首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
admin
2021-10-20
60
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. A Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned, that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchmen acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads—against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness (无情) toward individuals.
What does the passage mainly discuss?
选项
A、Railroad oppressing individuals in the US.
B、History of the US railroads.
C、Railroad workers’ working rights.
D、Law cases concerning the railroads.
答案
D
解析
本文主要介绍的是美国法院在铁路公司伤害案中的裁决,因此D是最佳答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/a8tK777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
Thesecurityguardhaddifficultyin_______thefansfromrushingontothestagetotakephotoswiththepopsinger.
Whichoftheitalicizedpartsfunctionsasanobject?
Weallseeandhearaboutextraordinarypeoplearoundusandwonderwhywecan’tbemorelikethem.Sometimeswechuckthatnoti
A.designsB.energyC.contextsD.generallyE.walkingF.timeG.exposingH.accessI.returnedJ.appealK.unethica
A.designsB.energyC.contextsD.generallyE.walkingF.timeG.exposingH.accessI.returnedJ.appealK.unethica
A.dietB.regularlyC.healthyD.commonlyE.reducedF.samplesG.containsH.participatedI.drinkJ.measuredK.av
[A]school[B]numbers[C]emphasize[D]continue[E]significant[F]undoubtedly[G]weak[H]countries[I]invisible[J]ignore[K]unloc
Whichofthefollowingsentencesexpressesapassivemeaning?
PASSAGEONEWhydidthegirlplaybasketballoverandoveragain?
随机试题
A.天南星配生姜B.甘草配甘遂C.石膏配牛膝D.丁香配郁金E.藜芦配白芍
患者,男性,20岁。1周来有食欲减退、恶心、呕吐,尿色加深,巩膜有轻度黄染,既往无肝炎病史。下列哪项提示HBV在体内复制并具有传染性?()
()账户可用于支付工资及奖金。
税务师事务所质量控制的要素包括()。
联结主义学习理论认为()
我国目前已经识别和认定的民族共有56个,我国还有()多万人的民族成分尚未最后确定。
一、注意事项1、申论考试与传统的作文考试不同,是分析驾驭材料的能力与表达能力并重的考试。2、作答参考时限:阅读时间40分钟,作答110分钟。3、仔细阅读给定的资料,按照后面提出的“作答要求”依次作答在答题纸指定位置。4、答题时认准题号,避免答错位置
关于职业道德描述正确的是()。
[*]
Readingtooneselfisamodernactivitywhichwasalmostunknowntothescholarsoftheclassicalmedievalworlds,whileduring
最新回复
(
0
)