首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
This week, a gaggle of girls in hot pants and miniskirts will go on a long and highly publicized strike against their employer.
This week, a gaggle of girls in hot pants and miniskirts will go on a long and highly publicized strike against their employer.
admin
2018-03-27
49
问题
This week, a gaggle of girls in hot pants and miniskirts will go on a long and highly publicized strike against their employer. They will win their case, and in so doing, win a huge battle for working women everywhere—ushering in a new push for equal pay for women and striking a victorious blow for women’ s rights the world over. But in real life, the news isn’ t nearly that inspiring.
On Wednesday, the U.S. senate failed to end debate on the paycheck fairness act. The so-called "commonsense law" would have strengthened anti-discriminatory law put in place by the Equal Pay Act, protected employees from being fired for asking about their colleagues’ compensation, and created negotiation skills training programs for girls and women.
The American Association of University Women recently compared men and women with the same education, same grades, same kinds of jobs, and made the same life choices and found that women earn 5% less in the first year out of school. Ten years later, even if the women gave up having children, they earn 12% less. In another study, Catalyst found that female first-year MBA students earn $4,600 less than their male peers in their first job. In fact, in the 47 years since the Equal Pay Act was first adopted, the pay gap has decreased from more than 40 cents to just under 25 cents. We are literally halfway there.
The republican senators voting against the act, said the act would have been bad for business. And they have been right, but not for the stated reasons. This recession is frequently called the "mancession" and that it has led to 36% increase in the number of families depending on women’s earning in the last year alone, sure, those businesses may be saving money by paying women less, but is it really in the interest of the American public to allow them to save at the expense of families? At 77 cents on the dollar, women will lose an average of $431,000 in pay over 40 years. Those losses could have been spent wisely. When you consider that women reinvest 90% of their income into their own community and family (just 30% to 40% that men invest), the impact could have been powerful. How is that for the common sense?
Mancession has led to the fact that_____.
选项
A、employers violated Equal Pay Law
B、many families depend on women’ s earnings
C、many businesses saved money by hiring woman
D、women reinvest 90% of their income to their community
答案
B
解析
根据题干关键词定位到文章第四段that it has led to 36% increase in the number of families depending on women’s earning in the last year alone…这里提到Mancession(男人衰退)导致更多家庭单单依靠女性的收入过活,故B项“许多家庭依靠妇女的收入”符合原文。A项“雇主违反了同酬法”、C项“许多企业通过雇佣女性来节省开支”和D项“女性将90%的收入再投资于她们的社区”均不是男性受到经济衰退影响的直接结果,故选B。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/WwBZ777K
0
考研英语一
相关试题推荐
Areyoufororagainsttheproject?
Bettingagainstanindustrywithaddictsforcustomerscarriesobviousrisks.【C1】______theseareuncertaintimesforBigTobacco
Bettingagainstanindustrywithaddictsforcustomerscarriesobviousrisks.【C1】______theseareuncertaintimesforBigTobacco
Bettingagainstanindustrywithaddictsforcustomerscarriesobviousrisks.【C1】______theseareuncertaintimesforBigTobacco
Bettingagainstanindustrywithaddictsforcustomerscarriesobviousrisks.【C1】______theseareuncertaintimesforBigTobacco
Bettingagainstanindustrywithaddictsforcustomerscarriesobviousrisks.【C1】______theseareuncertaintimesforBigTobacco
随机试题
属于Ⅰc类抗快速心律失常的药物是
正常组织最小耐受剂量是指
陈某,男,70岁,农民。主诉:小便量少不爽2个月,点滴不出5天。病史:患者2个月前出现小便不爽,于省医院查前列腺B超示:前列腺增生症。5天来小便不通,欲便不能,须经导尿排出。现症:小便不通,面色萎黄,声低懒言,小腹坠胀,食欲不振,舌质淡,苔白滑,脉细弱。
关于水泥混凝土路面横缝设置与施工,下列叙述错误的是()。
在投资估算与概算中,基本预备费的计算基数应包括()。
定金是为确保合同履行,一方向对方支付一定数量的货币,给付定金的一方未履行合同,可拿回部分定金。()
被誉为“中国科学史上的里程碑”的书是______著的《______》。
关于诗词中的词语,下列解释正确的是()。
你在单位里很能干,很受领导重视,但此时新来一同事,比你更有才能,那你将怎么处理和他的关系?
甲、乙、丙、丁、戊和己6人围坐在一张正六边形的小桌前,每边各坐一人。已知:
最新回复
(
0
)