首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
The Choice Myth Last week, The Washington Post ran a front-page story that said most stay-at-home moms aren’t SUV-driving, d
The Choice Myth Last week, The Washington Post ran a front-page story that said most stay-at-home moms aren’t SUV-driving, d
admin
2011-01-01
58
问题
The Choice Myth
Last week, The Washington Post ran a front-page story that said most stay-at-home moms aren’t SUV-driving, daily yoga-doing, latte-drinking white, upper-middle-class women who choose to leave their high-powered careers to answer the call to motherhood. Instead, they are disproportionately low-income, non-college educated, young and foreign-born; in other words, they are women whose horizons are greatly limited and for whom the cost of child care, very often, makes work not a workable choice at all.
These findings, drawn from a new report by the Census Bureau, really ought to lead us to reframe our public conversations about who mothers are and why they do what they do. It should lead us away from all the moralistic bombast(大话) about mothers’ "choices" and "priorities". It should get us thinking less about choice, in fact, and make us focus more on the objective conditions that drive women’s lives. And they should drive us to think about the choices that we as a society must make to guarantee that the best possible opportunities are available for all families.
The basic finding of this latest report—that the more choices mothers have, the more likely they are to work—has been known, to anyone who’s taken the time to seriously look into the issue, for quite some time now. Ever since 2003, when Lisa Belkin’s article in The Times Magazine about highly privileged and ultra-high-achieving moms—"The Opt-Out Revolution" —was generalized by the news media to claim that mothers overall were choosing to leave the work force in droves, researchers have been revisiting the state of mothers employment and reaching very similar conclusions.
In 2005, the Motherhood Project at the Institute for American Values surveyed more than 2,000 women and published a report that said most mothers, given free choice in an ideal world, would choose to be employed—provided their employment didn’t impinge (侵占) excessively on their time with their kids. Approximately two-thirds said they’d ideally work part time or from home; only 16 percent said they’d prefer to work full-time. (Interestingly, the researchers said, it was the least-educated mothers who expressed the strongest preference for full-time work.)
In 2007, the sociologists David Cotter, Paula England and Joan Hermsen looked carefully at four decades of employment data and found that women with choices—those with college educations—were overwhelmingly choosing to stay in the work force. The only women "opting out" in any significant numbers were the very richest—those with husbands earning more than $125,000 a year—and the very poorest—those with husbands earning less than $23,400 a year.
You might say that the movement of the richest women out of the workforce proves that women will, in the best of all possible worlds, go home. But these women often have husbands who, in order to earn those top salaries, work 70 or 80 hours a week and travel extensively; someone has to he home. Many left high-powered careers that made similar demands on their time. They are privileged, it’s true, but very often they have also been cornered by the all-or-nothing non-choices of our workplaces.
The alternative narrative—of constricted horizons, not choice—that might have emerged from recent research has never really made it into the mainstream. It just can’t, it seems, find a foothold.
"The reason we keep getting this narrative is that there is this deep cultural conflict about mothers’ employment," England told me this week. "On the one hand, people believe women should have equal opportunities, but on the other hand, we don’t envision(展望) men taking on more child care and housework and, unlike Europe, we don’t seem to be able to envision family-friendly work policies. "
Why this matters—and why opening this topic up for discussion is important—is very clear: because our public policy continues to rest upon a fictitious idea, eternally recycled in the media, of mothers’ free choices, and not upon the constraints that truly drive their behavior. "If journalism repeatedly frames the wrong problem, then the folks who make public policy may very well deliver the wrong solution," is how E. J. Graff, the associate director and senior researcher at Brandeis University’s Schuster Institute for Investigative Journalism once put it in the Columbia Journalism Review. "If women are happily choosing to stay home with their babies, that’s a private decision. But... it’s a public policy issue if schools, jobs and other American institutions are structured in ways that make it frustratingly difficult, and sometimes impossible, for parents to manage both their jobs and family responsibilities."
It looked, not so long ago, as though things were going to change. Barack Obama made increasing women’s work/life choices and providing more supports for working families a cornerstone of his campaign. All those lofty ideals, though, seem to have been forgotten in the realities of this recession, where plans to expand universal pre-K, paid family leave and subsidies for child care have gone the way of" state budget revenues. Even workfare, The Times reported this week, is being discarded in California in favor of old-style no-work welfare, because it’s been deemed too costly to give poor mothers job skills while providing decent child care.
