首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Do we need laws that prevent us from running risks with our lives? If so, then perhaps laws are needed prohibiting the sale of c
Do we need laws that prevent us from running risks with our lives? If so, then perhaps laws are needed prohibiting the sale of c
admin
2012-11-20
82
问题
Do we need laws that prevent us from running risks with our lives? If so, then perhaps laws are needed prohibiting the sale of cigarettes and alcoholic drinks. Both products have been known to kill people. The hazards of drinking too much alcohol are as bad as or worse than the hazards of smoking too many cigarettes. All right then, let’s pass a law closing the liquor stores and the bars in this country. Let’s put an end once and for all to the ruinous disease from which as many as 10 million Americans currently suffer alcoholism.
But wait. We’ve already tried that. For 13 years, between 1920 and 1933 there were no liquor stores anywhere in the United States. They were shut down abolished by an amendment (修正案) to the Constitution (to 18th) and by a law of Congress (the Volstead Act). After January 20, 1920, there was supposed to be no more manufacturing, selling, or transporting of "intoxicating liquors." Without any more liquor, people could not drink it. And if they did not drink it, how could they get drunk? There would be no more dangers to the public welfare from drunkenness and alcoholism. It was all very logical. And yet prohibition of liquor, beer, and wine did not work. Why?
Because, law or no law, millions of people still liked to drink alcohol. And they were willing to take risks to get it. They were not about to change their tastes and habits just because of a change in the law. And gangs of liquor smugglers made it easy to buy an illegal drink. They smuggled millions of gallons of the outlawed beverages across the Canadian and Mexican borders. Crime and drunkenness were both supposed to decline as a result of prohibition. Instead people drank more alcohol than ever-- often poisonous alcohol.
On December 5th, 1993 they repealed (撤销) prohibition by ratifying (批准) the 21st Amendment to the Constitution.
When enacting the prohibition laws, government officials assumed that ______.
选项
A、every American would buy alcohol illegally
B、all criminal activities would cease
C、patrols of the Canadian border would halt the sale of alcohol
D、the social threat from drunkenness would decline
答案
D
解析
从颁发禁酒令的理由中可看出,政府官员们认为“There would be no more dangers to the public welfare from drunkenness and alcoholism”,这恰好就是D项的意思。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/WLeC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
Bothofmyparentsprefer______newstoforeignnewswhentheylistentotheradio.
Ididn’tlikeAuntLucy,who______withoutwarningandbringinguspresents.
Heisworkinghard,_____willmakehimpassthefinalexam.
IwasafreshmanincollegewhenImettheWhites.Theywerecompletelydifferentfrommyownfamily.JaneWhiteandIbecamefr
OneeveningMr.Greenwasdrivinghomealongalonelycountryroad.Hehad£100.00inhispocket.Attheloneliestpartofthe
Thepresidentwasexpectedto______somesuggestionsafterreadingallthosereports.
AyoungpairofpandasisexpectedtosettleintheirnewhomeintheAtlanta’sZooto-morrow,tileBeijingYouthDailyreporte
A、lambB、bombingC、combD、ambitionD画线部分读[b],其他选项的画线部分不发音。
Theviewoveravalleyofatinyvillagewiththatched(草盖的)roofcottagesaroundachurch;adriverthroughanarrowvillagest
Theviewoveravalleyofatinyvillagewiththatched(草盖的)roofcottagesaroundachurch;adriverthroughanarrowvillagest
随机试题
A.参芪丸与柏子养心丸B.脑立清丸与六味地黄丸C.金匮肾气丸与牛黄解毒丸D.妙济丸与利胆排石片E.天麻丸与大活络丸因功效相悖而不宜合用的药组是()。
淋巴结转移性癌的确切诊断依据是
根据我国《合同法》的规定,()的合同属于无效合同。
索赔费用中的人工费包括()。
记账凭证既是记录经济发生和完成情况的书面说明,也是登记账簿的依据。()
方差越大,不正确的说法是()
下列各项中,可构成《反不正当竞争法》的保护对象的有()。
满族人忌讳()。
有句俗话叫“要想身体好,天天吃核桃”,多年经验浓缩成的俗话一定有它的道理,最近,有研究证实,多吃核桃的确有益肠道健康,可增加大量的有益肠道细菌,因此对人类心脏有好处。以下哪项可以作为上述论证的前提?
(1)将order_detail1表中的全部记录追加到order_detai1表中,然后用SQLSELECT语句完成查询:列出所有订购单的“订单号”、“订购日期”、“器件号”、“器件名”和“总金额”(按“订单号”升序,“订单号”相同再按“总金额”降序),
最新回复
(
0
)