首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
There is something intrinsically fascinating about the idea of evolution. What principles govern the evolution of a species? And
There is something intrinsically fascinating about the idea of evolution. What principles govern the evolution of a species? And
admin
2019-09-23
33
问题
There is something intrinsically fascinating about the idea of evolution. What principles govern the evolution of a species? And what does evolution tell us about the place of Homosapiens in the grand order of things? The writer George Bernard Shaw held that a mystical guiding force impels life to evolve toward eventual perfection. Modern scientists may not believe in this guiding force or in the possibility of perfection, but many would agree that life has been improving itself through evolution for billions of years. (Note that this conveniently makes Homosapiens, a very recent product of evolution, one of the newest and most improved versions of life.) In the view of these scientists, constant competition among species is the engine that drives the process of evolution and people’s life upward.
To Darwin, nature was a surface covered with thousands of sharp
wedges
, all packed together and jostling for the same space. Those wedges that fared best moved toward the center of the surface, improving their position by knocking other wedges away with violent blows. The standard example that textbooks give of such competitive wedging is the interaction between the brachiopods and the clams.
Clams
were long held to be ancient undersea competitors of
brachiopods
due to the fact that the two species inhabited the same ecological niche. Clams are abundant today, whereas brachiopods (dominant in ancient times) are not. Modern clams are also physiologically more complex than brachiopods are. The standard interpretation of these facts is that the clams’ physiology was an evolutionary improvement that gave them the ability to "knock away" the brachiopods.
In recent years, however, the prominent naturalists Stephen Jay Gould and C. Brad Calloway have challenged the validity of this example as well as the model it was meant to support. Gould and Calloway found that over most geological time clams and brachiopods went their separate ways. Never did the population of brachiopods dip as that of the clams rose, or vice versa. In fact, the two populations often grew simultaneously, which belies the notion that they were fighting fiercely over the same narrow turf and resources. That there are so many more clams than brachiopods today seems rather to be a consequence of mass deaths that occurred in the Permian period. Whatever caused the mass deaths — some scientists theorize that either there were massive ecological or geological changes, or a
comet
crashed down from the heavens — clams were simply able to weather the storm much better than brachiopods.
Out of these observations, Gould and Calloway drew a number of far-reaching conclusions. For instance, they suggested that direct competition between species was far less frequent than Darwin thought. Perhaps nature was really a very large surface on which there were very few wedges, and the wedges consequently did not bang incessantly against each other. Perhaps the problem facing these wedges was rather that the surface continually altered its shape, and they had to struggle independently to stay in a good position on the surface as it changed.
So where does that leave Homosapiens if evolution is a response to sudden, unpredictable and sweeping changes in the environment rather than the result of a perpetual struggle? No longer are we the kings of the mountain who clawed our way to the top by advancing beyond other species. We are instead those who looked to the mountains when floods began to rage below and then discovered that living high up has its definite advantages, so long as our mountain doesn’t decide to turn into a volcano.
According to Gould and Calloway’s theory, evolution______.
选项
A、may not necessarily be based on competition
B、occurs through the differential survival of competing genes
C、is the consequence of the struggle for resources among species
D、is the product of heredity, environmental stimuli, and past experiences
答案
A
解析
推断题。第4段第2句提到,根据古尔德和卡洛韦的理论,物种之间的直接竞争远不如达尔文所认为的那么频繁,后面解释说各物种之间不会不断地相互攻击,只是各自努力在环境变化中占据更好位置。故选A。选项B和C都是达尔文进化论中的观点。选项D未在文中提及。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/VtMO777K
本试题收录于:
CATTI二级笔译综合能力题库翻译专业资格(CATTI)分类
0
CATTI二级笔译综合能力
翻译专业资格(CATTI)
相关试题推荐
Despite(1)thatalcoholicbeveragesmay(2),aleadingmedicalexpertisadvising:don’t(3)justyet.Anybodywho’sever
Despite(1)thatalcoholicbeveragesmay(2),aleadingmedicalexpertisadvising:don’t(3)justyet.Anybodywho’sever
Formorethantwocenturies,American’scollegesanduniversitieshavebeenthebackboneofthecountry’sprogress.Theyhaveed
TheblackpeopledidnotvoteinAmericain1941.
Whatissuggestedforyourinvestment?
A、StudentsinCambridgetendtobeheavysmokers.B、StudentsinCambridgearepoor.C、StudentsinCambridgesmokealot.D、Smoki
A、正确B、错误A推理判断题。根据原文Butrecentfindingssuggestthatanotherpartoftheanswerliesindifferencesbetweenthemaleandfemale
ProblemDescriptionoftheFloodEarlyWarningSystemVocabularyandExpressionsphysically-basedalgorithmdeploy
Gunsturnedinwillbecrushedbeforebeingthrownaway.
Oldageisneitherinherentlymiserablenorinherentlysublime—likeeverystageoflifeithasproblems,joys,fearsandpoten
随机试题
摩托车从注册登记之日起4年以内每______检验1次。
生活型
散射空气比(SAR)
招标采购项目沟通计划的重点不包括()。
固定资产管理中,计提折旧后,将根据()生成记账凭证。
对称的△连接电路中,线电流在数值上是相电流的倍,线电流在相位上滞后与其相对应的相电流30°。()
小王乘坐匀速行驶的公交车。和人行道上与公交车相对而行、匀速行走的小李相遇.30秒后公交车到站。小王立即下车与小李同一方向匀速快步行走。已知他行走的速度比小李的速度快一倍但比公交车的速度慢,一半,则他多久之后追上小李?()
独立自主、自力更生,最根本的是说
SomescientistshavesuggestedthatEarthisakindofzooorwildlife______forintelligentspacebeings,likethewildernessar
Plentyofgamersgetupsetwhentheyloseorfeelthegamewas"cheating."
最新回复
(
0
)