首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
As at most colleges, our semester at Notre Dame ends with student evaluations of their teachers. Each time I wonder what the stu
As at most colleges, our semester at Notre Dame ends with student evaluations of their teachers. Each time I wonder what the stu
admin
2011-08-28
37
问题
As at most colleges, our semester at Notre Dame ends with student evaluations of their teachers. Each time I wonder what the students—and their parents—make of this exercise. "Wait," I imagine them saying, "we’ve just paid you tens of thousands of dollars in tuition to take courses at your school, and now you’re asking us to tell you if the teachers you hired are any good? If you didn’t already know that they’re first class, you had no right taking our money."
We don’t hear this kind of response because, in fact, the large majority of teachers at Notre Dame do a good job. We don’t depend on our students to judge our basic competence as teachers, although they often suggest helpful adjustments in our pedagogy (and can call attention to cases of clear incompetence or irresponsibility when they occur). Over all, schools like Notre Dame hire people that they are confident will be competent teachers. And, although there are criticisms and room for improvement, students, parents, graduate/professional schools and employers are, over all, well satisfied with results.
Who are these successful teachers? Ph.D.’s from first-class programs, of course, but that’s because college teaching and research require a high level of specialist knowledge. Beyond this knowledge, college teachers do a good job because of qualities that they already have when they complete their undergraduate education: a high level of intelligence, enthusiasm for ideas and an ability to communicate. In this regard, they are like those who go into other knowledge-based professions like law, medicine, engineering and architecture. With faculties of the "best and the brightest" from the pool of undergraduates, colleges can be confident of good quality teaching. Moreover, as in other knowledge-based professions, college faculties can be trusted to do their jobs well with minimal external supervision, assessment and in-service training. The professional community itself is, on the whole, able to ensure a high level of competence among its members.
These reflections lead me to a simple proposal. Adopt the same model for grade school and high school teaching that works for colleges. Currently, few of the best students from the best colleges are grade school or high school teachers. (The most encouraging data merely suggest that high school teachers may be a bit above average, while grade school teachers are considerably below average). This is not because the best students have no interest in teaching.
Top doctoral programs have far more applicants than they can accept, and many excellent students don’t apply, either because they do not have a high enough level of specialized skills or because they do not want to risk the terrible job market for college teachers. Such students would form a natural pool for non-college teaching if the pay and working conditions were anywhere near the level of the college average. There are also many excellent students with no interest in the advanced research that is the focus of doctoral programs who would prefer non-college teaching to less intellectually engaging and less socially useful work in, say, management or sale.
So why not make use of all this talent to develop an elite class of professionals—like those who teach in our colleges—and give them primary responsibility for K-12 education? One objection is that teaching children and teenagers requires a set of social/emotional abilities—to empathize, to nurture, to discipline—that have little connection with the intellectual qualities of the "best" college students. But there is no reason to think that people who are smart, articulate and enthusiastic about ideas are in general less likely to have these non-intellectual abilities. The idea is to choose those who have both high intellectual ability and the qualities needed to work successfully with children at a given grade level. Moreover, it’s important that teachers be—as they now often are not—credible authority figures, a status readily supported by the justified self-confidence and prestige of an elite professional.
It’s sometimes urged that a high level of intellectual ability is not needed to understand high-school, not to say grade-school, subjects. This is true, but with our current low standards it is not unheard of to find teachers who lack even this basic understanding. Moreover, it requires considerable intelligence to respond adequately to the questions of bright students. Most important, the greatest intellectual challenge of teaching at any level is to find ways of presenting the content effectively. Our current system seems often to assume that K-12 teachers will need the guidance of "experts" to tell them how to do this. There’s considerable doubt as to the existence of the alleged expertise. For decades educational theory has produced a series of failed panaceas (new math, whole-language reading, writing across the curriculum, discovery-based learning, group projects, etc.). But, in any case, more intelligent teachers will be both more likely to develop on their own better methods of teaching and better able to understand and apply any wisdom that may come to them from above.
From The New York Times, June 7, 2012
What’s the author’s attitude toward the idea that a high level of intellectual ability is not needed to understand high-school, not to say grade-school, subjects?
选项
A、He agrees with it and also points that some grade-school and high-school teachers even lack the basic understanding.
B、He agrees with it and thinks that grade-school and high-school teachers are good at understanding.
C、He disagrees with it and and also points that some grade-school and high-school teachers even lack the basic understanding.
D、He disagrees with it and thinks that grade-school and high-school teachers are good at understanding.
答案
A
解析
本题为细节题。从第七段的第二句,This is true,but with our current low standards it is not unheard of to find teachers who lack even this basic understanding.可以看出,作者赞同这一观点,但足指出现状并不让人满意,即使现在对中小学教师要求不高,还是有老师缺乏基本的理解能力,所以选A。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/VeYO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Ofthewell-known"fivesenses"--sight,hearing,smell,tasteandtouch--byfarthemostimportanttomostanimalsissmell.But
ThepoorercountriesofAfrica,Asia,andLatinAmericaseektoreducethedisparityinwealthbetweenthemselvesandtheEurope
Allofthefollowingwordsexcept______areformedthroughaprocessofderivation.
InAmerica,highschoolgraduateshavetotake______inordertoenterprestigiousuniversities.
PubLictransit.InNorthAmerica,publictransportationhasbeenthemajorcasualtyofthecommitmenttotheautomobile.Rider
Coffee,ahotbeveragefavoredbypeopleindifferentregions,issaidtohavebeen【1】______【1】______inEthiopia.Itwasfound
LondonissteepedinDickensianhistory.Everyplacehevisited,everypersonhemet,wouldbedrawnintohisimaginationandre
______isregardedasthemostsuccessfulreligiousallegoryintheEnglishlanguage.
JamesJoycewasafamous______whosemasterpieceUlysseshasbeenhighlyeulogizedintheWesternliteraryworldasoneofthe
Insideagradstudent’sapartmentattheUniversityofPennsylvaniasitsaslightlyfadedblue-and-whitewoodensignfromapost
随机试题
女学生,18岁。1年来月经量增多,2周来发现下肢皮肤有瘀点、瘀斑,伴鼻出血及牙龈出血。体检:轻度贫血貌,脾肋下侧位刚及。化验:Hb90g/L,WBC3.9×109/L,PLT45×109/L,骨髓检查如下:患者首选治疗是
河豚毒素的重要特点是
过度悲忧对气机影响的是
患者,男,58岁,上颌牙列缺失4年,下颌牙列无缺损,曾两次做以塑料为基托的上颌全口义齿修复,均使用不到1年即断裂,要求第3次修复。应选用哪种最佳材料制作基托?()。
建筑施工企业安全生产管理工作中,()是清除隐患、防止事故、改善劳动条件的重要手段。
业务收支以人民币以外的货币为主的单位可以选定其中一种外币为记账本位币,并以选定的外币编报单位财务会计报告。()
某制药厂为增值税一般纳税人,2015年4月销售免税药品取得价款20000元,销售非免税药品取得含税价款93600元。当月购进原材料、水、电等取得增值税专用发票(已通过税务机关认证)上的税款合计为10000元,其中有2000元进项税额对应的原材料用于
【2015.陕西汉中】“新任教师在现实的冲击下,会产生强烈的自我专业发展忧患意识,专业发展集中在专业态度和动机方面”。以上描述的情况属于教师专业发展的()阶段。
Bypersistentandsustainedpractice,anyoneandeveryonecanmaketheyogajourneyandreachthegoalofenlightenmentandfree
Whatdoesthemansayhedid?
最新回复
(
0
)