首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
The danger of misinterpretation is greatest, of course, among speakers who, actually speak different native tongues, or come fro
The danger of misinterpretation is greatest, of course, among speakers who, actually speak different native tongues, or come fro
admin
2014-02-22
55
问题
The danger of misinterpretation is greatest, of course, among speakers who, actually speak different native tongues, or come from different cultural backgrounds, because cultural difference necessarily implies different assumptions about natural and obvious ways to be polite.
Anthropologist Thomas Kochman gives the example of a white office worker who appeared with a bandaged arm and felt rejected because her black fellow worker didn’t mention it. The doubly wounded worker assumed that her silent colleague didn’t notice or didn’t care. But the co-worker was purposely not calling attention to something her colleague might not want to talk about. She let her decide whether or not to mention it, being considerate by not imposing. Kochman says, based on his research, that these differences reflect recognizable black and white styles.
An American woman visiting England was repeatedly offended — even, on bad days, enraged — when the British ignored her in setting in which she thought they should pay attention. For example, she was sitting at a booth in a railway-station cafeteria. A couple began to settle into the opposite seat in the same booth. They unloaded their luggage; they laid their coats on the seat; he asked what she would like to eat and went off to get it; she slid into the booth facing the American. And throughout all this, they showed no sign of having noticed that someone was already sitting in the booth.
When the British woman lit up a cigarette, the American had a concrete object for her anger. She began ostentatiously looking around for another table to move to. Of course there was none; that’s why the British couple had sat in her booth in the first place. The smoker immediately crushed out her cigarette and apologized. This showed that she had noticed that someone else was sitting in the booth, and that she was not inclined to disturb her. But then she went back to pretending the American wasn’t there, a ruse in which her husband collaborated when he returned with their food and they ate it.
To the American, politeness requires talk between strangers forced to share a booth in a cafeteria, if only a fleeting "Do you mind if I sit down?" or a conventional, "Is anyone sitting here?" even if it’s obvious no one is. The omission of such talk seemed to her like dreadful rudeness. The American couldn’t see that another system of politeness was at work. By not acknowledging here presence, the British couple freed her from the obligation to acknowledge theirs. The American expected a show of involvement; they were being polite by not imposing.
An American man who had lived for years in Japan explained a similar politeness ethic. He lived, as many Japanese do, in extremely close quarters — a tiny room separated from neighboring rooms by paper-thin walls. In this case the walls were literally made of paper. In order to preserve privacy in this most unprivate situation, his Japanese neighbor with the door open, they steadfastly glued their gaze ahead as if they were alone in a desert. The American confessed to feeling what I believe most American would feel if a next-door neighbor passed within a few feet without acknowledging their presence — snubbed. But he realized that the intention was not rudeness by omitting to show involvement, but politeness by not imposing.
The fate of the earth depends on cross-cultural communication. Nations must reach agreements, and agreements are made by individual representatives of nations sitting down and talking to each other — public analogues of private conversation. The processes are the same, and so are the pitfalls. Only the possible consequences are more extreme.
In Thomas Kochman’s example, when the white office worker appeared with a bandaged arm, why did her colleague keep silent?
选项
A、Because she didn’t want to embarrass her white colleague.
B、Because she was considerate by imposing on her.
C、Because she didn’t care about her white colleague at all.
D、Because she was aware of their different cultural backgrounds.
答案
A
解析
本题为推理题。根据第二段第三和第四句话“But the co-worker was purposely not calling attention to something her colleague might not want to talk about.She let her decidewhether or not to mention it,being considerate by not imposing.”可知,她同事故意没有提这件事,因为她怕这名同事可能不想谈及此事。她通过不将其强加于同事头上而体现出自己对同事的体贴。A选项“她不想让她的白领同事尴尬”符合基于原文的推断。B和C与原文正好相反。D属于无中生有。因此,A选项正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/XWQO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Itisnaturalforyoungpeopletobecriticaloftheirparentsattimesandtoblamethemformostofthemisunderstandingsbetw
Vitaminsareagroupofsubstancesfoundinfood.Thebodyneedsthemforlifeandhealth.Sonaturally,manypeopleareconcern
Billisanexampleofaseverelydisabledpersonwhohasbecome______atmanysurvivalskills.
Thelowoperatingcostsoftheforeigncompanywill______thehighlaborcoststhebusinesspaysinitsowncountry.
AtleastsincetheIndustrialRevolution,genderroleshavebeeninastateoftransition.Asaresult,culturalscriptsaboutm
Atallagesandatallstagesoflife,fearpresentsaproblemtoalmosteveryone."Wearelargelytheplaythingsofourfears,"
Whenitcomestothetruthofthecase,his______answeris"nocomment".
WhenDonaldarrivedforhisfirstgroup-therapysessionhewasinawheelchair,sufferingfrommalignantmelanomaandseverelyd
Today,ahigh-levelfinancemanagerisjustaslikelytobeacasual-looking21-year-oldasabaldingexecutive.Theyhavealle
Comparisonsweredrawnbetweenthedevelopmentoftelevisioninthe20thcenturyandthediffusionofprintinginthe15thand1
随机试题
银行、证券公司、保险公司在金融体系中统称为()
男性,57岁。以“呕血4小时”为主诉入院,查体:重度贫血貌,肝掌(+),蜘蛛痣(+),脾大肋下4cm,移动性浊音可疑阳性。上消化道出血的病因最可能为
A/氨苯蝶啶B/格列本脲C/胰岛素D/罗格列酮E/二甲双胍蛋白质类降血糖药为
建筑工程价款常用的动态结算方法有______等。
在我国,刑罚中的主刑包括()。
某承包商与业主签订了一份包工包料的单价合同,合同期为5个月。合同中含甲、乙两个分项工程,有关条款如下。(1)甲、乙两个分项工程的清单工程量分别为4000m3、2500m3,单价分别为210元/m3、156元/m3。依据实际完成工程量进行结算。(2)
加涅认为复述不仅能有利于保持信息以便进行编码,也能增加短时记忆的容量。()
新民主主义革命的动力包括()
Ifyourchildonlypicksathisfood,hecanbetrainedtobeagoodeater.Thatwillhappenonlywhenyou’vechangedsomeo
Mosteconomistshategold.Not,youunderstand,thattheywouldturnuptheirnosesatabarortwo.Buttheyfindthereverence
最新回复
(
0
)