首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Character Analysis of Shakespearean Plays I. Character analysis —character evaluation as the best way to start the analysis of
Character Analysis of Shakespearean Plays I. Character analysis —character evaluation as the best way to start the analysis of
admin
2015-07-27
33
问题
Character Analysis of Shakespearean Plays
I. Character analysis
—character evaluation as the best way to start the analysis
of a Shakespearean play —characters in a typical 【B1】______ doing particular things in 【B1】______
every play
—conflicts involved characters
—characters being on trial
II. Three main reasons for approaching Shakespearean plays
by analyzing characters
A. Plays with active characters like people around us
—the appeal of the genre
—seeing the play as 【B2】______ itself 【B2】______
B. Shakespeare’s ability to 【B3】______ characters 【B3】______
—individual personality with experience requiring an
evaluation
—individual actors’ need to 【B4】______ upon the motivations 【B4】______
for their characters
C. The play including 【B5】______ itself, for the reason that 【B5】______
characters are trying to understand their own characters
III. The merits and weaknesses of the approach illustrated
by 【B6】______ interpretations of 19th century 【B6】______
A. Values
—always reminding of the central concern — 【B7】______ 【B7】______
—keeping in touch with the reason why Shakespeare 【B8】______ 【B8】______
B. Problems
—not enough 【B9】______ about characters: 【B9】______
1) key elements full character analysis needs are 【B10】______ 【B10】______
2) for the lack of evidence, the analysis often ends with
trivial matters.
【B2】
Character Analysis of Shakespearean Plays
Good morning, everyone. Last time I just gave a brief introduction to the Shakespearean play, today we will go further to discuss together how to understand a Shakespearean play. The most obvious way to begin an interpretation of a Shakespearean play is by evaluating the characters. [1] Any play involves characters in a particular setting, doing particular things. The plot will develop a conflict, which will usually inflict pain or distress on some people, and will lead to a final resolution of sorts in which some characters may die or be punished severely, while others survive or triumph or get substantially rewarded. Hence, one clear entry into such a work is to put the characters on trial: Who is good? Who is bad? Why do certain people act in certain ways? Do any of the characters change? Where are my sympathies as I make my way through this play? As an interpreter, I am, in essence, the judge, and how shall I apportion my verdicts?
Interpreting a play by analyzing the characters in it, judging them, and coming to some final evaluation of them is a natural way to approach Shakespeare for three main reasons. The first is that these are plays, and they inevitably feature active characters more or less recognizably like people around us. That, indeed, is the chief appeal of the genre. [2] So it is entirely natural to treat the play as we treat life itself, by responding to the people we see, the actions they carry out, the words they use, and the decisions they make. On the basis of these observations we will come to some conclusions about the characters and will discuss the play in those terms.
[3] The second reason is that Shakespeare is famous, more than anyone else, for his astonishing ability to create interesting, complex, and natural characters. Unlike many other dramatists whose characters do not invite very complex investigation, Shakespeare has the ability to fill a play with scores of characters, each of whom talks in a language and acts in a way which indicates a sharply focused individual personality with a very particular response to experience. Hence, it is, once again, natural to treat them as fully realized people whose conduct requires an evaluative judgment.
Then, too, the fact that we are dealing with plays always keeps the approach through character analysis alive,[4] because theatre productions depend upon individual actors, and individual actors need to reflect upon the motivations for their characters. They have to, in a sense, discover their human qualities and become the stage people whose lives they enact. Thus, the dramatic tradition of continuing to mount Shakespeare productions ensures that the analysis of character will remain a powerful force in the interpretation of the plays.
The third major reason why character analysis is an important approach to Shakespeare’s plays is (as Harold Bloom has repeatedly pointed out) that Shakespeare’s characters are often intrigued or puzzled by their own characters. That is, they make their characters part of the dramatic "problem" of the fiction we are exploring. When, for example, Hamlet or Macbeth or Othello starts to wrestle with his own character, trying to understand his own motivation, feelings, and actions, that moment places the nature of the character as an essential element in the work (in a way that is markedly different from texts in which a character’s personality does not create particular problems for him). [5] In other words, the plays themselves put character analysis directly on the table.
