Who’s poor in America? That’s a question hard to answer. Hard because there’s no conclusive definition of poverty. Low income ma

admin2023-01-29  18

问题     Who’s poor in America? That’s a question hard to answer. Hard because there’s no conclusive definition of poverty. Low income matters, though how low is unclear. Poverty is also a state of mind that fosters self-defeating behavior—bad work habits, family breakdowns, and addictions. Finally, poverty results from bad luck: accidents, job losses, disability.
    Despite poverty’s messiness, we’ve measured progress against it by a single statistic: the federal poverty line. By this measure, we haven’t made much progress. But the apparent lack of progress is misleading for two reasons.
    First, it ignores immigration. Many immigrants are poor and low-skilled. They add to the poor. From 1989 to 2007, about three quarters of the increase in the poverty population occurred among Hispanics (西班牙裔美国人)—mostly immigrants and their children.
    Second, the poor’s material well-being has improved. The official poverty measure obscures this by counting only pre-tax cash income and ignoring other sources of support, including food stamps and housing subsidies. Although many poor live from hand to mouth, they’ve participated in rising living standards. In 2005, 91% had microwaves, 79% air-conditioning, and 48% cell phones.
    The existing poverty line could be improved by adding some income sources and subtracting some expenses. Unfortunately, the administration’s proposal for a "supplemental poverty measure" in 2011 goes beyond that. The new poverty number would compound public confusion. It also raises questions about whether the statistic is tailored to favor a political agenda.
    The "supplemental measure" ties the poverty threshold to what the poorest third of Americans spend on food, housing, clothing, and utilities. The actual threshold will probably be higher than today’s poverty line Many Americans would find this weird people get richer, but "poverty" stays stuck.
    What produces this outcome is a different view of poverty. The present concept is an absolute one: the poverty threshold reflects the amount estimated to meet basic needs. By contrast, the new measure embraces a relative notion of poverty: people are automatically poor if they’re a given distance from the top, even if their incomes are increasing.
    The new indicator is a "propaganda device" to promote income redistribution by showing that poverty is stubborn or increasing. The Census Bureau has estimated statistics similar to the administration’s proposal. In 2008, the traditional poverty rate was 13.2%; estimates of the new statistic range up to 17%. The new poverty statistic exceeds the old, and the gap grows larger over time.
    As senator Daniel Moynihan said, the administration is defining poverty up. It’s legitimate to debate how much we should aid the poor or reduce economic inequality. But the debate should not be swayed by misleading statistics that few Americans could possibly understand. Government statistics should strive for political neutrality (中立). This one fails.
What is the main idea of the first paragraph?

选项 A、Poverty is very often defined as a state of mind.
B、Bad work habits and bad luck lead to poverty.
C、Poverty is a problem hard to tackle in America.
D、There is no consensus on the concept of poverty.

答案D

解析 题目问第1段的大意。第1段用问句开头,指出“谁是穷人”这个问题很难回答,因为对贫困没有确定的定义。故D项的 “没有达成共识”对应原文no conclusive definition为答案。A项“贫穷经常被定义为一种心理状态”利用state of mind干扰,该段倒数第2句喻指贫穷这种心理状态会引起自我挫败行为,不是给贫穷下定义。B项“贫穷在美国是一个很难解决的问题”,而原文说的hard,是指难以回答who’s poor这个问题,而不是说贫困问题很难解决。C项“不良的工作习惯和坏运气导致贫穷”与倒数第2句所说的贫穷导致不良工作习惯因果颠倒。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/YHvD777K
0

最新回复(0)