首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
The U.S. Senate reached a bipartisan agreement to include a federal menu-labeling law as part of comprehensive health-care refor
The U.S. Senate reached a bipartisan agreement to include a federal menu-labeling law as part of comprehensive health-care refor
admin
2021-02-21
80
问题
The U.S. Senate reached a bipartisan agreement to include a federal menu-labeling law as part of comprehensive health-care reform. The law, which requires chain restaurants to give consumers the information of calories on their menus, has initiated an intensive debate in the country. The implementation of the law means that when you look at a menu from a chain restaurant, those calorie counts will be staring you down. "Order me if you dare," the big Quesadilla Burger from Applebee’s (1,440 calories) may plead.
Nevertheless, the restaurant industry, the biggest opponent of the law, had been pushing a federal bill that would require chains nationwide to post calorie information somewhere near the point of purchase but not on the menu itself. The industry claimed menu postings would be a costly burden and would clutter valuable real estate on the menus. Not surprisingly, chains won’t voice the most obvious argument against high-profile calorie counts, because they’re concerned that consumers will be turned off by what they see.
As the menu-labeling momentum keeps surging, will such policy really improve eating habits? Well, it can do no worse than what’s out there. Researchers observed 4,311 consumers of McDonald’s, Burger King and Starbucks to see if they accessed in-store nutrition data. The info was not on the menu board but in a pamphlet, on a wall poster or an on-site computer. Only 0.1% of the consumers looked at the numbers. If restaurants are sincere about health, they need to put calorie counts on the menu, straight in the customers’ sight lines.
So far, compulsory on-the-menu calorie counts have been implemented in only three localities: Washington’s King County, New York City and Westchester County. And since none of these provisions have been in place for more than a year, nutritionists have yet to gather empirical proof that they work.
Although there is no direct evidence of its effectiveness, prominently displayed calorie counts has been found to steer purchases. Last year, researchers in New York City examined consumer eating habits at Subway, which voluntarily posted calorie info in its stores. This study reported that Subway customers who pondered the calorie information purchased 52 fewer calories than those who didn’t.
Further, the forced disclosure of calories could lead more restaurants to change their offerings. A report by New York City health officials noted that since menu-labeling went into effect last summer, some chains have lowered the calorie counts on certain items. For example, in last March, a Chicken Club sandwich at Wendy’s was listed as being 650 calories. In June this year, the item was 540 calories—a 17% drop.
Meanwhile, Yum! Brands, parent company of Kentucky Fried Chicken, Pizza Hut and Taco Bell, has promised to post calorie information on its menus by next January. If the creator of KFC’s Famous Bowls—fried chicken, mashed potatoes, corn, gravy and shredded cheese packed together for your gut-busting pleasure—volunteers to share these numbers, what excuse can other chains claim for not following suit, particularly if Washington lags in forcing them to do so? The writing is on the wall. And perhaps, as a result, fewer calories will be in your stomach.
[A] has seen the effect of displaying calorie information in its stores.
[B] has begun to reduce calories contained in some of its offerings.
[C] is one of the biggest opponents of the menu-labeling law.
[D] is one of the first localities where the menu-labeling law has been carried out.
[E] does not display nutrition data on its menu board.
[F] has volunteered to disclose calorie information on its menus.
[G] offers a big burger which contains a large amount of calories.
Starbucks
选项
答案
E
解析
Starbucks出现在第三段。该段第三句说到,研究人员对麦当劳、汉堡王和星巴克的消费者进行了观察。第四句讲这些店的营养数据并没有写在菜单上,而是出现在小册子、墙上的海报或者店内的计算机上。亦即星巴克没有将营养数据标在菜单上,E项所述与之相符,故为本题答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/Y2Y4777K
0
考研英语二
相关试题推荐
Withtheriseofthewomen’smovementinthelate1960s,thepoliticalsignificanceofdressbecameincreasinglyexplicit.Rejec
TheUnitedStateshashistoricallyhadhigherratesofmarriagethanthoseofotherindustrializedcountries.Thecurrentannual
1.Whenpeopleindevelopingcountriesworryaboutmigration,theyareusuallyconcernedattheprospectoftheirbestandbright
In2010,afederaljudgeshookAmerica’sbiotechindustrytoitscore.CompanieshadwonpatentsforisolatedDNAfordecades--b
In2010,afederaljudgeshookAmerica’sbiotechindustrytoitscore.CompanieshadwonpatentsforisolatedDNAfordecades--b
Priortothe20thcentury,manylanguageswithsmallnumbersofspeakerssurvivedforcenturies.Theincreasinglyinterconnected
Manyadultsmaythinkthey’regettingenoughshut-eye,butinamajorsleepstudyalmost80percentofrespondentsadmittedton
Inrecentdays,AmericanAirlineshasbeenforcedtocancelmorethan40flightsinPhoenix.Thereason:Withdaytimehighshove
KeithHewson,a29-year-oldairlinepilot,hadn’tplannedtolivewithhisin-lawsafterhegotmarried.Buthequicklyrealized
随机试题
内肋骨反射区位于足背第一楔骨与舟骨之间的凹陷处。()
男性,50岁,患肝硬化3年,出现腹水2个月,间断服用螺内酯。2天来无诱因全腹痛,腹围增大,发热38.5℃,继而出现嗜睡。血常规示WBC4.2×109/L,分类杆状核粒细胞占9%,分叶核粒细胞占80%,该患者病情变化最可能的原因是
放射性烧伤与热力烧伤相对比,下列哪项不正确
患者突然发生口舌㖞斜,口角流涎,舌强语謇,半身不遂。伴见眩晕头痛,胸闷呕恶,舌苔白腻,脉弦滑。诊断为中风之中经络证。针刺治疗时可在主穴的基础上配
某村医发现了1例疑似风疹病例,但该卫生室不具备网络直报条件。该村医填写好传染病报告卡后正确的做法是
某地调查了新生儿身高均数为58.1cm,标准差为2.2cm;6岁儿童的身高均数为119.5cm,标准差为3.4cm。若对比新生儿与6岁儿童身高的变异程度,宜采用
我国颁布的第一个适用于区域性环境影响评价的技术导则是()。
财务净现值率是( )。
某药品销售公司为了提高企业的核心竞争力,一方面加大对内部人员的管理与培训,另一方面准备通过薪酬设计的方法加大对销售人员的刺激,人力资源部的小李负责这次薪酬改革方案的设计与研究。(2008年真题)个人奖励计划的优点表现在()。
新民主主义社会向社会主义社会转变的根本保证是()。
最新回复
(
0
)