首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
(1) Two sides almost never change: That you can manipulate people into self-sufficiency and that you can punish them into good c
(1) Two sides almost never change: That you can manipulate people into self-sufficiency and that you can punish them into good c
admin
2022-02-01
58
问题
(1) Two sides almost never change: That you can manipulate people into self-sufficiency and that you can punish them into good citizenship.
(2) The first manifests itself in our tireless search for the magical level at which welfare grants are big enough to meet basic needs but small enough to make low-paid work attractive. The second has us looking to the criminal justice system to cure behavior that is as much as anything the result of despair.
(3) The welfare example is well known. We don’t want poor people to live in squalor or their children to be malnourished. But we also don’t want to subsidize the indolence of people who are too lazy to work. The first impulse leads us to provide housing, food stamps, medical care and a cash stipend for families in need. The second gets us to think about "workforce".
(4) We’ve been thinking about it for two reasons: the "nanny" problems of two high-ranking government officials (who hired undocumented foreigners as household helpers, presumably because they couldn’t find Americans to do the work) and President Clinton’s proposal to put a two-year limit on welfare.
(5) Maybe something useful will come of Clinton’s idea, but I’m not all that hopeful. It looks to me like one more example of trying to manipulate people into taking care of themselves.
(6) On the criminal justice side, we hope to make punishment tough enough to discourage crime but not so tough as to clog our prisons with relatively minor offenders. Too short a sentence, we fear, will create contempt for the law. Too long a sentence will take up costly space better used for the violent and unremorseful.
(7) Not only can we never find the "perfect" punishment, our search for optimum penalties is complicated by our desire for fairness: to let the punishment fit the crime.
The problem is that almost any punishment - even the disgrace of being charged with a crime - is sufficient to deter the middle class, while for members of the underclass, probation may be translated as " I beat it."
(8) So how can you use the system - welfare or criminal justice - to produce the behavior we want? The answer, I suspect is: You can’t.
(9) We keep trying to use welfare and prison to change people - to make them think and behave the way we do - when the truth is the incentives work only for those who already think the way we do: who view today’s action with an eye on the future.
(10) We will take lowly work (if that is all that’s available) because we believe we can make bad jobs work for us. We avoid crime not because we are better people but because we see getting caught as a future-wrecking disaster. We are guided by a belief that good things will happen for us in the future if we take proper care of the present. Even under the worst of circumstances, we believe we are in control of our lives.
(11) And we have trouble understanding that not everybody believes as we believe. The welfare rolls, the prisons and the mean streets of our cities are full of people who have given up on their future. Without hope for the future, hard work at a low-paid job makes no sense. Working hard in school, or pleasing a boss, or avoiding pregnancy makes no sense. The deadly disease is hopelessness. The lawlessness and poverty are only the obvious symptoms.
(12) I’m not advocating that we stop looking for incentives to move poor people toward self-sufficiency or that we stop punishing people for criminal behavior. There will always be some people who need help and some who deserve to be in jail.
(13) All I’m saying is that the long-term answer both to welfare and the crime that plagues our communities is not to fine tune the welfare and criminal justice system but to prevent our children from getting the disease of despair.
(14) If we encourage our young people to believe in the future, and give them solid evidence for believing, we’ll find both crime and poverty shrinking to manageable proportions.
It can be inferred from Para. 7 that optimum penalties are________to the underclass.
选项
A、hopeless
B、useless
C、frightening
D、humiliating
答案
B
解析
推断题。根据第七段,我们知道对于中产阶级来说,仅仅被起诉就已经可以威慑他们了,但是对于下层阶级却毫无用处,故选B。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/ZqtK777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
Itisnaturalforyoungpeopletobecriticaloftheirparentsattimesandtoblamethemformostofthemisunderstandingsbetw
A.becauseB.experienceC.pushedintoD.objectionsE.protestedF.complaintsG.opposeH.losingI.thatJ.successful
A.becauseB.experienceC.pushedintoD.objectionsE.protestedF.complaintsG.opposeH.losingI.thatJ.successful
WhichofthefollowingsentencesisINCORRECT?
Sheremainsconfidentand______untroubledbyourpresentproblems.
Theclauseinthesentence"Itseemsthathisideaismorepractical"is
A、Asearlyaspossible.B、48hoursinadvance.C、24hoursinadvance.D、6hoursinadvance.B细节题。对话中图书管理员说:“Mostpeopletendto
Heisquitesurethatit’s_______impossibleforhimtofulfillthetaskwithintwodays.
Theseoverseasexpertscamefromall________oflifeindifferentcountries.
随机试题
下列对旅行社性质的表述中不正确的是()。
1996年6月,人民银行放开了对同行拆借利率的管制,形成了全国统一的同业拆借市场利率一__________。()
抽取胸腔积液过程中出现胸膜反应,最恰当的治疗是
苏冰滴丸制备时所用的基质和冷却剂是
不可以召集基金份额持有人大会的是()。
某县城经纬物资供销公司系增值税一般纳税人,2015年会计账务已结,决算报表已编制。2016年3月15日企业所得税汇算清缴期限内,诚信税务师事务所受经纬物资供销公司委托对其2015年度的纳税情况进行审核,并出具2015年度企业所得税汇算清缴鉴证报告。税务师经
单位工程概算包括()。
先将线段AB分成20等分,线段上的等分点用“△”标注,再将该线段分成21等分,等分点用“O”标注(AB两点都不标注),现在发现“△”和“O”之间的最短处为2厘米,问线段AB的长度为多少?()
给定资料1.2017年5月12日,W集团董事长王先生发表题为《努力践行文化自信》的主旨演讲,以下是内容节选:W集团长期坚持对员工进行中国优秀传统文化教育,逐步建立员工对中国文化的自信。我们是全国第一家集体学习《论语》的企业,20
SunburstHotelLocation:OnWaikikiBeachfacingtheoceanononeofthemainbeachesontheislandofOahu.Accommodati
最新回复
(
0
)