首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
For nearly a century, two United States governmental agencies, the United States Army Corps of Engineers and the Bureau of Recla
For nearly a century, two United States governmental agencies, the United States Army Corps of Engineers and the Bureau of Recla
admin
2022-07-08
35
问题
For nearly a century, two United States governmental agencies, the United States Army Corps of Engineers and the Bureau of Reclamation, have constructed dams to store water and to generate electricity. Building these dams provided cheap electricity, created jobs for workers, stimulated regional economic development, and allowed farming on lands that would otherwise be too dry. But not everyone agrees that big dam projects are entirely beneficial. Their storage reservoirs stop the flow of rivers and often submerge towns, farms, and historic sites. They prevent fish migrations and change aquatic habitats essential for native species.
The tide may have turned, in fact, against dam building. In 1998 the Army Corps announced that it would no longer be building large dams. In the few remaining sites where dams might be built, public opposition is so great that getting approval for projects is unlikely. Instead, the new focus may be on removing existing dams and restoring natural habitats. In 1999 Bruce Babbitt, the then United States interior secretary, said, —Of the 75,000 large dams in the United States, most were built a long time ago and are now
obsolete
and unsafe. They were built with no consideration of the environmental costs. As operating licenses come up for renewal, dam removal and habitat restoration to original stream flows will be among the options considered.
The first active hydroelectric dam in the United States to be removed against the wishes of its owners was the 162-year-old Edwards Dam, on the Kennebec River in Augusta, Maine. For many years, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service had advocated the removal of this dam, which prevented migration of salmon, shad, sturgeon, and other fish species up the river. In a precedent-setting decision, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ordered the dam removed after concluding that the environmental and economic benefits of a free-flowing river outweighed the electricity generated by the dam. In July 1999 the dam was removed and restoration work began on wetlands and stream banks long underwater.
The next dams likely to be taken down are the Elwha and Glines Dams on the Elwha River in Olympic National Park in the state of Washington. Built nearly a century ago to provide power to lumber and paper mills in the town of Port Angeles, these dams blocked access to upstream spawning beds for six species of salmon on what once was one of the most productive salmon rivers in the world. Simply removing the dams will not restore the salmon, however. Where 50-kilogram king salmon once fought their way up waterfalls to lay their eggs in gravel beds, there now are only concrete walls holding back still water and deep beds of muddy deposits. Removing the mud, uncovering gravel beds where fish spawn, and finding suitable salmon types to rebuild the population is a daunting task. Congress will have to appropriate somewhere around $300 to $400 million to remove these two relatively small dams and rehabilitate the area.
Environmental groups, encouraged by these examples, have begun to talk about much more ambitious projects. Four giant dams on the Snake River in Washington State, for example, might be removed to restore salmon and steelhead fish runs to the headwaters of the Columbia River. The Hetch Hetchy Dam in Yosemite National Park might be taken down to reveal what John Muir, the founder of the prestigious environmental organization Sierra Club, called a valley—just as beautiful and worthy of preservation as the majestic Yosemite. Some groups have even suggested removing the Glen Canyon Dam on the Colorado River. In each of these cases, powerful interests stand in opposition. These dams generate low-cost electricity and store water that is needed for agriculture and industry. Local economies, domestic water supplies, and certain types of recreation all would be severely impacted by destruction of these dams.
The word ambitious in Paragraph 5 is closest in meaning to________.
选项
A、impressive but difficult to achieve
B、dangerous and require considerable planning
C、complex and unlikely to be complete
D、greatly needed
答案
A
解析
ambitious形容物时意为“宏太的;艰巨的”,故A项“令人印象深刻,但是很难完成的”是对ambitious的很好阐释。B项“危险且需周密筹划的”、C项“复杂且不太可能完成的”,D项“非常需要的”均不符合题意。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/b7MO777K
本试题收录于:
CATTI二级笔译综合能力题库翻译专业资格(CATTI)分类
0
CATTI二级笔译综合能力
翻译专业资格(CATTI)
相关试题推荐
Somecoupleshireaweddingplannerwhilemanyorganizetheirweddingthemselves.
Somecoupleshireaweddingplannerwhilemanyorganizetheirweddingthemselves.
Howdidtheemployeesreactwhentheyheardaboutthesellingofthecompany?
Smallcommunities,withtheirdistinctivecharacter—wherelifeis【C1】________andintenselyhuman—aredisappearing.Somehave【C2】
Whatisthebenefitofdarkchocolate?
KofiAnnansayshelpingsurvivorsoflastweek’searthquakeand【C1】______intheIndianOceanis【C2】______.TheUnitedNationsse
Historyisfullofjobsthattookanimmensephysicaltollonemployees,fromminersandconstructionworkersthroughtothosew
Westernjurieshavetraditionallyfoundeyewitnesstestimonytobethemostconvincingevidenceincriminaltrials.Seeingisbe
Experimentshaveshownthat160decibelsofnoisearelethalforsmallfur-bearinganimals.
A、Awideselectionofinvestments.B、Alimitedrangeofgrowthstock.C、Agroupoflowriskbondsandcash.D、Agroupofhighri
随机试题
腰椎间盘脱出症最重要的体征是
确诊宫颈癌的可靠方法是
下列选项中()不属于评价环境质量变化效益(或费用)的方法。
在二审程序中,对于()的情况,人民法院应作出维持原判。
5,6,8,12,12,20,17,30,()
下列关于黄河流域的自然环境的说法正确的是:
设fn(x)=.
Ihaveomittedmanythingswhich______aplaceinthebook.
Wecanseehoweveryphilosopherreflectsthesociallifeofhisday.PlatoandAristotle,intheslave-owningsocietyofancien
MusicMusicistheabstractartofarrangingvocalorinstrumentalsounds/inamannerthatproducesaflowing,unifiedand
最新回复
(
0
)