首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
When I was a graduate student in biochemistry at Tufts University School of Medicine, I read an abridged version of Montaigne’s
When I was a graduate student in biochemistry at Tufts University School of Medicine, I read an abridged version of Montaigne’s
admin
2014-12-11
82
问题
When I was a graduate student in biochemistry at Tufts University School of Medicine, I read an abridged version of Montaigne’s Essays. My friend Margaret Rea and I spent hours wandering around Boston discussing the meaning and implications of the essays. Michel de Montaigne lived in the 16th century near Bordeaux, France. He did his writing in the southwest tower of his chateau, where he surrounded himself with a library of more than 1,000 books, a remarkable collection for that time. Montaigne posed the question, "What do I know?" By extension, he asks us all: Why do you believe what you think you know? My latest attempt to answer Montaigne can be found in Everyday Practice of Science: Where Intuition and Passion Meet Objectivity and Logic, originally published in January 2009 and soon to be out in paperback from the Oxford University Press.
Scientists tend to be glib about answering Montaigne’s question. After all, the success of technology testifies to the truth of our work. But the situation is more complicated.
In the idealized version of how science is done, facts about the world are waiting to be observed and collected by objective researchers who use the scientific method to carry out their work. But in the everyday practice of science, discovery frequently follows an ambiguous and complicated route. We aim to be objective, but we cannot escape the context of our unique life experiences. Prior knowledge and interests influence what we experience, what we think our experiences mean, and the subsequent actions we take. Opportunities for misinterpretation, error, and self-deception abound.
Consequently, discovery claims should be thought of as protoscience. Similar to newly staked mining claims, they are full of potential. But it takes communal scrutiny and acceptance to transform a discovery claim into a mature discovery. This is the credibility process, through which the individual researcher’s me, here, now becomes the community’s anyone, anywhere, anytime. Objective knowledge is the goal, not the starting point.
Once a discovery claim becomes public, the discoverer receives intellectual credit. But, unlike with mining claims, the community takes control of what happens next. Within the complex social structure of the scientific community, researchers make discoveries; editors and reviewers act as gatekeepers by controlling the publication process; other scientists use the new finding to suit their own purposes; and finally, the public (including other scientists) receives the new discovery and possibly accompanying technology. As a discovery claim works its way through the community, a dialectic of interaction and confrontation between shared and competing beliefs about the science and the technology involved transforms an individual’s discovery claim into the community’s credible discovery.
Two paradoxes infuse this credibility process. First, scientific work tends to focus on some aspect of prevailing knowledge that is viewed as incomplete or incorrect. Little reward accompanies duplication and confirmation of what is already known and believed. The goal is new-search, not research. Not surprisingly, newly published discovery claims and credible discoveries that appear to be important and convincing will always be open to challenge and potential modification or refutation by future researchers. Second, novelty itself frequently provokes disbelief. Nobel Laureate and physiologist Albert Szent-Gyorgyi once described discovery as "seeing what everybody has seen and thinking what nobody has thought." But thinking what nobody else has thought and telling others what they have missed may not change their views. Sometimes years are required for truly novel discovery claims to be accepted and appreciated.
In the end, credibility "happens" to a discovery claim — a process that corresponds to what philosopher Annette Baier has described as the commons of the mind. "We reason together, challenge, revise, and complete each other’s reasoning and each other’s conceptions of reason," she wrote in a book with that title. In the case of science, it is the commons of the mind where we find the answer to Montaigne’s question: Why do you believe what you think you know?
It can be inferred from Paragraph 4 that credibility process requires
选项
A、strict inspection.
B、shared efforts.
C、individual wisdom.
D、persistent innovation.
答案
B
解析
推理判断题。由第四段第四句This is the credibility process,through which…可知,在credibilityprocess这一过程中,研究者个人变成了科学界中任何地点、任何时间的任何人,由此推断这一过程付诸了科学界所有人的共同努力,故答案为[B]。文中在提到这一过程需要scrutiny时,用词是communal scrutiny,可见仍在强调需要共同的审查,而不是[A]中所述的strict inspection;[C]是根据第四段第四句的individual设置的反向干扰;[D]是脱离文章的想当然。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/YDdO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
HandleWithCareWhenThomasButlersteppedoffaplaneinApril2002onhisreturntotheUnitedStatesfromatriptoTanz
EducationStandardsAreNottheAnswerSen.ChristopherDoddandRep.VernonEhlershaverecentlyproposedabilltocreate
TheGoldenYearsRuleOnekeytoahappyretirementisthemeanstoenjoyit.RogerdeHaanendedupwithmorethanenoughm
The(Non)RisksofMobilePhonesDomobilephonescauseexplosionsatpetrolstations?Thatquestionhasjustbeenexhaustiv
GorkyParkisfamousformanythings,notmanyofthemgood.ForMuscovites,theircity’sbiggestgreenspaceusedtobeknowna
Inthe1960s,_____becameworldfamousandturnedtheirhometownofLiverpoolintoaplaceofpilgrimage.
Stupendouspriceswerepaidinahistoricsaleof19th-and20th-centuryavant-gardepaintingscollectedoveralifetimebyJohn
AccordingtoChitra,______charactersareconsideredtobenotwelldepicted.
Accordingtothenews,peopleinmostMuslimcountries
随机试题
在PowerPoint2010中,可选择______________选项卡来设置幻灯片版式。
患者,男,38岁。1周前感冒后出现咳嗽、呼吸短促,咽干多饮,近3日自觉排尿不畅,点滴而出,苔薄黄舌红,脉数。应诊为
工程监理规划是工程监理单位根据委托工程监理合同制定的。指导监理组织全面开展监理工作的纲领性文件,由()主持编制。
加勒比岛国海地当地时间2010年1月12日下午发生里氏7.3级强烈地震,首都太子港及全国大部分地区受灾情况严重.地震发生后,国际社会纷纷伸出援手,表示将向海地提供人道主义援助.中国救援队在搜救过程中发现一名生还者被一块约1.8吨的建筑材料堵在一个狭小的空间
文史、考古文博等专业人员,他们既熟悉简化字,又掌握繁体字,所以汉字简化对他们的研究工作没有影响。非文史、考古文博等专业人员,他们不管是不是掌握了繁体字,都不能直接阅读古籍,所以汉字简化对他们也没有影响。总之,说汉字简化切断了传统文化是_______,以此为
某市机要局向K公司购买办公用品(手提电脑10台)后发现质量问题,现该局依法向K公司索赔,其所依之法是()。
设3阶矩阵A的特征值为1,2,2,E为3阶单位矩阵,则丨4A-1-E丨=_________.
Anetworkinterfaceporthascollisiondetectionandcarriersensingenabledonasharedtwistedpairnetwork.Fromthisstateme
A、Wetendtobesatisfiedafterasecondthought.B、Wearenotalwaysthrilledwiththemafterwards.C、Wealwaysregretthehast
A、Itembodiestheconceptofdemocracy.B、Itensuresthebenefitsofthemajority.C、Ithelpsthestateavoidapoliticalcrisis
最新回复
(
0
)