首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Municipal bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial, but history shows they can also be highly effective.
Municipal bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial, but history shows they can also be highly effective.
admin
2023-03-07
66
问题
Municipal
bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial, but history shows they can also be highly effective. But are all smoking bans equally successful?
The barkeeper and blogger who writes as "Scribbler50" was outraged when, in 2003, New York City enacted one of the first comprehensive smoking bans in bars and restaurants, "How can a guy and some board just kick us in the teeth like this? This smacks of fascism." If people are aware of the consequences of smoking or visiting places with lots of secondhand smoke, should the government really have to tell us what to do? Won’t people just vote with their feet and smoke even more when they’re at home and away from restrictions?
Scribbler50’s post inspired the physician who blogs as "PalMD" last week to look up the research on the effectiveness of smoking bans. He found several studies showing that not only did workers in restaurants and bars show improved health shortly after the bans were put in place, but smokers themselves also reduced the number of cigarettes they smoked.
Overall, however, smoking rates remain persistently high, despite the common workplace smoking bans. Can other government measures help these smokers live healthier lives, or at least prevent people from taking up the habit?
In the U.S., warning messages have been in place on cigarette packages for decades. But the messages are rather clinical, for example: "Smoking Causes Lung Cancer, Heart Disease, and May Complicate Pregnancy." What if packages contained more dramatic warnings? In January, psychologist and science writer Christian Jarrett looked at a small study of smokers’ reactions to cigarette warnings. The researchers measured self-esteem in student smokers, then showed them cigarette packages with either death-related warnings ("Smokers die earlier") or esteem-related warnings ("Smoking makes you unattractive"). Students who derived self-esteem from smoking and saw the death-related warnings later viewed smoking more positively than those who saw the esteem-related warnings. For students whose smoking wasn’t motivated by self-esteem, the effect was reversed.
So not all anti-smoking messages are equal: Depending on who the message is directed at, a morbid warning on a cigarette label may actually
backfire
.
Scribbler50 for his part, is now a convert favoring smoking restrictions, at least in his narrow limits as a bartender. His patrons who haven’t quit smoking say they smoke a lot less now that they have to go outside to get a nicotine fix. He doesn’t miss emptying ashtrays, or the holier-than-thou customers who complained every time a fellow patron lit up, or working in a smoke-filled bar all night and going home "smelling like you put out a three-alarm".
Would it be right to enact even more restrictions on smoking in the interest of public health? It’s hard to deny that banning smoking in public, indoor spaces has been a huge success. Why not try out some stronger smoking bans? Parents in some areas are already restricted from smoking in cars with children, but I haven’t seen a study that evaluates the success of those measures. Perhaps a state or municipality could try extending the ban to homes, with provisions for studying the results. It’s also possible that stronger measures would be counter-productive, like the stronger warnings on cigarette labels. Maybe we’ll decide that at some level deciding whether or not to smoke should still be an individual choice. Or maybe in a few generations, it won’t be necessary to regulate smoking: There won’t be any smokers left.
According to the passage, _____is NOT caused by smoking.
选项
A、miscarriage
B、pollution
C、lung disease
D、heart attack
答案
B
解析
由第5段第2句可知,吸烟的危害包括引发肺癌(对应C)、心脏病(对应D),以及对孕妇产生危害(对应A“流产”),而B“污染”则无提及,故选B。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/VXcD777K
本试题收录于:
CATTI三级笔译综合能力题库翻译专业资格(CATTI)分类
0
CATTI三级笔译综合能力
翻译专业资格(CATTI)
相关试题推荐
Scientistssentpatternsofelectricitycoursingacrosspeople’sbrains,coaxingtheirbrainstoseelettersthatweren’tthere.
ForMitchellandSkyeCohen,thethird-generationownersofEconomyCandyinNewYorkCity,theshortperiodbetweenHalloweena
Inourcontemporaryculture,theprospectofcommunicatingwith—orevenlookingat—astrangerisvirtuallyunbearable.Everyone
Inourcontemporaryculture,theprospectofcommunicatingwith—orevenlookingat—astrangerisvirtuallyunbearable.Everyone
Inourcontemporaryculture,theprospectofcommunicatingwith—orevenlookingat—astrangerisvirtuallyunbearable.Everyone
Ittookdecadestoprovethatcigarettesmokingcausescancer,heartdisease,andearlydeath.Ittook【C1】________yearstoestab
InApril,BritishresearchersatUniversityCollegeLondonfoundthat,ratherthantherecommendedfive,sevendailyportionsof
[A]Thehormonelevelsinthechimps’urineshowedthat,perhapsunsurprisingly,theytendedtobemorestressedwhentheyenc
Themovementofthesuncreatesperiodsof________.
Today,LincolniswidelyregardedasoneofthegreatestpresidentsinAmericanhistory,inpartbecausehehelpedto________end
随机试题
货币政策指中央银行为实现既定的经济目标,运用各种工具调节【】的一种金融政策和措施。
A.Miles手术B.Dixon手术C.Bacon手术D.Hartmann手术肛管癌选用
患者,女,45岁,消化性溃疡并发瘢痕性幽门梗阻,反复呕吐宿食,消瘦,皮肤干燥,弹性消失,入院后拟在全麻下行胃大部切除术。该患者入院时的主要护理诊断是()
内生肌酐清除率的正常参考值是()。
风电场10kV集电线路或电缆单相接地电容电流大于(),应在变电站装设消弧线圈。
出席董事会的无关联关系董事人数不足5人的,应将该事项提交上市公司股东大会审议。( )
通过列示借款人在一定时期内取得的收入、所发生的费用支出和所获得的利润来反映借款人一定时期内经营成果的报表是()。
以下关于特殊矩阵和稀疏矩阵的叙述中,正确的是_____________。
A、I’msorry.B、It’snothing.C、Sure.Whatisit?D、Oh,whichone?C本题考查的是对清求的回答。题目中问的是“打扰了,我可以问你一个问题吗?”A、B、D与问题无关,只有C是针对问题回答的。所以选
Heredity(遗传)isnottheonlythingthatinfluencesourcolor.Whereandhowweliveafterwearebornis【B1】______too.Forinst
最新回复
(
0
)