首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
In the idealized version of how science is done, facts about the world are waiting to be observed and collected by objective res
In the idealized version of how science is done, facts about the world are waiting to be observed and collected by objective res
admin
2021-01-06
45
问题
In the idealized version of how science is done, facts about the world are waiting to be observed and collected by objective researchers who use the scientific method to carry out their work. But in the everyday practice of science, discovery frequently follows an ambiguous and complicated route. We aim to be objective, but we cannot escape the context of our unique life experience. Prior knowledge and interest influence what we experience, what we think our experiences mean, and the subsequent actions we take. Opportunities for misinterpretation, error, and self-deception abound.
Consequently, discovery claims should be thought of as protoscience. Similar to newly staked mining claims, they are full of potential. But it takes collective scrutiny and acceptance to transform a discovery claim into a mature discovery. This is the credibility process, through which the individual researcher’s me, here, now becomes the community’s anyone, anywhere, anytime. Objective knowledge is the goal, not the starting point.
Once a discovery claim becomes public, the discoverer receives intellectual credit. But, unlike with mining claims, the community takes control of what happens next. Within the complex social structure of the scientific community, researchers make discoveries; editors and reviewers act as gatekeepers by controlling the publication process; other scientists use the new finding to suit their own purposes; and finally, the public (including other scientists) receives the new discovery and possibly accompanying technology. As a discovery claim works its way through the community, the interaction and confrontation between shared and competing beliefs about the science and the technology involved transforms an individual’s discovery claim into the community’s credible discovery.
Two paradoxes exist throughout this credibility process. First, scientific work tends to focus on some aspect of prevailing knowledge that is viewed as incomplete or incorrect. Little reward accompanies duplication and confirmation of what is already known and believed. The goal is new-search, not re-search. Not surprisingly, newly published discovery claims and credible discoveries that appear to be important and convincing will always be open to challenge and potential modification or refutation by future researchers. Second, novelty itself frequently provokes disbelief. Nobel Laureate and physiologist Albert Szent-Gyorgyi once described discovery as "seeing what everybody has seen and thinking what nobody has thought. " But thinking what nobody else has thought and telling others what they have missed may not change their views. Sometimes years are required for truly novel discovery claims to be accepted and appreciated.
In the end, credibility "happens" to a discovery claim—a process that corresponds to what philosopher Annette Baier has described as the commons of the mind. "We reason together, challenge, revise, and complete each other’s reasoning and each other’s conceptions of reason. "
Albert Szent-Gyorgyi would most likely agree that______.
选项
A、scientific claims will survive challenges
B、discoveries today inspire future research
C、efforts to make discoveries are justified
D、scientific work calls for a critical mind
答案
D
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/Tt1Z777K
0
考研英语一
相关试题推荐
Ifitwereonlynecessarytodecidewhethertoteachelementarysciencetoeveryoneonamassbasisortofindthegiftedfewan
Ifitwereonlynecessarytodecidewhethertoteachelementarysciencetoeveryoneonamassbasisortofindthegiftedfewan
Ifitwereonlynecessarytodecidewhethertoteachelementarysciencetoeveryoneonamassbasisortofindthegiftedfewan
Ifitwereonlynecessarytodecidewhethertoteachelementarysciencetoeveryoneonamassbasisortofindthegiftedfewan
Ifitwereonlynecessarytodecidewhethertoteachelementarysciencetoeveryoneonamassbasisortofindthegiftedfewan
Ifitwereonlynecessarytodecidewhethertoteachelementarysciencetoeveryoneonamassbasisortofindthegiftedfewan
随机试题
患者男,35岁,体重70kg,因左耳缓慢进行性听力下降就诊于耳科门诊。诉耳鸣,走路不稳感,既往儿时有左耳流脓史1年。下列检查中合适的是
患者张某,男性,18岁,面部危险三角区感染化脓,护士告知患者此部位忌用热敷,其主要原因是
下列哪种情况容易产生三凹征
不属于应收账款对于企业的影响的是( )。
根据产品质量法的规定,《产品质量法》所指缺陷,是指()。
某试验的结果如表1.1—1所示,假定事件互不相容。若记事件A=(b,c,d,e),B=(a,d,e),则P(A—B)为()。
上海贝尔公司始终把员工看成公司的宝贵资产,并为拥有一支高素质的员工队伍而自豪。公司每年召开的董事会,都有相当多的时间用于专题讨论员工培训计划、奖金分配方案、工资调整和其他福利政策等问题。上海贝尔公司把以人为本的经营方略体现在了公司的福利政策上。(
2005年全国房地产开发完成投资()2006年12月新建商品住房销售价格与上月比涨幅在福州前面的主要城市是()
中国古代法律中有关于“公罪”的规定,“公罪”指的是官员在执行职务的过程中由于疏忽大意、过于自信等主观过失以及才力不及造成负面后果的犯罪行为。根据上述定义,下列属于古代法律中“公罪”的情形是()。
楚有祠者,赐其舍人卮酒。舍人相谓曰:“数人饮之不足,一人饮之有余。请画地为蛇,先成者饮酒。”一人蛇先成,引酒且饮之,乃左手持卮,右手画蛇曰:“吾能为之足。”未成,一人之蛇成,夺其卮曰:“蛇固无足,子安能为之足?”遂饮其酒。为蛇足者,终亡其酒。
最新回复
(
0
)