首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Theories of the value of art are of two kinds, which we may call extrinsic and intrinsic. The first regards art and the apprecia
Theories of the value of art are of two kinds, which we may call extrinsic and intrinsic. The first regards art and the apprecia
admin
2009-06-15
28
问题
Theories of the value of art are of two kinds, which we may call extrinsic and intrinsic. The first regards art and the appreciation of art as means to some recognized moral good, while the second regards them as valuable not instrumentally but as objects unto themselves. It is characteristic of extrinsic theories to locate the value of art in its effects on the person who appreciates it.(46). In this case, it becomes an open question whether there might not be some more effective means of the same result. Alterntively, one may attribute a negative value to art, as Plato did in his republic, arguing that art has a corrupting or desiderative effect on those exposed to it.
The extrinsic approach, adopted in modern times by Leo Tolstoy in What Is Art in 1986, has seldom seemed wholly satisfactory. Philosophers have constantly sought for a value in aresthetic experience that is unique to it and that, therefore, could not be obtained from any other source. The extreme version of this intrinsic approach is that associated with Walter Pater, Oscar Wilde, and the French Symbolists, and summarized in the slogan "art for art’s sake."(47). They also hold that in order to understand art as it should be understood, it is necessary to put aside all interests other than an interest in the work itself.
Between those two extreme views there lies, once again, a host of intermediate positions. We believe, for example, that works of art must be appreciated for their own sake, but that, in the act of apreciation, we gain from them something that is of independent value.(48). Why should not something similar be said of works of art, many of which aspire to be amusing in just the way that good jokes are?
The analogy with laughter...which, in some views, is itself a species of aesthetic interestintroduces a concept without which there can be no serious discussion of the value of art: the concept of taste.(49). We thus begin to think in terms of a distinction between good and bad reasons for laughter. Amusement at the wrong things may seem to us to show corruption of mind, cruelty, or bad taste; and when it does so, we speak of the object as not truly amusing, and feel that we have reason on our side.
Similarly, we regard some works of art as worthy of our attention and others as not. In articulating this judgment, we use all of the diverse and confusing vocabulary of moral appraisal; works of art, like people, are condemned for their sentimentality, coarseness, vulgarity, cruelty, or self-indulgence, and squally praised for their warmth, compassion, nobility, sensitivity, and truthfulness. Clearly, if aesthetic interest has a positive value, its only when motivated the good taste; it is only interest in appropriate objects that can be said to be good for us.(50).
[A] Thus a joke is laughed at for its own sake, even though there is an independent value in laughter, which lightens our lives by taking us momentarily outside ourselves.
[B] All discussion of the value of art tends, therefore, to turn from the outset in the direction of criticism: Can there be genuine critical evaluation of art, a genuine distinction between that which deserves our attention and that which does not?
[C] Art is held to be a form of education, perhaps an education of the emotions.
[D] Artistic appreciation, appreciation, a purely personal matter, calls for appropriate means of expression. Yet, it is before anything a process of "cultivation", during which a certain part of one’s "inner self" is "dug out" and some knowledge of the outside world becomes its match.
[E] If I am amused it is for a reason, and this reason lies in the object of my amusement.
[F] Such thinkers and writers believe that art is not only an end in itself but also a sufficient justification of itself.
选项
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/Wi2d777K
本试题收录于:
职称英语卫生类基础题库职称英语分类
0
职称英语卫生类基础
职称英语
相关试题推荐
Readthefollowingletterandcompletethegiveninformationform.Writeaword,phraseornumberinthespaces1-5.De
Readthefollowingpassageanddecidewhichanswerbestfitseachspace.Forquestions26~45,markoneletterA,B,CorDo
Whilestillinitsearlystages,welfarereformhasalreadybeenjudgedagreatsuccessinmanystates,atleastUNisgettingp
Tradeiscentraltohumanhealth,prosperityandsocialwelfare.【R1】______Examplesoftradeindailylifearesoabundanttheys
ItiscommonforAmericanstohavedifferent"circlesoffriends"suchaschurchfriends,workfriends,orsportsfriends.【R1】__
Whyaren’ttheUniversity,CollegesandInstitutesjustcalled"University"?Thesimpleransweristhat,withafewexceptions,
WILLIAMTHEHERO!BraveWilliamBaldock,whoissixyearsold,isaheroafterhelpinghismotherwhenshefelldownstairs
Ifyouarestayinghere,youmayleaveyourcarinthisplace.
Weshalltakethetreasureawaytoasafeplace.
Mt.DesertIslandThecoastoftheStateofMaineisoneofthemostirregularintheworld.Astraightlinerunningfromth
随机试题
睡眠有两种不同的时相状态,分别为______和_______。
A、I型超敏反应B、Ⅱ型超敏反应C、Ⅲ型超敏反应D、Ⅳ型超敏反应E、非超敏反应过敏原吸附试验可用于诊断
根据《建设工程安全生产管理条例》,安全警示标志必须符合()。
(2004)“粗野主义”的名称最初是由哪个国家的哪位建筑师提出的?
下列可以作为保证人的有()。
在一起共同抢劫案件中,某省甲市人马某、宋某、周某在该省的乙市内抢劫被抓获,人民检察院决定对本案提起公诉。本案中,如果马某、宋某聘请了辩护律师,则人民法院对于没有委托辩护人的周某可以采取的做法有哪些?()
马克思主义解决哲学基本问题的出发点是()。
2011年,某市工业企业(规模以上,下同)用水总量193.27亿立方米.比上年减少1.66亿立方米。其中,取水总量41.26亿立方米,增加0.57亿立方米;河湖海冷却水86.25亿立方米,增加1.09亿立方米。2011年该市工
两条平行直线之间的距离为()
A、Sheseldomreadsbooksfromcovertocover.B、Sheisinterestedinreadingnovels.C、Shereadonlypartofthebook.D、Shewas
最新回复
(
0
)