首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
The Commission is expected to propose allowing people to choose which legal jurisdiction they would come under, based on their (
The Commission is expected to propose allowing people to choose which legal jurisdiction they would come under, based on their (
admin
2011-01-10
73
问题
The Commission is expected to propose allowing people to choose which legal jurisdiction they would come under, based on their (1) or their residency. But the proposal is set to (2) because of the very different laws on divorce that apply across the EU. The Commission wants to (3) problems over which law to apply when, for example, a married couple from one member state is (4) in another member state or when the couple is of different EU nationalities.
The (5) of member states are said to be (6) the idea and responded positively to a (6) which followed the (8) of a Commission Green Paper. With 15 percent of German divorces each year involving couples of different nationalities, the government of Berlin (9) see resolved the issue of which laws should apply.
But some member states are expected to resist the (10) which would involve allowing different divorce laws to be applied in their countries. For example, in Ireland where the divorce law states a couple must have been separated for four years, establish that their marriage has broken down and be offered (11) , a couple from Sweden could apply to an Irish court to allow them to divorce under Swedish law, where divorce can be (12) quickly.
The Irish government’s (13) to the Commission on the Green Paper stated: "Ireland is not in favor of allowing (14) to choose the applicable law, as this could be open to abuse.., such abuse would be likely to (15) most on divorce regimes, such as that of Ireland, which require a relatively long separation period." Ireland, like the UK, however, is allowed to choose whether to "opt-in" to such a proposal under rules agreed in the Amsterdam treaty. Malta has no such (16) but could (17) the proposal in the Council of Ministers since (18) approval will be required.
"It is going to lead to (19) ," said Geoffrey Shannon, Irish expert on the Commission on European Family Law, which examines the (20) of EU family law.
The proposal would also mean that judges would have to be trained in the divorce law of all 25 member states.
The Commission is expected to propose allowing people to choose which legal jurisdiction they would come under, based on their nationalities or their residency. But the proposal is set to run into difficulties because of the very different laws on divorce that apply across the EU.
The Commission wants to clear up problems over which law to apply when, for example, a married couple from one member state is resident in another member state or when the couple is of different EU nationalities.
The majority of member states are said to be in favor of the idea and responded positively to a consultation which followed the publication of a Commission Green Paper. With 15 percent of German divorces each year involving couples of different nationalities, the government of Berlin is particularly keen to see resolved the issue of which laws should apply.
But some member states are expected to resist the proposal which would involve allowing different divorce laws to be applied in their countries. For example, in Ireland where the divorce law states a couple must have been separated for four years, establish that their marriage has broken down and be offered mediation, a couple from Sweden could apply to an Irish court to allow them to divorce under Swedish law, where divorce can be obtained quickly.
The Irish government’s submission to the Commission on the Green Paper stated, "Ireland is not in favor of allowing spouses to choose the applicable law, as this could be open to abuse.., such abuse would be likely to impact most on divorce regimes, such as that of Ireland, which require a relatively long separation period."
Ireland, like the UK, however, is allowed to choose whether to "opt-in" to such a proposal under rules agreed in the Amsterdam treaty. Malta has no such safeguard but could veto the proposal in the Council of Ministers since unanimous approval will be required.
"It is going to lead to a two-tier situation," said Geoffrey Shannon, Irish expert on the Commission on European Family Law, which examines the harmonization of EU family law.
The proposal would also mean that judges would have to be trained in the divorce law of all 25 member states.
选项
答案
obtained
解析
动词。本题考查动词和名词的搭配。与名词divorce搭配的动词应为obtain。此处注意该动词使用被动形式。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/UcuO777K
本试题收录于:
CATTI三级口译综合能力题库翻译专业资格(CATTI)分类
0
CATTI三级口译综合能力
翻译专业资格(CATTI)
相关试题推荐
Theirhostcarved,poured,served,cutbread,talked,laughed,proposedhealth.
Alibaba,China’secommercegroup,hascontinuedastringofdealsthatisdesignedtostrengthenitsappealaheadofanexpected
TheWorld’sHeaviestDrinkingCountriesPeopleintheUKareamongthemostprolificdrinkersintheworld,accordingtoar
Therearealsopeoplewhoobjecttofairytalesonthegroundsthattheyarenotobjectivelytrue,thatgiants,witches,two-hea
WhenItellpeoplethatI’maprofessorofcommunication,theyoftenareconfused【C1】______whattheterm"communication"means.
WhenItellpeoplethatI’maprofessorofcommunication,theyoftenareconfused【C1】______whattheterm"communication"means.
随机试题
下列药物中不属于中枢兴奋药的为
送入的空气属紊流状气流微生物允许数为浮游菌500/m3
支气管哮喘特异性的血清免疫球蛋白是
2014年12月28日全国人大常委会表决通过任命最高人民法院第一巡回法庭(设在广东省深圳市)和第二巡回法庭(设在辽宁省沈阳市)庭长、副庭长。巡回法庭相当于最高人民法院的派出机构,在审级上等同于最高人民法院,其判决效力等同于最高人民法院的判决,均为终审判决。
年度终了后,会计凭证可暂由会计机构保管1年,期满后应由会计机构移交给本单位档案机构统一保管。()
处于成长阶段的行业特点,产品价格(),利润变为()。
公安机关不同于普通的行政机关是因为()。
据说在英国人那里出现了英语[a]的问题,或者说,英语圈内发生了非规范化向规范化的冲击。真是“吾道不孤”——人们多以为现代汉语非规范化现象太使人生气,原来“天下乌鸦一般黑”,这[b]的恶魔到处在横行霸道。这是英国伦敦一个被称为“保守的思想库”——政策研究中
阅读下列说明、流程图和算法,将应填入(n)处的字句写在对应栏内。【流程图说明】下图所示的流程图5.3用N-S盒图形式描述了数组Array中的元素被划分的过程。其划分方法;以数组中的第一个元素作为基准数,将小于基准数的元素向低下标端移动,而大
Sugar—FriendVSEnemyA)Sugariseverywhere.It’sinourdrinks,it’sinourfoods,andit’shiddeninplacesweneverwouldth
最新回复
(
0
)