首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Read the following article about team building in negotiation and the questions on the opposite page. For each question(15-2
Read the following article about team building in negotiation and the questions on the opposite page. For each question(15-2
admin
2015-01-27
32
问题
Read the following article about team building in negotiation and the questions on the opposite page.
For each question(15-20), mark one letter(A, B, C or D)on your Answer Sheet.
Build Your Team in Negotiation
You are leading a negotiating team for your company, facing off with a major client to work out a price increase. You think you’re on solid footing— you’ve done your homework, and you know the terms you’re looking for. But after some opening niceties, one of your team members blurts out: "Just tell us what do we need to do to get more of your business?" And at that moment, you know you’ve lost the upper hand.
Gaffes like this are more common than most businesspeople would care to admit. Team members, often unwittingly, routinely undermine one another and thus their team’s across-the-table strategies. We studied 45 negotiating teams from a wide array of organisations, including ones in the finance, health care, publishing, manufacturing, telecom, and nonprofit sectors. And they told us their biggest challenges came from their own side of the table.
Drawing on the lessons learned from the experiences of these teams, we offer advice on how to manage the two major obstacles to a negotiating team’s success: aligning the conflicting interests held by members of your own team and implementing a disciplined strategy at the bargaining table.
Align Your Own Team’s Interests
It’s not surprising that negotiating teams wrestle with internal conflicts. After all, companies send teams to the negotiating table only when issues are political or complex and require input from various technical experts, functional groups, or geographic regions. Even though team members are all technically on the same side, they often have different priorities and imagine different ideal outcomes: Business development just wants to close the deal. Finance is most concerned about costs. The legal department focuses on patents and intellectual property. Teams that ignore or fail to resolve their differences over negotiation targets, tradeoffs, concessions, and tactics will not come to the table with a coherent negotiation strategy. They risk ending up with an agreement that’s good for one part of the company but bad for another. On the basis of cur research, we recommend four techniques for managing conflicts of interest within the team, internal tradeoffs they must make before they can coalesce around the highest-margin proposal.
Work with constituents
Underlying many conflicts of interest is the simple fact that members represent different constituencies within the organisation. People don’t want to let their departments down, so they dig in on an issue important to their constituents that might not be in the best interest of the whole company. If constituents are presented with all the facts, however, they might be willing to concede more ground because they’ll also see the bigger picture.
To help get everyone on board with a single negotiation strategy, some leaders deliberately assemble teams that contain only individuals good at forming relationships across constituencies. Managers who don’t have the luxury of choosing their team members, though, might have to go an extra mile to engage those constituencies themselves. One way is to invite important opinion leaders or decision makers to attend team planning sessions. Alternatively, team managers might have to embark on multiple rounds of bargaining with constituent departments. One manager described many times he went back and forth between the customer service department, the programme managers, and the engineers. He’d say, "OK, we need you to move a little bit more and get your number down a little bit more. We are close—just come this little extra bit."
What will be discussed in the following paragraph?
选项
A、The third technique for managing conflicts of interest within the negotiating team
B、How to implement a displined strategy at the bargaining table
C、How to avoid gaffes at the bargaining table
D、How to be a good negotiating leader
答案
A
解析
文章第五段中提到“On the basis of our research,we recommend four techniques formanaging conflicts of interest within the team.”即:基于我们的研究,我们推荐四个处理团队内成员利益冲突的技巧。并且在接下来的几段分别陈述了两个技巧,故接下来的部分应该是讲第三个技巧,A项符合题意,为正确选项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/Wc7d777K
本试题收录于:
BEC高级阅读题库BEC商务英语分类
0
BEC高级阅读
BEC商务英语
相关试题推荐
Task3CompanySuccessThecompanyyouworkforhasrecentlywonanawardforitsachievementsinexportsales.Youhavebeenas
Task3CompanySuccessThecompanyyouworkforhasrecentlywonanawardforitsachievementsinexportsales.Youhavebeenas
PersuadingpeopletocometotheBusinessOpportunityShow
FinancialManagement:thefactorsinvolvedinmaintainingahealthycashflowinabusiness
Inthispartofthetest,youareaskedtogiveashorttalkonabusinesstopic.Youhavetochooseoneofthetopicsfromthe
Inthispartofthetest,youareaskedtogiveashorttalkonabusinesstopic.Youhavetochooseoneofthetopicsfromthe
Theinterlocutorasksyouquestionsonanumberofwork-relatedandnonwork-relatedsubjects.
TASKTWO-DISADVANTAGEForquestions18—22,matchtheextractswiththestatements,listedA—H.Foreachextract,choosethebene
TASKTWO-DISADVANTAGEForquestions18—22,matchtheextractswiththestatements,listedA—H.Foreachextract,choosethebene
•Youwillhearadiscussionbetweentwomanagers,JaneandOliver,aboutrecentchangeswithinthecompanywheretheywork.•F
随机试题
周某系H市中级人民法院法官,2006年从该法院辞职。下列关于周某的活动中,可以被允许的是哪一或哪些选项?()
A、≤2日量B、1~3日量C、≤3日量D、3~7日量E、≤7日用量处方限量片剂、酊剂。糖浆剂麻醉药品处方
()是指个人之间相互以货币或实物提供的信用。
根据有关规定,下列不属于投标人与招标人串通投标的行为是()。
The()isIhepersonorcompanywhohasconcludedacontractwiththeshipperforcarriageofgoodsbysea.
商用房贷款合作机构风险主要不包括()。
国家保障各少数民族的合法的权利和利益,维护和发展各民族的平等团结互助和谐关系。()
【《威克斯照会》】湖南师范大学2014年世界史综合真题
根据图尔文(Tulving)的观点,能够用内隐记忆解释的是()。(2015年)
邓小平是伟大的改革家。他的概括为“致富光荣”的政策,帮助数百万中国人摆脱了赤贫,并开辟了在市场经济里盈利或亏本的机遇。他的指导原则是实用主义。“不管白猫、黑猫,逮到老鼠就是好猫”,这是他喜欢的谚语。
最新回复
(
0
)