首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Read the following article about team building in negotiation and the questions on the opposite page. For each question(15-2
Read the following article about team building in negotiation and the questions on the opposite page. For each question(15-2
admin
2015-01-27
98
问题
Read the following article about team building in negotiation and the questions on the opposite page.
For each question(15-20), mark one letter(A, B, C or D)on your Answer Sheet.
Build Your Team in Negotiation
You are leading a negotiating team for your company, facing off with a major client to work out a price increase. You think you’re on solid footing— you’ve done your homework, and you know the terms you’re looking for. But after some opening niceties, one of your team members blurts out: "Just tell us what do we need to do to get more of your business?" And at that moment, you know you’ve lost the upper hand.
Gaffes like this are more common than most businesspeople would care to admit. Team members, often unwittingly, routinely undermine one another and thus their team’s across-the-table strategies. We studied 45 negotiating teams from a wide array of organisations, including ones in the finance, health care, publishing, manufacturing, telecom, and nonprofit sectors. And they told us their biggest challenges came from their own side of the table.
Drawing on the lessons learned from the experiences of these teams, we offer advice on how to manage the two major obstacles to a negotiating team’s success: aligning the conflicting interests held by members of your own team and implementing a disciplined strategy at the bargaining table.
Align Your Own Team’s Interests
It’s not surprising that negotiating teams wrestle with internal conflicts. After all, companies send teams to the negotiating table only when issues are political or complex and require input from various technical experts, functional groups, or geographic regions. Even though team members are all technically on the same side, they often have different priorities and imagine different ideal outcomes: Business development just wants to close the deal. Finance is most concerned about costs. The legal department focuses on patents and intellectual property. Teams that ignore or fail to resolve their differences over negotiation targets, tradeoffs, concessions, and tactics will not come to the table with a coherent negotiation strategy. They risk ending up with an agreement that’s good for one part of the company but bad for another. On the basis of cur research, we recommend four techniques for managing conflicts of interest within the team, internal tradeoffs they must make before they can coalesce around the highest-margin proposal.
Work with constituents
Underlying many conflicts of interest is the simple fact that members represent different constituencies within the organisation. People don’t want to let their departments down, so they dig in on an issue important to their constituents that might not be in the best interest of the whole company. If constituents are presented with all the facts, however, they might be willing to concede more ground because they’ll also see the bigger picture.
To help get everyone on board with a single negotiation strategy, some leaders deliberately assemble teams that contain only individuals good at forming relationships across constituencies. Managers who don’t have the luxury of choosing their team members, though, might have to go an extra mile to engage those constituencies themselves. One way is to invite important opinion leaders or decision makers to attend team planning sessions. Alternatively, team managers might have to embark on multiple rounds of bargaining with constituent departments. One manager described many times he went back and forth between the customer service department, the programme managers, and the engineers. He’d say, "OK, we need you to move a little bit more and get your number down a little bit more. We are close—just come this little extra bit."
What will be discussed in the following paragraph?
选项
A、The third technique for managing conflicts of interest within the negotiating team
B、How to implement a displined strategy at the bargaining table
C、How to avoid gaffes at the bargaining table
D、How to be a good negotiating leader
答案
A
解析
文章第五段中提到“On the basis of our research,we recommend four techniques formanaging conflicts of interest within the team.”即:基于我们的研究,我们推荐四个处理团队内成员利益冲突的技巧。并且在接下来的几段分别陈述了两个技巧,故接下来的部分应该是讲第三个技巧,A项符合题意,为正确选项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/Wc7d777K
本试题收录于:
BEC高级阅读题库BEC商务英语分类
0
BEC高级阅读
BEC商务英语
相关试题推荐
Task5StaffTurnoverAsseveralmembersofstaffhaverecentlyleftthecompanyyouworkfor,themanagementisinvestigatingt
Task5StaffTurnoverAsseveralmembersofstaffhaverecentlyleftthecompanyyouworkfor,themanagementisinvestigatingt
Task3CompanySuccessThecompanyyouworkforhasrecentlywonanawardforitsachievementsinexportsales.Youhavebeenas
(Thecandidatechoosesonetopicandspeaksaboutitforoneminute.)AShopping:theimportanceofplayingbackgroundmusicin
Theinterlocutorasksyouquestionsonanumberofwork-relatedandnonwork-relatedsubjects.
TaskOne-Job•Forquestions13-17,matchtheextractswiththepeople,listedA-H.•Foreachextract,choosethejobeachsp
TASKTWO-DISADVANTAGEForquestions18—22,matchtheextractswiththestatements,listedA—H.Foreachextract,choosethebene
•Readthetextbelowaboutthelogistics.•Inmostofthelines41-52thereisoneextraword.Itiseithergrammaticallyinco
•Readthetextbelowabouttelevisionnetwork.•Inmostofthelines41—52thereistoneextraword.Itiseithergrammatically
随机试题
A、磺胺甲噁唑B、诺氟沙星C、甲氧苄啶D、盐酸乙胺丁醇E、克霉唑为二氢叶酸还原酶抑制药
非水滴定法使用高氯酸溶液的原因是
阴虚而致的汗出为( )。上焦邪热,或中焦湿热郁蒸而致汗出为( )。
在建筑群内地下通信管道设计中,下列哪些项符合规范的规定?()
(2007年)如果把图8-40所示电路中的变压器视为理想器件,则当sinωtV时,有()。
关于《标准施工招标文件》中通用合同条款的说法,正确的是()。
下列事项中,有助于提高企业短期偿债能力的是()。
精简原则是指机构的数量要少,结构层次要少,机关的规模要小,人员要少。( )
当字节数不同的两个有符号位的补码进行加减运算时,03AOH+B8H=()。
Icameacrossthesethingswhichwereprovedtobeantiques.Theunderlinedpartmeans______.
最新回复
(
0
)