首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
admin
2011-02-10
42
问题
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more than a decade, a growing band of scientists and journalists has pointed to studies that seem to link exposure to electromagnetic fields with increased risk of leukemia and other malignancies. The implications are unsettling, to say the least, since everyone comes into contact with such fields, which are generated by everything electrical, from power lines and antennas to personal computers and micro-wave ovens. Because evidence on the subject is inconclusive and often contradictory, it has been hard to decide whether concern about the health effects of electricity is legitimate or the worst kind of paranoia.
Now the alarmists have gained some qualified support from the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. In the executive summary of a new scientific review, released in draft form late last week, the EPA has put forward what amounts to the most serious government warning to date. The agency tentatively concludes that scientific evidence "suggests a causal link" between extremely low- frequency electromagnetic fields those having very longwave-lengths--and leukemia, lymphoma and brain cancer. While the report falls short of classifying ELF fields as probable carcinogens, it does identify the common 60-hertz magnetic field as "a possible, but not proven, cause of cancer in humans. "
The report is no reason to panic--or even to lose sleep. If there is a cancer risk, it is a small one. The evidence is still so controversial that the draft stirred a great deal of debate within the Bush Administration, and the EPA released it over strong objections from the Pentagon and the White House. But now no one can deny that the issue must be taken seriously and that much more research is needed.
At the heart of the debate is a simple and well-understood physical phenomenon: When an electric current passes through a wire, it generates an electromagnetic field that exerts forces on surrounding objects. For many years, scientists dismissed any suggestion that such forces might be harmful, primarily because they are so extraordinarily weak. The ELF magnetic field generated by a video terminal measures only a few milligauss, or about one-hundredth the strength of the earth’s own magnetic field. The electric fields surrounding a power line can be as high as 10 kilovolts per meter, but the corresponding field induced in human cells will be only about 1 millivolt per meter. This is far less than the electric fields that the cells themselves generate.
How could such minuscule forces pose a health danger? The consensus used to be that they could not, and for decades scientists concentrated on more powerful kinds of radiation, like X-rays, that pack sufficient wallop to knock electrons out of the molecules that make up the human body. Such "ionizing" radiations have been clearly linked to increased cancer risks and there are regulations to control emissions.
But epidemiological studies, which find statistical associations between sets of data, do not prove cause and effect. Though there is a body of laboratory work showing that exposure to ELF fields can have biological effects on animal tissues, a mechanism by which those effects could lead to cancerous growths has never been found.
The Pentagon is far from persuaded. In a blistering 33-page critique of the EPA report, Air Force scientists charge its authors with having "biased the entire document" toward proving a link. "Our reviewers are convinced that there is no suggestion that (electromagnetic fields) present in the environment induce or promote cancer," the Air Force concludes. "It is astonishing that the EPA would lend its imprimatur on this report. " Then Pentagon’s concern is understandable. There is hardly a unit of the modern military that does not depend on the heavy use of some kind of electronic equipment, from huge ground-based radar towers to the defense systems built into every warship and plane.
Why did the Pentagon and Whir House object to the release of the report? Because ______.
选项
A、it may stir a great deal of debate among the Bush Administration
B、every unit of the modern military has depended on the heavy use of some kind of electronic equipment
C、the Pentagon’s concern was understandable
D、they had different arguments
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/UkcO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI中级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI中级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
Ifbeingcarriedoutsuccessfully,theplanwillcompletelychangethetrafficconditionsinthecity.
AmericanIndianlanguages,whichdifferwidely,tendedtogroupmanyunitsofmeaningintomultisyllabicwords.
ManyAmericansdonotunderstandwhythereissomuchinternationalcriticismoftheUSpolicyon______change.
Atthebeginningofthetwentiethcentury,NorthAmericansocietyheld,asanideal,theNuclearFamily.Thispresumablyperfect
Heobviouslystandsagoodchanceofgettingthepost,asheiswell______themoreinfluentialmembersofthecommittee.
Itisreportedthatalmost66%ofthelandinthewesternpartofthecountryaredevoidofcultivation.
Followingthenewdiscovery,thescientistshadfinallyprecludedthedoubtsonthevalidityofthetheory.
Notallsoundsmadebyanimalsserveaslanguages,andwehaveonlytoturntothediscoveryofecho-locationinbatstoseeac
JohnCramer,aresearcherattheUniversityofWashington,hascreatedtwodifferentexpositionsofwhatthebigbangmighthave
Aleadin5GbyChinesecompaniesshouldspreadtheiradvantageintomorelucrative,matureandstrategicallyinterestingmarket
随机试题
文小雨加入了学校的旅游社团组织,正在参加与组织暑期到台湾日月潭的夏令营活动,现在需要制作一份关于日月潭的演示文稿。根据以下要求,并参考“参考图片.docx”文件中的样例效果,完成演示文稿的制作。在第1张幻灯片中,参考样例将考生文件夹下的“图片1.png
治疗滴虫阴道炎最常用的药物是( )。
某项目设计生产能力8000台,每台销售价格为300元,单件产品变动成本150元,年固定成本32万元,每台产品销售税金50元,则该项目的产量盈亏平衡点为()台。
巡视是监理人员针对现场()等情况进行的检查工作。
航行目的地是( )的出境船舶,船方在口岸检验检疫机构办理出境检疫手续时,应提供船上所有人员的黄热病预防接种证书。
外源性动机是指人为了获得物质或社会报酬,或为了避免惩罚而完成某种行为。完成该行为是为了行为的结果,而不是行为本身。以下各项中,不属于外源性动机的一项是()。
关于概念,正确的说法包括()。
中国东汉张衡是第一架观测地震方位仪的发明家,请问他的地震仪是根据什么原理运作的?
将两个形状相同的三角板放置在一张矩形纸片上,按图示画线得到四边形ABCD,则四边形ABCD的形状是()。
Чтокасаетсягородскоготранспорта,тоздесьяпредпочелездитьметро,чем____.
最新回复
(
0
)