In Fresno County, one of the first places in California where welfare recipients are being told about the policy change, which is voluntary for now, the new regulations aren’t being viewed as good news.
"Especially when you have kids, you can’t just sit around and collect checks," one mother told The Times. For now, 90 percent of beneficiaries in Fresno County are choosing to keep working and receiving child care subsidies.
When mothers can choose, they choose self-empowerment (自助自强). Because they know that there is no true difference between their advancement and the advancement of their children. Why do we so enduringly deny them the dignity of choice?
In Fresno County, the majority of beneficiaries are receiving child care subsidies while ______.
选项
答案
keeping working
解析
根据题干关键词Fresno County,beneficiaries定位到原文倒数第二段最后一句:For now, 90 percent of beneficiaries in Fresno County are choosing to keep working and receiving child care subsidies. 可知在Fresno郡,大部分的受益人在接受儿童抚养资助的同时继续工作。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/U5y7777K
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
Whenyoungpeoplegettheirrealjobs,theymayfacealotofnew,【B1】______situations.Theymayfindthateverythingisdiffere
OceanadventurerPeterBlaketaughtlessonseveryleadershouldknow—FullSteamAheadRocketingth
OceanadventurerPeterBlaketaughtlessonseveryleadershouldknow—FullSteamAheadRocketingth
YouAreWhatYouThinkDoyouseetheglassashalf-fullratherthanhalf-empty?Doyoukeepyoureyeuponthedough-nut(油
Therearetwotypesof’peopleintheworld.Althoughtheyhave【B1】______degreesofhealthandwealthandothercomfortsof
Smallbusinessownersmostaccepttheburdensofentrepreneurship(企业家的职责).Beinginbusinessforyourselfrequiresyourfullatt
A、telephonethem.B、buythemagift.C、nothing,justgoover.D、sendthemaninvitation.A此题考查听细节的能力。抓住关键词beforevisiting,在听的时候
A、Sheacceptedtheman’sinvitation.B、Shehasfinishedherpaper.C、Shedeclinedtheman’sinvitation.D、Shehasjustgraduated
A、War.B、Providingservices.C、Naturaldisasters.D、Providingblood.A细节题。浏览选项可知,选项为名词和动名词短语,可能考查细节。红十字会成立的原因,也即杜南为什么会产生成立这样一个组织
A、Acaseofbankrobbery.B、ThesearchforthereliablewitnessC、Theinterviewwiththebankclerk.D、Theterrificdetectivest
随机试题
寻常型天疱疮的病因是
A病起发热,或热后突然出现肢体软弱无力B四肢痿软,身体困重C肢体痿软无力,逐渐加重,神疲乏力D突然昏仆,半身活动不利E起病缓慢,下肢痿软无力,腰脊酸软脾胃亏虚,精微不运型见症为
关于子宫的解剖,下述哪项正确
【背景资料】某工程建设项目,建设单位为北京市F置业投资有限公司,施工总承包单位为H市第三工程建设有限公司,监理单位为Z建筑科学研究咨询有限公司。施工总承包合同金额为3亿元。该项目为两栋商业办公楼,主楼地上22层,地下3层,辅楼地上12层,地下1层,总建筑面
下列工程质量控制工作中,属于“PDCA”处理环节的是()。
【背景资料】因板材价格不断上涨因素,某铜厂决定扩大生产,准备进行二期工程扩建。二期工程占地约。1000亩,主要包括:厂区道路、污水和雨排水管道、供电系统、冷轧车间、镀锌车间、彩涂车间等能源车间以及机修、仓库、办公设施。冷轧车间属于大型工业厂房,厂房内有酸
下列筹资方式中,既可以筹集长期资金,也可以融通短期资金的是()。
通信卫星上的全球波束天线的方向图是三维全向的球面。()
Hecouldhavetolduswhathadhappened,buthedidnot______to.
IntheUnitedStates,olderpeoplerarelylivewiththeftadultchildren,Butinmanyothercultureschildrenareexpectedtoca
最新回复
(
0
)