首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
公务员
I have been consistently opposed to feeding a baby regularly. As a doctor, mother and scientist in child development, I believe
I have been consistently opposed to feeding a baby regularly. As a doctor, mother and scientist in child development, I believe
admin
2017-11-08
979
问题
I have been consistently opposed to feeding a baby regularly. As a doctor, mother and scientist in child development, I believe there is nothing to recommend it, from the baby’ s point of view.
Mothers, doctors and nurses alike have no idea of where a baby’s blood sugar level lies. All we know is that a low level is harmful to brain development and makes a baby easily annoyed. In this state, the baby is difficult to calm down and sleep is impossible. The baby asks for attention by crying and searching for food with its mouth.
It is not just unkind but also dangerous to say a four-hourly feeding schedule will make a baby satisfied. The first of the experts to advocate a strict clock-watching schedule was Dr Frederic Truby King who was against feeding in the night. I’ve never heard anything so ridiculous. Baby feeding shouldn’t follow a timetable set by the mum. What is important is feeding a baby in the best way, though it may cause some inconvenience in the first few weeks.
Well, at last we have
copper-bottomed
research that supports demand feeding and points out the weaknesses of strictly timed feeding. The research finds out that babies who are fed on demand do better at school at age 5, 7, 11 and 14, than babies fed according to the clock. By the age of 8, their IQ (智商) scores are four to five percent higher than babies fed by a rigid timetable. This research comes from Oxford and Essex University using a sample (样本) of 10,419 children born in the early 1990s, taking account of parental education, family income, a child’s sex and age, the mother’s health and feeding style. These results don’t surprise me. Feeding according to schedule runs the risk of harming the rapidly growing brain by taking no account of sinking blood sugar levels.
I hope this research will put an end to advocating strictly timed baby feeding practices.
The word "copper-bottomed" in Paragraph 4 is closest in meaning to______.
选项
A、basic
B、reliable
C、surprising
D、interesting
答案
B
解析
词义题。basic“基本的”,reliable“可靠的”,surprising“令人吃惊的”,interesting“有趣的”。根据第四段的实验结果的具体描述可知这项研究是可靠的。故选B。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/WOQq777K
本试题收录于:
小学英语题库教师公开招聘分类
0
小学英语
教师公开招聘
相关试题推荐
简述足球脚内侧踢球的要点。
延安作曲家在20世纪30年代末40年代是中国声乐创作的重要力量,是以延安_____为中心,重要骨干有_____、_____、马可、安波、郑律成。
根据短文内容,从方框中选出能填入空白处的最佳选项SayingGoodbyeManypeoplewerewaitingforthetrain.Somewerereadingnewspapersandsomewere
Duringthesummerholiday,IthinkIshoulddosomething61.______meaningfulinsteadtouring.SoIgotajo
Alittleboyinvitedhismothertoattend(出席)hiselementaryschool’sfirstteacher-parentmeeting.Tothelittleboy’sdismay,
LastspringIwaswalkinginapark.Infrontofmetherewasamumandher3-year-olddaughter.Thelittlegirlwasholdingas
Somefuturologistshaveassumedthatthevastupsurge(剧增)ofwomenintheworkforcemayportendarejectionofmarriage.Many
Forthispart,youareallowed30minutestowriteacompositiononthetopicWomenAreasPerfectasMen.Youshouldwriteatl
我们明天将不得不面临这些困难。We________________________thisdifficultiestomorrow.
下面是某教师的教学活动片段,根据要求回答问题。T:Hello,everyone!Welcomebacktoschool!Nicetomeetyou!Ss:Nicetomeetyou!T:Whocantellmew
随机试题
瓦尔拉斯定律
下列不属于高危操作人群,不需接种乙型肝炎疫苗些的医护人员是
患者,女性,31岁。近日无明显诱因出现咳嗽,乏力,四肢关节酸痛,伴左侧小腿散在出血点,牙龈红肿出血,无发热、鼻出血、黑便、月经增多,无心悸、头晕、呼吸困难。医院查血常规示:血红蛋白34g/L,白细胞4.3×109/L,血小板16×109/L;骨髓穿刺示:
关于淋巴结转移癌,下列描述正确的是
对于电池的符号为:(-)Pt|Sn4+,Sn2+||Fe3+,Fe2+|Pt(+),则此电池反应的产物为()。
债券市场的功能不包括()。
《城市规划编制办法》共分()。
甲公司为—般纳税企业,适用的增值税率为17%。(1)2011年2月28日,甲公司对办公楼进行再次装修,当日办公楼原值为24000万元,办公楼已计提折旧4000万元;重新装修时,原固定资产装修原值为200万元,装修已计提折旧150万元。(2)对办公楼进行
4π
Throughouthistorymanhasobservedsuchnaturalcyclesastherisingandsettingofthesun,theebbandflowoftheoceantide
最新回复
(
0
)