The approach to a Shakespeare play which places the analysis of character at the centre of the process was particularly strong in the nineteenth century, [6] and the literary interpretations from that period often illustrate the strengths and weaknesses of that approach. [7] The great value of character analysis is that it always reminds us that, whatever else we may want to talk of, the central concern is particular human beings. Whatever else King Lear is about, it is centrally about a suffering old man, whose unique character brings upon him almost unimaginable suffering. Whatever we make of Hamlet, we cannot forget that the people in the play drive Ophelia insane and lead her to suicide, and that she is an innocent and loving young woman. [8] Focusing upon the characters in the play always keeps us in touch with a major reason why Shakespeare matters — his works constantly illuminate human nature in all sorts of moving ways.
That said, however, treating the interpretation of a play as primarily a matter of evaluating character can create problems. [9] One major problem, of course, is that in many instances we do not know enough about a character to arrive at a sufficiently full understanding of his or her personality. We know almost nothing of Hamlet’s childhood, or Bolingbroke’s inner thoughts, or Lady Macbeth’s sexuality. [10] Thus, key elements required in any lull character analysis are missing. Of course, we can speculate on such matters, but such speculations can often end up in inconclusive and often trivial debates, because there is not enough evidence. So we can find criticism by the analysis of character degenerating into explorations of the girlhood of Shakespeare’s heroines, endless arguments about whether or not the Macbeths had any children, how old Hamlet might be or whether he is really insane or not, whether Falstaff is a coward or not, how black Othello really is, or what Antony and Cleopatra really talk about when they are alone together. Shakespearean plays are great inheritance as well as wealth for the humankind. The characters in his plays give us lots of insights to know and to talk with Shakespeare’s soul. I hope my lecture has led you on the way to the thought of this great player. Thank you for listening.
选项
答案
life
解析
对戏剧进行人物分析的第一个原因就是这些人物就像生活在我们身边的人。因此it is entirely natural to treat the play aswe treat life itself(很自然,我们看待戏剧就像看待人生一样),本题答案为life。注意其中的treat…as同义替换成题干中的see...as。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/UMOO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Systematiceffortsatnationalnutritionplanningindevelopingcountriesgobackbarelyadecade.Duringthatbrieftimethere
Accordingtolegend,theancientOlympicGameswerefoundedbyHeracles,asonofZeus.YetthefirstOlympicGamesforwhich
WhichofthefollowingpartiesrepresentsthemostinterestsofQuebec?
WhichofthefollowingisNOTamongShakespeare’sfourgreattragedies?
Insixteenth-centuryItalyandeighteenth-centuryFrance,waningprosperityandincreasingsocialunrestledtherulingfamilie
Everyculturehasacceptedstandardswhenitcomestopersonalhygiene.ForeignvisitorsshouldthereforebeawareofwhatAmer
Inmanystates,budgetrequestsbystateuniversitieshavehadtobescaledbackorfrozen,whiletuition,theshareofthecos
Thereare______morphemesintheword"boyish".
离我们不远站着的一位中年绅士也在眺望远景,他也是中国人,听我儿子讲得挺带劲,就非常自然地与儿子攀谈起来,饶有兴致地论及阿拉斯加在美国版图上所处位置的特殊性,因为该州与美国本土根本不搭界,它一边与俄罗斯的白令海峡相互对望,一边与加拿大毗邻,那地方原属沙俄领土
随机试题
甲,17周岁,将派出所民警乙的儿子打致轻伤,乙侦办此案。甲及其父母有权要求乙回避。
发于躯干部的丹毒称为()
反映货币资金业务的原始凭证具有的特点有()
A.右房、右室大B.左室、右室大,左房、右房大C.左房、左室大D.左室、右室大E.右室大动脉导管未闭超声心动图可见
对所有高脂血症患者,首要的、基本的,并需长期坚持的治疗措施应该为()
属于投标人应具备的条件的是( )。
深圳华富进出口公司(440393xxxx,该企业1年内有3次以上违反海关监管规定行为)从境外购进一批黄铜,料件进口前,该企业已向海关办妥加工贸易合同登记备案手续。料件进口后委托广东佛山佳盛电子厂(440636xxxx,加工贸易B类管理企业)加工生产出口芯片
王某现年17岁,高二学生,平时创新能力极强,其研究创造的一个小发明获得专利,并且经济价值较高。专利权的申请、使用和由此所获取的收入的处理一概由王某的父亲予以安排,王某的父亲从事的下列各种行为中,违背了《民法通则》规定的监护责任的是()。
甲、乙、丙、丁、戊合购了一套住房,并约定为按份共有,则下列表述正确的是()。
A、Thereductionofhighwaytollfeesonpassengercars.B、Thedecreaseinthenumberofprivatecars.C、Passengers’newholiday
最新回复
(
0
)