首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
admin
2021-10-20
55
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. A Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned, that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchmen acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads—against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness (无情) toward individuals.
What does the passage mainly discuss?
选项
A、Railroad oppressing individuals in the US.
B、History of the US railroads.
C、Railroad workers’ working rights.
D、Law cases concerning the railroads.
答案
D
解析
本文主要介绍的是美国法院在铁路公司伤害案中的裁决,因此D是最佳答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/a8tK777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
Peoplewhoworkinthecityactually_______inneighbouringtowns.
Seeingthebeautifulscenery,thelittleboyclimbedupthehill______himself.
Thisisthesmallhouselessthan15squaremetres,under______rooflivesalargefamilyofthreegenerations.
Nobodyyetknowshowlongandhowseriouslytheshakinessinthefinancialsystemwill______downtheeconomy.
—HaveyoureturnedfromJapanyet?—Yes,butI______athomeforonlyfourdaysbeforemycompanysentmetoAustralia.
A.designsB.energyC.contextsD.generallyE.walkingF.timeG.exposingH.accessI.returnedJ.appealK.unethica
ThemainpurposeofEnglishessaywritingistointroduceyoutotheconventionsofacademicwritingandcriticalthinking.Whil
[A]befriend[B]directly[C]drives[D]slide[E]various[F]enormous[G]dumb[H]produce[I]blindly[J]affection[K]aware[L]observe[
A、Bydoingnothing.B、Byabsorbingmaterialabouttheguests’career.C、Bydoingsomeresearchabouttheinterviewees.D、Bygett
A.accuracyB.credibleC.decadeD.deceptiveE.entirelyF.fedG.fundamentalH.increasinglyI.multipleJ.partlyK.
随机试题
企业管理现代化、自动化的标志是标准化和数据化。()
下列哪种不是毒性代谢产物的常见靶器官?
煤矿安全监察机构对煤矿安全措施进行监察时,以下()行为属于违法行为,应责令其改正。
一项工程的单组门窗框扇的基本工作时间是3h,辅助时间占工序作业时间的比率是10%,规范时间占定额时间的比率为5%,则该项工作的定额时间是()小时。
总投资收益率的计算中,投资总额的构成包括()。
下列关于车辆购置税的说法中,正确的是()。
老张今年57岁,自2001年以来一直在某公司工作,与公司签订的劳动合同将于2017年7月底到期,老张希望与公司续签合同,公司因他年纪偏大,知识更新滞后,难以适应新业务要求,通知他到期终止合同。根据《劳动合同法》,下列关于老张与劳动合同的说法,正确的是(
在所有招聘媒体中,()是最新出现的,并受到了越来越多单位的青睐。
秦王赢政读韩非书,感叹日:“寡人得见此人,与之游,死不恨矣。”你认为赢政此次感叹的主要原因是()。
Ford1.Ford’sgreatstrengthwasthemanufacturingprocess--notinvention.Longbeforehestartedacarcompany,hewasa
最新回复
(
0
)