首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Family Matters This month, Wyoming passed a bill that would give legal teeth to the moral obligation to support one’s parents. C
Family Matters This month, Wyoming passed a bill that would give legal teeth to the moral obligation to support one’s parents. C
admin
2013-08-12
35
问题
Family Matters
This month, Wyoming passed a bill that would give legal teeth to the moral obligation to support one’s parents. Called the Maintenance of Parents Bill, it received the backing of the Government.
That
does not mean it hasn’t generated discussion. Several members of the Parliament opposed the measure. Others who acknowledged the problem of the elderly poor believed it a disproportionate response. Still others believe it will
subvert
relations within the family: cynics dubbed it the "Sue Your Son" law.
Those who say that the bill does not promote filial responsibility, of course, are right. It has nothing to do with filial responsibility. It kicks in where filial responsibility fails. All the law can do is to provide a safety net where this morality proves insufficient. Wyoming needs this bill not to replace morality, but to provide incentives to show it up.
Wyoming faces the problems of an increasing proportion of people over 60 years of age. Demography is
inexorable
. In 1980, 7. 2% of the population was in this bracket. By 2030, the proportion is projected to be 26%. The problem is not old age person. It is that the ratio of economically active people to economically inactive people will decline.
But no amount of government exhortation or paternalism will completely eliminate the problem of old people who have insufficient means to make ends meet. Some people will fall through the holes in any safety net.
Traditionally, a person’s insurance against poverty in his old age was his family care and support for one’s parents is a universal value shared by all civilized societies.
The problem in Wyoming is that the moral obligation to look after one’s parents is unenforceable. A father can be compelled by law to maintain his children. A husband can be forced to support his wife. But, until now, a son or daughter had no legal obligation to support his or her parents.
In 1989, an Advisory Council was set up to look into the problems of the aged. Its report stated with a tinge of complacency that 95% of those who did not have their own income were receiving cash contributions from relations. But what about the 5% who aren’t getting relatives’ support? They have several options:(a)get a job and work until they die;(b)apply for public assistance(you have to be destitute to apply); or(c)starve quietly. None of these options is socially acceptable. And what if this 5% figure grows, as it is likely to do, as society ages?
The Maintenance of Parents Bill was put forth to encourage the traditional virtues that have so far kept Wyoming from some of the breakdowns encountered in other affluent societies. This legislation will allow a person to apply to the court for maintenance from any or all of his children. The court would have the discretion to refuse to make an order if it is unjust.
Those who
deride
the proposal for opening up the courts to family lawsuits miss the point. Only in extreme cases would any parent take his child to court. If it does indeed become law, the bill’s effect would be far more subtle.
First, it will reaffirm the notion that it is each individual’s—not society’s—responsibility to look after his parents. Wyoming is still conservative enough that most people will not object to this idea.
Second, and more important, it will make those who are inclined to shirk their responsibilities think twice.
(A)
But to be sued by one’s parents would be a massive loss of face. It would be a public disgrace.(B)
The hand of the conciliator would be immeasurably strengthened.(C)
It is far more likely that some sort of amicable settlement would be reached if the
recalcitrant
son or daughter knows that the alternative is a public trial.(D)
It would be nice to think Wyoming doesn’t need this kind of law. Those of us who pushed for the bill will consider ourselves most successful if it acts as an incentive not to have it invoked in the first place.
The word
deride
in Paragraph 10 is closest in meaning to______.
选项
A、mock
B、assist
C、haste
D、ignore
答案
A
解析
本题为词汇题,主要考查考生根据上下文对单词deride的理解。该词所在句子的意思是:那些deride为家庭诉讼开庭提议的人忽略了一点,即只有在很极端的情况下,父母才会把他的孩子送上公堂。根据上下文可以判断出deride的意思是“嘲笑”,故正确答案为选项A。选项B(帮助)、C(匆忙)和D(忽视)都不合题意,因此不能选。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/VEfO777K
0
托福(TOEFL)
相关试题推荐
HowlikelyareThomasandNadiatovisitthefollowingattractions?Writethecorrectletter,A,BorCnexttoquestions6-1
Completethenotesbelow.WriteNOMORETHANTWOWORDSforeachanswer.AgricultureandEnvironment(31)productio
AtfirstFionathinksthatMartin’stutorialtopicis______
WritetheappropriatelettersA-Cagainstquestions26~30.Accordingtothespeakers,inwhichsituationarethefollowingm
Thelibrariansaysthattrainingalwaysincludes
ChooseTWOletters,A-E.WhatTWOthingsdoBradandHelenagreetosayaboutlisteningingroups?AListeningskillsareoften
AWoodenbattenBPVCpanelCMosquitorepellentDMattingESupportingwall
airline录音原文中的relyon“依靠,取决于”是题目verifiedby“由……证实,核实”的同义替换。录音原文中表示relyoninformationfromtheair-line,因此答案为airline。
TheDinee,aNativeAmerican(people)ofthesouthwesternUnitedStates,were(once)seminomadichunterswho(practiced)a(few)
AirlineAlliancesCooperativecompetition.Competitivecooperation.Confused?Airlineallianceshavetravelersscratchingtheir
随机试题
翻译者将翻译成中文的量表再翻译回去的步骤是()
梗阻性肝病时,下列哪一项指标升高最明显
制作锤造冠代型时,在模型的基牙上通常采用加蜡的方法恢复其外形和邻接关系,不应加蜡的部位为
实施清创术的最佳时机应该是
混凝土工程中,要泵送混凝土的坍落度不低于( )。
下列会计分录中,不属于复合会计分录的有()。
由于企业销售政策的调整,会导致销售过程中出现某些不确定因素,但这些不确定因素并不影响企业确认收入。()
如果以上市公司作为可比企业对非上市公司进行价值评估时,应在直接按照可比企业标准所得出评估价值的基础上,加上一定金额的控制权价值,减去与上市成本比例相当的金额,调整后的余额才可作为非上市公司的评估价值。()
公安部于2003年1月22日发布的加强公安机关内部管理的“五条禁令”规定:严禁在工作时间饮酒,违者予以纪律处分;造成严重后果的,予以辞退或者开除。()
计算机网络的资源子网的主要组成单元是【 】。
最新回复
(
0
)