首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
The U.S. Senate reached a bipartisan agreement to include a federal menu-labeling law as part of comprehensive health-care refor
The U.S. Senate reached a bipartisan agreement to include a federal menu-labeling law as part of comprehensive health-care refor
admin
2021-02-21
74
问题
The U.S. Senate reached a bipartisan agreement to include a federal menu-labeling law as part of comprehensive health-care reform. The law, which requires chain restaurants to give consumers the information of calories on their menus, has initiated an intensive debate in the country. The implementation of the law means that when you look at a menu from a chain restaurant, those calorie counts will be staring you down. "Order me if you dare," the big Quesadilla Burger from Applebee’s (1,440 calories) may plead.
Nevertheless, the restaurant industry, the biggest opponent of the law, had been pushing a federal bill that would require chains nationwide to post calorie information somewhere near the point of purchase but not on the menu itself. The industry claimed menu postings would be a costly burden and would clutter valuable real estate on the menus. Not surprisingly, chains won’t voice the most obvious argument against high-profile calorie counts, because they’re concerned that consumers will be turned off by what they see.
As the menu-labeling momentum keeps surging, will such policy really improve eating habits? Well, it can do no worse than what’s out there. Researchers observed 4,311 consumers of McDonald’s, Burger King and Starbucks to see if they accessed in-store nutrition data. The info was not on the menu board but in a pamphlet, on a wall poster or an on-site computer. Only 0.1% of the consumers looked at the numbers. If restaurants are sincere about health, they need to put calorie counts on the menu, straight in the customers’ sight lines.
So far, compulsory on-the-menu calorie counts have been implemented in only three localities: Washington’s King County, New York City and Westchester County. And since none of these provisions have been in place for more than a year, nutritionists have yet to gather empirical proof that they work.
Although there is no direct evidence of its effectiveness, prominently displayed calorie counts has been found to steer purchases. Last year, researchers in New York City examined consumer eating habits at Subway, which voluntarily posted calorie info in its stores. This study reported that Subway customers who pondered the calorie information purchased 52 fewer calories than those who didn’t.
Further, the forced disclosure of calories could lead more restaurants to change their offerings. A report by New York City health officials noted that since menu-labeling went into effect last summer, some chains have lowered the calorie counts on certain items. For example, in last March, a Chicken Club sandwich at Wendy’s was listed as being 650 calories. In June this year, the item was 540 calories—a 17% drop.
Meanwhile, Yum! Brands, parent company of Kentucky Fried Chicken, Pizza Hut and Taco Bell, has promised to post calorie information on its menus by next January. If the creator of KFC’s Famous Bowls—fried chicken, mashed potatoes, corn, gravy and shredded cheese packed together for your gut-busting pleasure—volunteers to share these numbers, what excuse can other chains claim for not following suit, particularly if Washington lags in forcing them to do so? The writing is on the wall. And perhaps, as a result, fewer calories will be in your stomach.
[A] has seen the effect of displaying calorie information in its stores.
[B] has begun to reduce calories contained in some of its offerings.
[C] is one of the biggest opponents of the menu-labeling law.
[D] is one of the first localities where the menu-labeling law has been carried out.
[E] does not display nutrition data on its menu board.
[F] has volunteered to disclose calorie information on its menus.
[G] offers a big burger which contains a large amount of calories.
Starbucks
选项
答案
E
解析
Starbucks出现在第三段。该段第三句说到,研究人员对麦当劳、汉堡王和星巴克的消费者进行了观察。第四句讲这些店的营养数据并没有写在菜单上,而是出现在小册子、墙上的海报或者店内的计算机上。亦即星巴克没有将营养数据标在菜单上,E项所述与之相符,故为本题答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/Y2Y4777K
0
考研英语二
相关试题推荐
TheoutbreakofswinefluthatwasfirstdetectedinMexicowasdeclaredaglobalepidemiconJune11,2009.Itisthefirstworld
TheoutbreakofswinefluthatwasfirstdetectedinMexicowasdeclaredaglobalepidemiconJune11,2009.Itisthefirstworld
TheUnitedStateshashistoricallyhadhigherratesofmarriagethanthoseofotherindustrializedcountries.Thecurrentannual
TheUnitedStateshashistoricallyhadhigherratesofmarriagethanthoseofotherindustrializedcountries.Thecurrentannual
Memberstateshadtheoptionto______fromthisagreementwithoneyear’snotice.
High-qualitycustomerserviceispreachedbymany,butactuallykeepingcustomershappyiseasiersaidthandoneShopperssel
Iamaddictedtoelectricity.Soareyou.Andsoisyourbusiness.Weliveinan"alwayson"world—airconditioners,streetlight
Technologyissupposedtomakeourliveseasier,allowingustodothingsmorequicklyandefficiently.Buttoooftenitseemst
Toconfirmthefinding,humanitywouldneedtomakeyetanothertriptoMars."Gettingthereandacquiringthefinalevidenceth
Manisbornfreebutiseverywhereindebt.Intherichworld,gettingholdofyourfirstcreditcardisariteofpassagefarm
随机试题
下列各组经脉中,从手指末端走向头面部的是:
婴儿期持续性青紫,提示
材料、容器(药包材)的更改,应根据所选用药包材的材质,做稳定性试验,考察药包材与药品的相容性的是( )。分内包装与外包装的是( )。
A市B县人民法院受理王海诉邹天名誉侵权纠纷一案,判决邹天在判决生效后1个月内赔偿王海10万元;承担诉讼费用;并在该市日报上登报赔礼道歉,日后不得在任何场合有侵害王海名誉的言行。邹天不服,提起上诉,A市中级人民法院经审理作出维持原判的二审判决。判决于5月12
某政府采购项目采用询价方式组织两台高速复印机采购,采购人按照以下程序组织了本次询价采购:(1)成立了三人询价小组,其中采购人代表一人,为行政处处长;由财政部门组建的政府采购评审专家库中确定的评审专家二人。(2)编制询价文件。为便于采购人
干粉灭火剂由一种或多种具有灭火能力的细微无机粉末组成,窒息、冷却、辐射及对有焰燃烧的化学抑制作用是干粉灭火效能的集中体现,其中()作用是灭火的基本原理,起主要灭火作用。
有关石油化工企业总平面布局的说法,正确的有()。
某公司在本年度下列经济事项中,不影响本年度利润表中营业利润的是()。
普通货物包括()。
Completethenotesbelow.WriteONEWORDONLYforeachanswer.NotesonCustomer’sInformationExampleAnswerInforma
最新回复
(
0
)