首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
职业资格
The first time I questioned the conventional wisdom on the nature of a healthy diet, I was in my salad days, almost 40 years ago
The first time I questioned the conventional wisdom on the nature of a healthy diet, I was in my salad days, almost 40 years ago
admin
2015-03-27
122
问题
The first time I questioned the conventional wisdom on the nature of a healthy diet, I was in my salad days, almost 40 years ago, and the subject was salt. Researchers were claiming that salt supplementation was unnecessary after strenuous exercise, and this advice was being passed on by health reporters. All I knew was that I had played high school football in suburban Maryland, sweating profusely through double sessions in the swamp like 90-degree days of August. Without salt pills, I couldn’t make it through a two-hour practice; I couldn’t walk across the parking lot afterward without cramping.
While sports nutritionists have since come around to recommend that we should indeed replenish salt when we sweat it out in physical activity, the message that we should avoid salt at all other times remains strong. Salt consumption is said to raise blood pressure, cause hypertension and increase the risk of premature death. This is why the Department of Agriculture’s dietary guidelines still consider salt Public Enemy No. 1, coming before fats, sugars and alcohol. It’ s why the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has suggested that reducing salt consumption is as critical to long-term health as quitting cigarettes.
And yet, this eat-less-salt argument has been surprisingly controversial—and difficult to defend. Not because the food industry opposes it, but because the actual evidence to support it has always been so weak.
When I spent the better part of a year researching the state of the salt science back in 1998— already a quarter century into the eat-less-salt recommendations—journal editors and public health administrators were still remarkably candid in their assessment of how flimsy the evidence was implicating salt as the cause of hypertension.
While, back then, the evidence merely failed to demonstrate that salt was harmful, the evidence from studies published over the past two years actually suggests that restricting how much salt we eat can increase our likelihood of dying prematurely. Put simply, the possibility has been raised that if we were to eat as litde salt as the U.S.D.A. and theC.D.C. recommend, we’d be harming rather than helping ourselves.
Why have we been told that salt is so deadly? Well, the advice has always sounded reasonable. It has what nutritionists like to call "biological plausibility". Eat more salt and your body retains water to maintain a stable concentration of sodium in your blood. This is why eating salty food tends to make us thirsty: we drink more; we retain water. The result can be a temporary increase in blood pressure, which will persist until our kidneys eliminate both salt and water.
The scientific question is whether this temporary phenomenon translates to chronic problems: if we eat too much salt for years, does it raise our blood pressure, cause hypertension, then strokes, and then kill us prematurely? It makes sense, but it’s only a hypothesis. The reason scientists do experiments is to find out if hypotheses are true.
The N.I.H. has spent enormous sums of money on studies to test the hypothesis, and those studies have singularly failed to make the evidence any more conclusive.
With nearly everyone focused on the supposed benefits of salt restriction, little research was done to look at the potential dangers. But four years ago, Italian researchers began publishing the results from a series of clinical trials, all of which reported that, among patients with heart failure, reducing salt consumption increased the risk of death.
Salt pills seem to be a kind of substance which______.
选项
A、improves one’s performance in sports competition
B、provides one with necessary salt supplementation
C、prevents one from being addicted to salt
D、provides one with extra energy
答案
D
解析
根据第一段最后一句可知,如果没有salt pills的话,作者根本不可能做运动或走路,因此可推出salt pills可以提供能量。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/ZwCv777K
本试题收录于:
英语学科知识与教学能力题库教师资格分类
0
英语学科知识与教学能力
教师资格
相关试题推荐
Ifateacherattemptstoimplementthetop-downmodeltoteachlistening,he/sheislikelytopresent______.
ThefirsttimeIquestionedtheconventionalwisdomonthenatureofahealthydiet,Iwasinmysaladdays,almost40yearsago
WhichofthefollowingisNOTasuitablepre-listeningactivity?
Thephoneme/n/inthefirstwordofallthefollowingphraseschangesto/m/except______.
WhichofthefollowingmaterialsisNOTappropriateforateachertouseinlisteningpractice?
Takingphotographsofindividualsinprivateplaceswithouttheirconsentisnotacceptable,unless______bythepublicinterest.
Manyyearsago,IcameacrossabookbyAnthonydeMellocalledAwareness.DeMellowasanIndianJesuitpriestwhosewritingwa
TheBritishMedicalJournalrecentlyfeaturedastrongresponsetowhatwasjudgedaninappropriatelylenientreactionbyamedi
Teachingcasesmainlyincludeteachingreflection,teachingrecord,and______.
下面片段选自某高中英语课堂教学实录。Step11.T:WhowroteHamletandKingLear?SS:WilliamShakespeare.T:Letslearnaboutthelif
随机试题
Televisionthatmostpervasionandpersuasiveofmoderntechnologies,markedbyrapidchangeandgrowthismovingintoanewera
A、补脾益肠丸B、固本益肠丸C、葛根芩连片D、香连片E、复方鸡内金片有清热燥湿,行气止痛功能的是()
患者,男,45岁,排便后肛门局部疼痛,昨日突然加剧,肛口可触及一肿块,直径1.5cm,紫色,触痛。考虑可能是()
现金流量表按照收付实现制填制。( )
下列行为中,符合银行业从业人员职业操守关于“风险提示”规定的有()。
以下关于社区居民自治的特点表述不正确的是()。
根据以下资料,回答86-90题据初步测算,2006年广东完成生产总值25968.55亿元,比上年增长14.1%,经济总量继续列全国第一位置。其中,第一产业增长3.8%,第二产业增长16.9%,第三产业增长12.2%。与此同时,鲁、苏、浙、沪也稳定协调发展
求.
若在μC/OS—II操作系统下共运行64个任务,则最低优先级的任务的名称为___________【69】任务,其优先级为___________【70】。
______(因肺癌正在接受治疗的人)weremuchmoreanxioushalf-waythroughtheirtreatmentthantheyhadbeenatthebeginning.
最新回复
(
0
)