首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
admin
2009-02-10
59
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. A Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchman acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads— against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness toward individuals.
What must have happened after the fire case was settled in court?
选项
A、The railroad compensated for the damage to the immediate buildings.
B、The railroad compensated for all the damage by the fire.
C、The railroad paid nothing for the damaged buildings.
D、The railroad worker paid for the property damage himself.
答案
A
解析
本题的相关信息在文章第四段。陪审团认为铁道公司应对火灾造成的损失负责,而法庭推翻了陪审团的意见,认为铁道公司仅对与火灾发生处临近的建筑的损失负责,其他损失与铁道公司无关。因此,审判结果极有可能就是铁道公司只需赔偿与火灾发生处临近的建筑的损失费用。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/UQ6K777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
Massmediaismediathatisintendedforalargeaudience.Itmaytaketheformofbroadcastmedia,asincaseoftelevisionan
Theabilitytocommunicateistheprimaryfactorthatdistinguisheshumanbeingsfromanimals.Anditistheabilitytocommunic
TheMessagesinDistanceI.Peoplefromdifferentcultures【T1】______differently【T1】______A.NorthAmericansstandabouttwof
Populationageingandtheresultingpressuresonexistingpensionsystemsconstitutesoneofthemostimportantchallengesmode
Excessivecaloriesfromsugarcancontributetoweightproblems,andsugarisalsowellknownforitsabilitytopromoteteethd
Excessivecaloriesfromsugarcancontributetoweightproblems,andsugarisalsowellknownforitsabilitytopromoteteethd
Intoday’scompetitiveworldwhenparentsarebusyaccomplishingtheircareergoals,moreandmorechildrenarebeingbroughtup
(1)Toooften,investorsfocusonfiguresthatsupposedlyofferinsightintoacompany’sperformancewithoutsheddinglightonho
"Almostuniversally,womenhavefailedtoreachleadingpositionsinmajorcorporationsandprivatesectororganizations,resp
Thelittleboycameintotheroomafterplayingfootballfor2hours,hisface______withsweat.
随机试题
血源性肺脓肿最常见的病原菌为
深化农村信用社改革试点工作中,国家对农村信用社给予的扶持政策主要有______、______、税收优惠和利率政策。
下列何种处理方式不影响CT图像的部分容积效应
颌面部无菌创口一般的处理原则是
五元学说万物产生和存在的基础是()。
A.6年B.10年C.20年D.无时间限制医药未披露数据保护的期限为()
()是指国有建设用地使用权出让人和受让人之间就出让国有建设用地使用权及如何行使建设用地使用权等问题所达成的明确相互间权利和义务关系的协议。
下列各项因素中,注册会计师在确定审计工作底稿的要素和范围时通常无需考虑的是()。
下图表示我国南方地区和北方地区土地面积、水资源总量、人口、耕地等指标的对比。读图回答问题。北方地区资源的配置现状会导致()。
“(科举制)西国莫不慕之,近代渐设考试以取人才,而为学优则仕之举。今英、法、美均已见端,将来必至推广。”该材料反映科举制()
最新回复
(
0
)