA has put forward what amounts to the most serious government warning to date. The agency tentatively concludes that scientific evidence "suggests a causal link" between extremely low- frequency electromagnetic fields those having very longwave-lengths--and leukemia, lymphoma and brain cancer. While the report falls short of classifying ELF fields as probable carcinogens, it does identify the common 60-hertz magnetic field as "a possible, but not proven, cause of cancer in humans. "
The report is no reason to panic--or even to lose sleep. If there is a cancer risk, it is a small one. The evidence is still so controversial that the draft stirred a great deal of debate within the Bush Administration, and the EPA released it over strong objections from the Pentagon and the White House. But now no one can deny that the issue must be taken seriously and that much more research is needed.
At the heart of the debate is a simple and well-understood physical phenomenon: When an electric current passes through a wire, it generates an electromagnetic field that exerts forces on surrounding objects. For many years, scientists dismissed any suggestion that such forces might be harmful, primarily because they are so extraordinarily weak. The ELF magnetic field generated by a video terminal measures only a few milligauss, or about one-hundredth the strength of the earth’s own magnetic field. The electric fields surrounding a power line can be as high as 10 kilovolts per meter, but the corresponding field induced in human cells will be only about 1 millivolt per meter. This is far less than the electric fields that the cells themselves generate.
How could such minuscule forces pose a health danger? The consensus used to be that they could not, and for decades scientists concentrated on more powerful kinds of radiation, like X-rays, that pack sufficient wallop to knock electrons out of the molecules that make up the human body. Such "ionizing" radiations have been clearly linked to increased cancer risks and there are regulations to control emissions.
But epidemiological studies, which find statistical associations between sets of data, do not prove cause and effect. Though there is a body of laboratory work showing that exposure to ELF fields can have biological effects on animal tissues, a mechanism by which those effects could lead to cancerous growths has never been found.
The Pentagon is far from persuaded. In a blistering 33-page critique of the EPA report, Air Force scientists charge its authors with having "biased the entire document" toward proving a link. "Our reviewers are convinced that there is no suggestion that (electromagnetic fields) present in the environment induce or promote cancer," the Air Force concludes. "It is astonishing that the EPA would lend its imprimatur on this report. " Then Pentagon’s concern is understandable. There is hardly a unit of the modern military that does not depend on the heavy use of some kind of electronic equipment, from huge ground-based radar towers to the defense systems built into every warship and plane.
The view-point of the EPA is ______.
选项
A、there is casual link between electricity and cancer
B、electricity really affects cancer
C、controversial
D、low frequency electromagnetic field is a possible cause of cancer
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/TkcO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI中级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI中级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
Japanandthenewlyindustrializedcountriesarepassinglabor-intensivesectsasgarment-makingovertolessdevelopednations
Modernindustrialsocietygrantslittlestatustooldpeople.Infact,suchasocietyhasasystemofbuilt-inobsolescence.The
Sincetheshipmentconsistsofseasonablegoods,itisimportantthatitis______assoonaspossible.
Inordertoobtaintheneededinformation,youshouldwritesimply,clearly,andconcisely______thereaderwantstoknow.
Atthebeginningofthetwentiethcentury,NorthAmericansocietyheld,asanideal,theNuclearFamily.Thispresumablyperfect
Japanandthenewlyindustrializedcountriesarepassinglabor-intensivesectsasgarment-makingovertolessdevelopednations
TheaffluentmiddleclasscreatedbytheAsianboomnowtakeupoverfromexportsasthemainengineofgrowth.
Averysmallchangeoftemperatureoftheengineindicatesthemakingofaverybigtrouble,andthisisknownbyalmosteverye
Thehumanintelligencethatcreatedindustrialcivilizationnowhastheassignmentofmakingthecivilization______man’sbasicn
Inthe1400s,artistsoftencreatedtheirownpigmentsbypulverizingsemipreciousstones.
随机试题
A.与大肠癌有关B.与宫颈癌有关C.与肝癌有关D.与鼻咽癌有关E.与白血病有关
抑制素对下列哪种腺垂体激素的分泌具有很强的抑制作用
心理健康的表现,不包括()
碾压混凝土的干湿度一般用VC值来表示,VC值太小表示()。
全国各地的电话公司目前开始为消费者提供电子接线员系统,然而,在近期内,人工接线员并不会因此减少。除了下列哪项外.其他各项均有助于解释上述现象?
全党开展主题教育的总要求是守初心,担使命,找差距,抓落实。中国共产党人的初心和使命是()。
若一个管理者是某领域优秀的专家学者,则他一定会管理好公司的基本事务;一位品行端正的管理者可以得到下属的尊重;但是对所有领域都一知半解的人一定不会得到下属的尊重。浩瀚公司董事会只会解除那些没有管理好公司基本事务者的职务。根据以上信息,可以得出以下哪项?
收入分配是民生之源,是改善民生、实现发展成果由人民共享最重要最直接的方式。为了持续增加城乡居民收入,缩小收入差距,实现发展成果由人民共享的目标,必须要进一步深化收入分配制度改革。当前,深化收入分配制度改革,就要
A、Upstairs.B、Downstairs.C、Rightbehindthewoman.D、Acrossthebusstop.A
EndangeredPeoplesA)Today,itisnotdistance,butculturethatseparatesthepeoplesoftheworld.Thecentralquestionofour
最新回复
(
0
)