首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
The U.S. Senate reached a bipartisan agreement to include a federal menu-labeling law as part of comprehensive health-care refor
The U.S. Senate reached a bipartisan agreement to include a federal menu-labeling law as part of comprehensive health-care refor
admin
2021-02-21
50
问题
The U.S. Senate reached a bipartisan agreement to include a federal menu-labeling law as part of comprehensive health-care reform. The law, which requires chain restaurants to give consumers the information of calories on their menus, has initiated an intensive debate in the country. The implementation of the law means that when you look at a menu from a chain restaurant, those calorie counts will be staring you down. "Order me if you dare," the big Quesadilla Burger from Applebee’s (1,440 calories) may plead.
Nevertheless, the restaurant industry, the biggest opponent of the law, had been pushing a federal bill that would require chains nationwide to post calorie information somewhere near the point of purchase but not on the menu itself. The industry claimed menu postings would be a costly burden and would clutter valuable real estate on the menus. Not surprisingly, chains won’t voice the most obvious argument against high-profile calorie counts, because they’re concerned that consumers will be turned off by what they see.
As the menu-labeling momentum keeps surging, will such policy really improve eating habits? Well, it can do no worse than what’s out there. Researchers observed 4,311 consumers of McDonald’s, Burger King and Starbucks to see if they accessed in-store nutrition data. The info was not on the menu board but in a pamphlet, on a wall poster or an on-site computer. Only 0.1% of the consumers looked at the numbers. If restaurants are sincere about health, they need to put calorie counts on the menu, straight in the customers’ sight lines.
So far, compulsory on-the-menu calorie counts have been implemented in only three localities: Washington’s King County, New York City and Westchester County. And since none of these provisions have been in place for more than a year, nutritionists have yet to gather empirical proof that they work.
Although there is no direct evidence of its effectiveness, prominently displayed calorie counts has been found to steer purchases. Last year, researchers in New York City examined consumer eating habits at Subway, which voluntarily posted calorie info in its stores. This study reported that Subway customers who pondered the calorie information purchased 52 fewer calories than those who didn’t.
Further, the forced disclosure of calories could lead more restaurants to change their offerings. A report by New York City health officials noted that since menu-labeling went into effect last summer, some chains have lowered the calorie counts on certain items. For example, in last March, a Chicken Club sandwich at Wendy’s was listed as being 650 calories. In June this year, the item was 540 calories—a 17% drop.
Meanwhile, Yum! Brands, parent company of Kentucky Fried Chicken, Pizza Hut and Taco Bell, has promised to post calorie information on its menus by next January. If the creator of KFC’s Famous Bowls—fried chicken, mashed potatoes, corn, gravy and shredded cheese packed together for your gut-busting pleasure—volunteers to share these numbers, what excuse can other chains claim for not following suit, particularly if Washington lags in forcing them to do so? The writing is on the wall. And perhaps, as a result, fewer calories will be in your stomach.
[A] has seen the effect of displaying calorie information in its stores.
[B] has begun to reduce calories contained in some of its offerings.
[C] is one of the biggest opponents of the menu-labeling law.
[D] is one of the first localities where the menu-labeling law has been carried out.
[E] does not display nutrition data on its menu board.
[F] has volunteered to disclose calorie information on its menus.
[G] offers a big burger which contains a large amount of calories.
Starbucks
选项
答案
E
解析
Starbucks出现在第三段。该段第三句说到,研究人员对麦当劳、汉堡王和星巴克的消费者进行了观察。第四句讲这些店的营养数据并没有写在菜单上,而是出现在小册子、墙上的海报或者店内的计算机上。亦即星巴克没有将营养数据标在菜单上,E项所述与之相符,故为本题答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/Y2Y4777K
0
考研英语二
相关试题推荐
Theauthorthinksthatpullfactors______.Peoplemovingwithincountrybordersareoftenmotivatedbythedesireto______.
TheoutbreakofswinefluthatwasfirstdetectedinMexicowasdeclaredaglobalepidemiconJune11,2009.Itisthefirstworld
TheoutbreakofswinefluthatwasfirstdetectedinMexicowasdeclaredaglobalepidemiconJune11,2009.Itisthefirstworld
TheUnitedStateshashistoricallyhadhigherratesofmarriagethanthoseofotherindustrializedcountries.Thecurrentannual
Conveniencefoodhelpscompaniesbycreatinggrowth;butwhatisitseffectonpeople?Forpeoplewhothinkcookingwasthefoun
Whowouldhavethoughtthatglobally,theITindustryproducesaboutthesamevolumeofgreenhousegasesastheworld’sairlines
Newscientificstudiesrevealthehiddencostsofmultitaskingastechnologyincreasinglytemptspeopletodomorethanonethin
Technologyissupposedtomakeourliveseasier,allowingustodothingsmorequicklyandefficiently.Buttoooftenitseemst
Inrecentdays,AmericanAirlineshasbeenforcedtocancelmorethan40flightsinPhoenix.Thereason:Withdaytimehighshove
Manisbornfreebutiseverywhereindebt.Intherichworld,gettingholdofyourfirstcreditcardisariteofpassagefarm
随机试题
烧伤休克期补液的调节,观察的指标是
图21—2示输卵管妊娠,其最常见的部位是
男,72岁。1周前左下后牙疼痛未予治疗,逐渐发展为口底肿胀、高热和呼吸困难。检查:T39.3℃。急性病容,呼吸急促,口底广泛水肿、充血、质硬、压痛明显,存在明显的凹陷性水肿和捻发音,张口受限,舌体抬高,言语不清,吞咽困难。行广泛切开引流时,病变区肌组织
丙硫氧嘧啶的主要适应证有( )。
患者,女性,初潮13岁,月经规则,月经周期26天,排卵时间一般在月经周期的
长江公司于2017年1月1日签署了一份关于向黄河公司销售一台大型加工机械设备的买卖约定,该设备的销售总价为4800万元,采用分期收款方式分6期平均收取,合同签署日收取800万元,剩余款项分5期在每年12月31日平均收取。长江公司于2017年1月1日发出该
社会保险包括()。
自我反思是大学生思维的主要特点之一。
简述讲授法运用的基本要求。
当代中国最基本的价值取向和行为准则是()
最新回复
(
0
)