首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
admin
2011-02-10
56
问题
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more than a decade, a growing band of scientists and journalists has pointed to studies that seem to link exposure to electromagnetic fields with increased risk of leukemia and other malignancies. The implications are unsettling, to say the least, since everyone comes into contact with such fields, which are generated by everything electrical, from power lines and antennas to personal computers and micro-wave ovens. Because evidence on the subject is inconclusive and often contradictory, it has been hard to decide whether concern about the health effects of electricity is legitimate or the worst kind of paranoia.
Now the alarmists have gained some qualified support from the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. In the executive summary of a new scientific review, released in draft form late last week, the EPA has put forward what amounts to the most serious government warning to date. The agency tentatively concludes that scientific evidence "suggests a causal link" between extremely low- frequency electromagnetic fields those having very longwave-lengths--and leukemia, lymphoma and brain cancer. While the report falls short of classifying ELF fields as probable carcinogens, it does identify the common 60-hertz magnetic field as "a possible, but not proven, cause of cancer in humans. "
The report is no reason to panic--or even to lose sleep. If there is a cancer risk, it is a small one. The evidence is still so controversial that the draft stirred a great deal of debate within the Bush Administration, and the EPA released it over strong objections from the Pentagon and the White House. But now no one can deny that the issue must be taken seriously and that much more research is needed.
At the heart of the debate is a simple and well-understood physical phenomenon: When an electric current passes through a wire, it generates an electromagnetic field that exerts forces on surrounding objects. For many years, scientists dismissed any suggestion that such forces might be harmful, primarily because they are so extraordinarily weak. The ELF magnetic field generated by a video terminal measures only a few milligauss, or about one-hundredth the strength of the earth’s own magnetic field. The electric fields surrounding a power line can be as high as 10 kilovolts per meter, but the corresponding field induced in human cells will be only about 1 millivolt per meter. This is far less than the electric fields that the cells themselves generate.
How could such minuscule forces pose a health danger? The consensus used to be that they could not, and for decades scientists concentrated on more powerful kinds of radiation, like X-rays, that pack sufficient wallop to knock electrons out of the molecules that make up the human body. Such "ionizing" radiations have been clearly linked to increased cancer risks and there are regulations to control emissions.
But epidemiological studies, which find statistical associations between sets of data, do not prove cause and effect. Though there is a body of laboratory work showing that exposure to ELF fields can have biological effects on animal tissues, a mechanism by which those effects could lead to cancerous growths has never been found.
The Pentagon is far from persuaded. In a blistering 33-page critique of the EPA report, Air Force scientists charge its authors with having "biased the entire document" toward proving a link. "Our reviewers are convinced that there is no suggestion that (electromagnetic fields) present in the environment induce or promote cancer," the Air Force concludes. "It is astonishing that the EPA would lend its imprimatur on this report. " Then Pentagon’s concern is understandable. There is hardly a unit of the modern military that does not depend on the heavy use of some kind of electronic equipment, from huge ground-based radar towers to the defense systems built into every warship and plane.
The view-point of the EPA is ______.
选项
A、there is casual link between electricity and cancer
B、electricity really affects cancer
C、controversial
D、low frequency electromagnetic field is a possible cause of cancer
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/TkcO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI中级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI中级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
Weshouldletmoreyoungparentsandtheirchildrencanenjoyscientificearlyeducation.
Followingayearoffastdevelopment,bythefirstquarterofthisyear,Chinahashadabout1,100e-commercewebsites.
"We’renotbringinginmillionsofdollars,"saysadirectorofdevelopment."Butwewanttomakesurethedemandistherebefor
Manyoftheelectricandelectronicproductswepurchaseandconsumetodayarewhatsomeindustrialexpertscall"homogeneousto
Theprisoner______thathehadassaultedapoliceman.
Modernindustrialsocietygrantslittlestatustooldpeople.Infact,suchasocietyhasasystemofbuilt-inobsolescence.The
Sincetheshipmentconsistsofseasonablegoods,itisimportantthatitis______assoonaspossible.
Atthebeginningofthetwentiethcentury,NorthAmericansocietyheld,asanideal,theNuclearFamily.Thispresumablyperfect
Japanandthenewlyindustrializedcountriesarepassinglabor-intensivesectsasgarment-makingovertolessdevelopednations
AdiscoveryinNewJerseyactuallycontributedtotheearlyeconomicdevelopmentoftheU.S.and,in1714aworkeruncoveredag
随机试题
局限期的上颌窦癌较合理的照射野布野方法为
克罗恩病最常见的并发症是()。
《会计法》中所讲的“会计主管人员”是负责组织管理会计实务、行使会计机构负责人职权的负责人。()
下列关于特殊的普通合伙企业的说法中,正确的有()。(2013年)
认同是在思想、情感、态度和行为上主动接受他人的影响,使自己的态度和行为()
最近一期的《瞭望新闻周刊》有文章称“消费就是爱国”,有关专家撰文加以嘲笑:我从来没有想到________的生活方式,居然会成为一种道德瑕疵。填入划横线部分最恰当的一项是()。
人在遇到危险的时候会爆发出比平时更大的力量和产生跟敏捷的反应,比如测定激素水平,明显提高的是()。
根据下列资料,回答问题。2013年1—10月份,全国规模以上工业企业实现利润总额46263.2亿元,比上年同期增长13.7%,增速比。1—9月份提高0.2个百分点,其中,主营活动利润46884.2亿元,比上年同期增长5.4%,增速比1—9月份提高
【B1】【B4】
只有每年训练兵团毕业生的前10名或驻扎兵团中经验丰富的士兵才能成为宪兵团成员,驻守在城墙内仅负责管理人民和维持秩序。所有驻扎兵团同样驻守在城墙内仅负责修理、维护和强化城墙。调查兵团并不驻扎在城墙内,仅负责城墙外的搜索和调查行动。训练兵团中的人员并非正式士兵
最新回复
(
0
)