首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
The U.S. Senate reached a bipartisan agreement to include a federal menu-labeling law as part of comprehensive health-care refor
The U.S. Senate reached a bipartisan agreement to include a federal menu-labeling law as part of comprehensive health-care refor
admin
2021-02-21
41
问题
The U.S. Senate reached a bipartisan agreement to include a federal menu-labeling law as part of comprehensive health-care reform. The law, which requires chain restaurants to give consumers the information of calories on their menus, has initiated an intensive debate in the country. The implementation of the law means that when you look at a menu from a chain restaurant, those calorie counts will be staring you down. "Order me if you dare," the big Quesadilla Burger from Applebee’s (1,440 calories) may plead.
Nevertheless, the restaurant industry, the biggest opponent of the law, had been pushing a federal bill that would require chains nationwide to post calorie information somewhere near the point of purchase but not on the menu itself. The industry claimed menu postings would be a costly burden and would clutter valuable real estate on the menus. Not surprisingly, chains won’t voice the most obvious argument against high-profile calorie counts, because they’re concerned that consumers will be turned off by what they see.
As the menu-labeling momentum keeps surging, will such policy really improve eating habits? Well, it can do no worse than what’s out there. Researchers observed 4,311 consumers of McDonald’s, Burger King and Starbucks to see if they accessed in-store nutrition data. The info was not on the menu board but in a pamphlet, on a wall poster or an on-site computer. Only 0.1% of the consumers looked at the numbers. If restaurants are sincere about health, they need to put calorie counts on the menu, straight in the customers’ sight lines.
So far, compulsory on-the-menu calorie counts have been implemented in only three localities: Washington’s King County, New York City and Westchester County. And since none of these provisions have been in place for more than a year, nutritionists have yet to gather empirical proof that they work.
Although there is no direct evidence of its effectiveness, prominently displayed calorie counts has been found to steer purchases. Last year, researchers in New York City examined consumer eating habits at Subway, which voluntarily posted calorie info in its stores. This study reported that Subway customers who pondered the calorie information purchased 52 fewer calories than those who didn’t.
Further, the forced disclosure of calories could lead more restaurants to change their offerings. A report by New York City health officials noted that since menu-labeling went into effect last summer, some chains have lowered the calorie counts on certain items. For example, in last March, a Chicken Club sandwich at Wendy’s was listed as being 650 calories. In June this year, the item was 540 calories—a 17% drop.
Meanwhile, Yum! Brands, parent company of Kentucky Fried Chicken, Pizza Hut and Taco Bell, has promised to post calorie information on its menus by next January. If the creator of KFC’s Famous Bowls—fried chicken, mashed potatoes, corn, gravy and shredded cheese packed together for your gut-busting pleasure—volunteers to share these numbers, what excuse can other chains claim for not following suit, particularly if Washington lags in forcing them to do so? The writing is on the wall. And perhaps, as a result, fewer calories will be in your stomach.
[A] has seen the effect of displaying calorie information in its stores.
[B] has begun to reduce calories contained in some of its offerings.
[C] is one of the biggest opponents of the menu-labeling law.
[D] is one of the first localities where the menu-labeling law has been carried out.
[E] does not display nutrition data on its menu board.
[F] has volunteered to disclose calorie information on its menus.
[G] offers a big burger which contains a large amount of calories.
Starbucks
选项
答案
E
解析
Starbucks出现在第三段。该段第三句说到,研究人员对麦当劳、汉堡王和星巴克的消费者进行了观察。第四句讲这些店的营养数据并没有写在菜单上,而是出现在小册子、墙上的海报或者店内的计算机上。亦即星巴克没有将营养数据标在菜单上,E项所述与之相符,故为本题答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/Y2Y4777K
0
考研英语二
相关试题推荐
Accordingtothepassage,thefactthatyoungpeopleseemtobelosinginterestinscience______.Thebesttitleforthepassa
TheoutbreakofswinefluthatwasfirstdetectedinMexicowasdeclaredaglobalepidemiconJune11,2009.Itisthefirstworld
TheUnitedStateshashistoricallyhadhigherratesofmarriagethanthoseofotherindustrializedcountries.Thecurrentannual
In2010,afederaljudgeshookAmerica’sbiotechindustrytoitscore.CompanieshadwonpatentsforisolatedDNAfordecades--b
ThegiantMirafioriplantinTurinistheheartofFiatAuto,thetroubledcardivisionoftheFiatgroup.Astheearlyshifttr
Manyadultsmaythinkthey’regettingenoughshut-eye,butinamajorsleepstudyalmost80percentofrespondentsadmittedton
Iamaddictedtoelectricity.Soareyou.Andsoisyourbusiness.Weliveinan"alwayson"world—airconditioners,streetlight
Inresponsetoscandalsrockingthestudentloanindustry,theHousehasquicklypassedreformlegislationtorequiremorediscl
Banks,troubledbyregulatorsandshortofcapital,arefleeingthecommoditiesbusiness.DeutscheBank,MorganStanleyandUBS
Manisbornfreebutiseverywhereindebt.Intherichworld,gettingholdofyourfirstcreditcardisariteofpassagefarm
随机试题
关于癫痫临床表现的叙述,下列哪项不正确
A.宣毒发表汤B.清解透表汤C.透疹凉解汤D.解肌透痧汤E.凉营清气汤
A.《医经产品注册证》B.《进口准许证》c.《进口药品注册证》D.《药品经营许可证》E.《进口药品通关单》根据《药品管理法》规定:从某国进口动脉粥样硬化药品,海关放行应持有
A.【适应症】B.【注意事项】C.【不良反应】D.【药理毒理】E.【药物相互作用】根据《化学药品和治疗用生物制品说明书规范细则》“服用本品后可能出现皮疹,停药后可恢复”应列入说明书的()。
个人质押贷款的业务操作重点在于对质物的()。
下列选项中,量化一个完整的理财目标应包括的内容是()。
比内-西蒙量表的智力等级为优秀,其智商范围是()。
甲与乙系夫妻,在夫妻关系存续期间取得下列财产,其中不属于夫妻共同财产的是()。
评述柏拉图在教育史上的地位和影响。
Togetachocolateoutofaboxdemandsaconsiderableamountofunpacking:theboxhastobetakenoutofitspaperbag;thepl
最新回复
(
0
)