首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Do we need laws that prevent us from running risks with our lives? If so, then perhaps laws are needed prohibiting the sale of c
Do we need laws that prevent us from running risks with our lives? If so, then perhaps laws are needed prohibiting the sale of c
admin
2012-11-20
32
问题
Do we need laws that prevent us from running risks with our lives? If so, then perhaps laws are needed prohibiting the sale of cigarettes and alcoholic drinks. Both products have been known to kill people. The hazards of drinking too much alcohol are as bad as or worse than the hazards of smoking too many cigarettes. All right then, let’s pass a law closing the liquor stores and the bars in this country. Let’s put an end once and for all to the ruinous disease from which as many as 10 million Americans currently suffer alcoholism.
But wait. We’ve already tried that. For 13 years, between 1920 and 1933 there were no liquor stores anywhere in the United States. They were shut down abolished by an amendment (修正案) to the Constitution (to 18th) and by a law of Congress (the Volstead Act). After January 20, 1920, there was supposed to be no more manufacturing, selling, or transporting of "intoxicating liquors." Without any more liquor, people could not drink it. And if they did not drink it, how could they get drunk? There would be no more dangers to the public welfare from drunkenness and alcoholism. It was all very logical. And yet prohibition of liquor, beer, and wine did not work. Why?
Because, law or no law, millions of people still liked to drink alcohol. And they were willing to take risks to get it. They were not about to change their tastes and habits just because of a change in the law. And gangs of liquor smugglers made it easy to buy an illegal drink. They smuggled millions of gallons of the outlawed beverages across the Canadian and Mexican borders. Crime and drunkenness were both supposed to decline as a result of prohibition. Instead people drank more alcohol than ever-- often poisonous alcohol.
On December 5th, 1993 they repealed (撤销) prohibition by ratifying (批准) the 21st Amendment to the Constitution.
It can be inferred from the passage that ______.
选项
A、the Congress was wise to repeal prohibition
B、the Prohibition Era was characterized by a decrease in crime and drunkenness
C、during Prohibition, Americans stopped drinking
D、laws should be passed to ban the sale of alcoholic beverages
答案
A
解析
从文章末尾可以看出,通过一条禁酒法律,饮酒却变得更甚,由此可以推出的结论是国会呼吁禁酒并非明智之举,A项为正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/XLeC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
Youmaytakethemallhome______.
_____whenwepassedbyitsnest.
Oh,sorryAlightedcigaretteburnedahole_____mycoat,andIhavetochangeanotherone.
Alltheafternoonheworkedinhisstudywiththedoor______.
OnceaforeignertravellinginFrancecametoParisforafewdays.【21】theveryfirstdayofhisstayingintheFrenchcapitalh
Please______herofthatimportantmeetingagain.Sheisalwaysforgettingthings.
Onedayalawyer’s(律师)wifefelliiiandhewenttogetadoctor.Thedoctorwenttoseetilewoman,butbeforehewentintoth
Dickwasacleverboy,buthisparentswerepoor,sohehadtoworkinhissparetimeandduringhisholidaystopayforhisedu
Television,itisoftensaid,keepsone【36】aboutcurrentevents,allowsonetofollowthe【37】developmentinscienceandpolitics
Whenyouarebeinginterviewedforajob,rememberthatit’s【61】formanypeopletobenervous,【62】insuchastress-producingsit
随机试题
A、f(2x)B、2f(x)C、-f(2x)D、-2f(x)A本题考查的知识点为可变上限积分求导:若f(x)为连续函数,则F’(x)=,即可变上限的导数为被积函数在上限处值.因此故选A.[错误防范]有些考生误选B.如果
按腧穴可诊断胃病的穴位有
某患者,毛发脱落,呈斑秃,并伴有乏力,下肢无力、发麻,视力下降,失眠,长期居住在废弃的矿渣附近。该患者最有可能是
个人住房贷款与房价款的比例最高为()。
对于通过函证程序无法证实的应收账款,注册会计师应当执行的最有效的审计程序是( )。注册会计师在审计过程中,可以采用函证程序获取充分、适当的审计证据。根据函证秸序的操作特性,这一程序最易发现下列( )存在的问题。
下列能分别对应帝王的谥号、庙号、年号的是()。
美国《1787年宪法》不允许奴隶制的存在。()
未经()许可,人民警察无权擅自变更、转让或者放弃权力。
乙与丙发生口角,甲知此事后,找到乙,谎称自己受丙所托带口信给乙,若乙不拿3000元给丙,就将派人来打乙,乙很害怕,就托甲将3000元带给丙,甲将钱占为己有。对甲的行为应()。
条件“Not工资额>2000”的含义是
最新回复
(
0
)